Questions about Roulette Mining (RM) program - atoms, algorithms, offers

foxography wrote:
- Will it be possible in the future to edit the entry level of the existing deposit, which Shpilevoy wrote about a little earlier? For example, today I have $50, this is the so-called first level. Based on the size of the deposit, the bot could regulate the size of the bets proportionally to the risks. As an option. I just asked. Well, no, so no

We build the game with even entries of 1000 chips. Depending on their financial capabilities (or better yet, on the profit generated by the bot), the player decides on the SCALE of the upcoming game.

The scenario is as follows:
If you have $50, you can play 0.10 and count on 50% working leverage of 500 chips.
The bot lost several $50 entries, then withdrew the balance to $200.
The player returned $100 to his game fund and then played a full session with the remaining $100.
Bot made x5.
The player withdrew $100 into the game fund and played with $400 at a scale of $0.20.
If you're lucky, $400 turns into $1000.
Gradually, the player increases his game fund, creates a safety cushion for future games and receives a hefty profit from casino mining.

Casino mining develops further depending on current results.

Today we analyze the statistics of the RM program games and for the sake of extended session histories we have lowered the aggressive swing of dispersion, so exits to x5 x10 are quite rare. But we control the potential of powerful passes and as soon as their share becomes stable and frequent enough, the program will start showing really amazing results:

foxography wrote:
- Will there be at least a superficial explanation of the principle of how atoms work? You can send it in a PM, or in the thread. Some are clear. Some are not. Not at all. This understanding will allow the player to more skillfully and efficiently manage the picture at the table and use different atoms in different situations.

Atoms are autonomous simple and complex betting strategies for casino roulette. Their partial and full description can be found on the pages of the CMP website, in Boris Ruban's books and in the Private zone.

Search the site:
100pravda.com/forum/search?query=%D0%B0%...te=all&childforums=1
Private Zone (paid subscription):
100pravda.com/forum/guide-for-novice/659...del-foruma-cmp#14608
Google books:
play.google.com/store/books/author?id=Boris+Ruban&hl=en_US

Our task is to completely eliminate the moments of player choice during the game; all processes should be automatic.

We don't want to, like many programs, shift the blame for losses to players. How can you force a person to make key choices in forecasts and bets? If the player knew the optimal decisions, he would not need a program to win.

For individual decisions, each atom can be perceived as a separate player gathered at the same roulette table. To decide which one to follow, it is enough to look at the dynamics of the credit for a specific atom and the current level of its bets. You can freely combine a set of active atoms at any time.

These tools are in the program.

foxography wrote:
- Will it be possible to save the history of your own sessions and analyze them for future ones? I don't know why I asked this. But seriously, I don't quite understand one point - the bot applies the work of the algorithms of the included atoms each time in a new way, right? If the current session brought a loss, for example, of minus $ 50, the next one - similarly. "The battle is lost, but the war is not lost", then is it possible, based on this personal history (if there was one), to "allow" the bot to use a more aggressive method, that is, taking into account the entire cycle for a certain period? I have always been bad at explanations, but I hope I explained my question more or less clearly. I tried)

E pluribus unum

In the long run, old-timers remember the old version of CMP, the pool becomes an organizing center, where miners sort orders from the queue and work out "one big Long-run game" on many hands. The security service of any casino will not be able to track all the wins and losses as one chain of consecutive games to squeeze money out of the casino.

In this version of work, each miner will have his own account with full statistics of his games and results. The pool makes mutual settlements: redistributes profits and compensates intermediate losses to each participant.

The aggressiveness of the game (options: tight progressions, narrow bets, powerful hits) should be used within the current session at the level of the built-in expert, but should not be carried over between sessions.

Smooth entries and overall positive results are the strategy for winning the war with the casino.

foxography wrote:
- is the possibility (again, in the future) of using the bot in the "constructor" mode being considered? Oh..., I have to explain again... I chose a specific atom. But I don't like its level of aggression, for example. Or its attacks on specific numbers using existing algorithms. As a person, I see that the casino is leading the bot astray, that the "solution" will come, but probably a little later, that the deposit may not be enough for this with the current pace, but it is not worth completely discounting an earlier "solution". How could one act in this situation? Switch completely to "manual mode"? Or what?

The casino can lead the bot a little to the side much longer than your wildest expectations. No one can look into the future and know for sure whether there will be a solution or not in the next 5-10 spins. These decisions should be made based on the balance of typical situations, so we collect statistics of all games to develop optimal solutions by the program itself.

Experienced players will be convinced not to interfere with the bot's work only by the ironclad statistics of victories. At the moment, everyone can completely turn off the clicker in the bot at the right moment and take over the game, switch it to manual mode.

Boris repeatedly closed the program with the words: "The bot did all the preparatory work, although it went into the minus", then played according to his strategy and ended up with a plus. While the adaptive continued to throw out the bot's logic, the new strategy went like a knife through butter.

foxography wrote:
- Are suggestions for improving the bot's work welcome? For example, adding new atoms. How does it happen? Based on what data are decisions made? After what analyses? Why? Who should I write to? Where should I run?)
Again, more seriously, I understand perfectly well that there are, so to speak, some nuances of the work that I don't want to reveal in defense of the performance of atoms. But tell me in a few words some of the main points) I've been on the forum for almost a year, but I still haven't found any answers. I don't know, maybe I missed it. If so, then I apologize.

Of course, any suggestions are welcome.

NEW ATOMS of the RM program
(how to add strategy to Roulette Mining program)

1. Repeatability and effectiveness. The player has a stable strategy, according to which he repeatedly makes x5 x10 deposit.
2. Strategy is not based on gut feeling, but can be clearly formalized into a specific step-by-step algorithm of actions.
3. The strategy does not contain a false basis: ballistics, magic of numbers, etc. Let's imagine on a casino roulette, instead of numbers, stickers: "banana", "doll", "car", "cherry", "cube", etc. Does the strategy still work?
4. The player makes a statement about his favorite strategy, demonstrates examples of the game and sends a detailed description (it is better to create your own topic in Private, but you can use e-mail admin@casino-mining.com or PM LUCKY-13).
5. The CMP Administration reviews and decides on the viability of the proposed strategy and its adaptive resilience.
6. The stage of writing the algorithm and trial tests.
7. If the results are satisfactory, then this strategy may well be included in RM as a new atom to receive mass stream testing.

foxography wrote:
Oh yeah, the last question - explain to an ignoramus what the symbols in expert mode mean? If it's not secret information, of course..) I hope for specific answers. Thank you!

The description of technical symbols in Debug mode and in the RM program operation statistics was given repeatedly, but was lost during the statistics cleanup when changing versions.

In short, the main symbols of the legend are:

◯ - spin
⚓ - atom in sleep mode
☑:5 - virtual bet on 5 numbers
☐ - no bets
◩:7 - there is a bet for a group of atoms on 7 numbers
◧L - there are bets for one atom, L - loss
⟰ - MAX reached
☠ - working shoulder is worked out, end of session
LWWWWLWLLW - Win/Loss chain of the last spins
W++ - fat center wins
W+++ - best bet number