Roulette MEGA Tracker (RMT) Casino Betting Calculator on Google Play

Shpilevoy wrote:

Note that the bet is 34 chips. Width/depth...
In this session, after several successful cycles at the beginning of +100 chips, we hit a stall that is slowly eating away at our credit... the goal of +100 chips from the entry into the working cycle is not achieved and becomes increasingly less achievable as the drawdown continues...

////////////////////

Look, the first bet = 2 centers (10 chips) + 4 numbers forward + 3 numbers back. Total: about 18 numbers or less.
The first W + 2 chips and 2 S on the track. 28 chips total. This is where you need to really think. Take your time...

Shpilevoy wrote:
3) increasing pressure... instead of simple progressions, I'll try the formula (34-N) where N is the number of numbers in the bet at the current moment, such a smooth self-regulating pump

You cannot combine $ and Piece in a formula.
34 chips will most likely be duplicated in many places.
(24-N) with boundary checks will do.

Edwerk wrote:

Initial betting field === 9 pieces from the frame + 2 neighbors s2 === in theory always.

Anti-adaptive component I suggest your option, colleague, remove the bet after two misses and at the first virtual W again stick repeats until +100 chips from MAX WIN are squeezed out without changing the arrangement and adding new dropped chips up to 34....

We look, as before, no deeper than 113 spins (for the 2/3 law)...

I propose limiting ourselves to the classic 100 spins of statistics in depth for analysis.

1) Radius-100 is elementary.

2) "at the first virtual W" === not exactly a good idea....



Note that the bet is 34 chips. Width/depth...
In this session, after several successful cycles at the beginning of +100 chips, we hit a stall that is slowly eating away at our credit... the goal of +100 chips from the entry into the working cycle is not achieved and becomes increasingly less achievable as the drawdown continues...

///////////////////
Here it is definitely better not to wait for W-Virtual to play up to 2L === but somehow smoothly REDUCE THE BETTING FIELD and RAISE THE BETS IN THE REMAINING NUMBERS.

I'll try to complicate the scenario and borrow the elimination game mechanism from EVO-2.
1) We play your option until the betting field reaches 34 chips + the credit is reduced by (-100) chips from the start of the work cycle. This means that instead of earning +100, we lost -100 on wide and shallow bets = the generation has crumbled into a web...
2) we move on to the elimination game = each time, the W-number is excluded and the betting field is gradually reduced, for example to 9 Stop Loss numbers.
3) increasing pressure... instead of simple progressions, I'll try the formula (34-N) where N is the number of numbers in the bet at the current moment, such a smooth self-regulating pump
4) If we still haven't reached the planned (+100) Stop Win chips during this move, we close the trading cycle and lock in the loss. Atom resets its game at the very beginning of its search for a new entry point.

+ there will be a general rule for transitioning to virtual reality
// cutting off long LOSS by 2 sigmas of the squared deviation = reset to V

to_DLK

DLK wrote: Shpilevoy often doesn't describe his thoughts in depth.

I describe the depth enough for experienced players and people who are getting into it.

On the ground is on the ground.
I'm not commenting on that.
You don't have an example of a game with adaptive.
Intelligence. Scenario. Answers. Picking up on answers.
What you are describing here is called "guess (predict) the variance".

Shpilevoy,
madams and mademoiselles -
this is in France,
We (where I live) have spadarstvos,
That is, spadars and spadars
Don't distort things.

Reconnaissance. Scenario. Answers. Picking up on answers.

+100500
Everything in its time.

good luck to you here, idzіtse kali weasel
100pravda.com/forum/replica/515-istorii-...skie?start=210#76538