✪ RM Casino Roulette Software (PC/Android)

Niko he got based on the statistics of misses and hits, assuming the very possibility of hitting according to the statistics of the falling out of active and passive numbers. So you can do it once for no reason just on the statistics of luck.
I can do that too, but I won't show 1K credits if you don't know the reason for the coincidence in a specific spin as well as the reason for the miss, this is a random coincidence that can't be repeated according to the scenario, about which he himself writes "the adaptive missed..." i.e. he assumed that the adaptive could throw over, but didn't do it for a reason that he doesn't know.
I am trying to calculate a specific spin with an answer, assuming that the generation does not change, i.e. if the bet hits, then I will be able to show and explain the coincidence in a specific spin, and not by statistics with the fear of "the adaptive missed..." There is a fundamental difference between 100% hit in the adaptive answer and what Shpilevoy calls "missed", i.e. doubts to the last that the bet will work.

LUCKY-13 wrote:
Let's reveal a little secret

The clicker is built on bare screen coordinates: field corners and chip buttons + interface.
There are no checks of which casino a person is playing in, as was the case with the CMP bot.

Choose the Profit clicker and feel free to use it IN ANY CASINO!

Field angles: needed to correctly calculate how the numbers are located. There are surprisingly skewed trapezoid tables. The only condition is that zero is on the left.
Set chips based on the minimum: 1-5-10-50-100
Buttons: cancel (not used at all), repeat (everyone has it), spin (Profit has it, but not Livs, they start it automatically).
If the spin button at the end of the setup is NOT needed(?), then click it somewhere to the side.

Enjoy!

.

That's how I understood it. Only the bet often flies off - pokes in vain. It is necessary to follow or play on large screens.

Shpilevoy wrote: I'm watching the video = well, a real person is dragging chips around the field, not a program ))))
Cool!

////////////////////////

If he didn't jump to the 0.5 chip after betting 0.1, when he should have bet 0.5 or 0.7, but clicked 5 or 7 times at 0.1. - It would be 100% like a player.

Shpilevoy wrote:
and during the transition of the series, the CC switched the “diameter” offsets so that the adaptive would go crazy with the search for an option to overturn

How is that? I still don't understand why I set the offset to 18.

Altai wrote: In Betvoyager I top up my balance with a card. Withdrawal of funds 4 working days. Basically 7 days, depending on the weekend. But if you request a withdrawal on Monday, then on Friday the money is already on the card. If later than Monday, then you have to wait a week. I tried to register in neteller, but unfortunately our country is not supported there. Therefore, I only use a card.
And please make a click with BV, and let those who want to play.

Let's reveal a little secret



The clicker is built on bare screen coordinates: field corners and chip buttons + interface.
There are no checks of which casino a person is playing in, as was the case with the CMP bot.

Choose the Profit clicker and feel free to use it IN ANY CASINO!

Field angles: needed to correctly calculate how the numbers are located. There are surprisingly skewed trapezoid tables. The only condition is that zero is on the left.
Set chips based on the minimum: 1-5-10-50-100
Buttons: cancel (not used at all), repeat (everyone has it), spin (Profit has it, but not Livs, they start it automatically).
If the spin button at the end of the setup is NOT needed(?), then click it somewhere to the side.

Enjoy!

* * *

BetVoyager 0.01-0.05-0.10-0.50-1
Does not have a denomination of 0.05. Therefore, it is necessary to decide on it: either repeat 0.01 (understate), or choose 0.10 (get ahead of events). When RM places bets instead of 0.05, it will choose the denomination you set.

Vladimir wrote:
Boris, thanks for the video!
Question - why does the pressure on the track not match the pressure on the field? (the size of the stakes, for a bold interception b/w)

on the field = this is pseudo-static (due to displacements) play on 4 centers
on the track = this is a game of closing 2 sectors of those same 4 centers

it was like two autonomous games field/track each with its own current state, without taking into account the pressure of "what's going on with the other one"