Roulette MEGA Tracker (RMT) Casino Betting Calculator on Google Play

Shpilevoy writes:
Vladimir, you are wrong.
This PRO game isn't about you coming up with a clever sequence of where-when-how much and repeating it a million times in a loop...

There must be a comprehensive understanding of what is happening.
such a multi-layered foundation
and mathematics and theory of probability probably take up no less than 1/3 of this basic knowledge

For example, you cover a block of 7 numbers with different loads with bets on the field,
You play it on repeat, and Loss comes up.
= this is a very practical situation

* How many spins do you think you can hold it for and it will be okay?
* How much further should I rebet and where is the line of "not at all normal"?
* You've decided to partially restructure your bet. Which numbers are best to keep and which ones to change?
etc.
= the theorist answers such questions, and people who DEEPLY UNDERSTAND him (Alatissa really amazed me)

these are valuable personnel on our side of the barricades....

oh! differently!
Vladimir, imagine you have a bad cold, grandma's raspberry tea is all you need )))) But Alt2005 and Alatissa are pharmacists and microbiologists = they understand science and know how to make the right pills
Even if NOW you don't see ready-made pills for yourself from them, they have a huge potential to eventually CREATE them and save your life

Alt, Olynes and I never poured water.
Shpilevoy himself admitted that knowledge of the theory of belief is very important. Need I remind you?

Alatissa wrote:

.. But there are collisions. And they have nothing to do with the reversals.

Then answer the question in your topic:
(Discrete distributions (Alatissa expert in probability theory)
Where to bet, why, and how much, and don't just play the fool like Alt, Olynes, and Klon do. Information that doesn't help you win is a hindrance and is considered dissident in most camps.
Or am I wrong?

Shpilevoy writes:

we fish specifically, for example, 23-32 up to 2L.

The 23-32 reversals aren't a collision. It's just a regular 23, and just as regular 32. Just like all the others.

And there is no point in making a fetish out of them.

.. But there are collisions. And they have nothing to do with the shapeshifters.

DLK wrote: Is that Alatissa there on the couch with a big glass?

DLK,
This is how he plays with images with me.
It represents me as conquered by the negative mind,

looking at the one who talks about adaptability from the bottom up and with admiration,
And also to get drunk from his speeches...

In fact, analytical thinking is always with me and he will not expect any obedience from me...
But let him fantasize)

Shpilevoy wrote:

mod
ATOM G-17

The offset predicate by field remains the same (by the last two numbers in one column).
The changes will affect the betting format itself = I open the center and its S1 splits on the field, and I add single chips to the numbers themselves at the edges of S2.
In fact, the G-17 expands to become a full-fledged neighbor on the track + additional suction cups (splits) appear at the numbers closest to the center.

////////////
Additionally, it is not possible to link the formed adjacent fields with splits in RMT, since all bets are only on the number.

Ready!



///////////////////////////////

Everything is in keeping with the new fashionable tradition = with a fixation on the third stage, the elimination game.

Also, by analogy with EdGUT, the check for an output of x2 of the squared deviation of the expectation norm is disabled.
//////////////////////////////////////////

mod
ATOM G-17