Roulette MEGA Tracker (RMT) Casino Betting Calculator on Google Play

I tested 4.0.2 with different generations. What can I say, the outlines of how it should ultimately look are more visible here than ever before, it seems.

I tried regular sessions of 150 spins and saw how it reacted and what the RMT showed on a regular Overall 6 numbers. I noticed that the most common winning point was +300 if I was on a winning streak. So I set that as my target and ran 130 sessions with a take profit of +300 and a stop loss of -1000.

Out of 130 sessions, 91 reached the 300+ goal, and 39 dropped to -1000 faster. The maximum number of consecutive loss sessions was 4.

Overall, we can conclude that if the program shows the same 70% of sessions ending in +500, rather than +300, it will be a practically ready-to-use tool. Because even with evenly matched entries, +500 per session or 50% of the deposit equals a good advantage. And if you add a full or partial martingale, it will be very interesting.

The question is how to get those extra 200 chips. Like Boris, I noticed that bets of no more than 10 often only happen when the program has already fallen to -1000 or so, and once it reaches that level, it generally doesn't climb back up.

Also, most winning sessions occur when the roulette wheel generates repeats, either direct or adjacent. RMT generally handles this well, reading this and increasing the bet. But if the wheel generates according to other patterns, without repeats or bonuses, the session will mostly be losing. The EVO-2 atom plays a major role. It's often the leader in winning sessions and one of the main anchors when the balance plummets and bets are at 10-25, and LLL L...

Perhaps we should force a freeze on betting for 10-15 spins so that RMT can better understand the current generation pattern and which atom is best to target? Currently, it generates predictions starting from the fourth number, and 15-20 spins are often enough for +300, but perhaps it would improve overall accuracy if the analysis were to consider 10-15 numbers instead of three?

Alexey wrote:

Maybe I can help with the filling atomically STEREO?

That would be great!
It could be changed a bit. Modified.

I'm studying.
So far, I've been able to isolate the MONO approach (only the finals of the drawn number) and then the STEREO activation (numbers on the edges of the field from the drawn number). I'm thinking about how to separate the TYPE from the overall picture and add it to the tail of the strategy. Most likely, it will be a reversal for any drawn number according to the 6-9 pattern on the track, and the penultimate drawn number will also fall into the TYPE.
I'll write when I understand what to add))

Edwerk wrote:
The logic is simple. One attack consumes no more than half of the chips from a potential win. A single win out of two attacks at the end of the second attack returns everything wagered to the player's bankroll. The goal is to win once before losing 36 chips. If a win occurs, the player finishes the win and strengthens the center with the goal of doubling or tripling the profit in the winning sector. Any other number placed on the track will also bring a profit, but a smaller one. If a win occurs, the repetitions and sector strengthening continue until the first LOSS, just as Boris teaches us.

Another bug was discovered when playing OVERALL for EdGut and Simplex, with a bet width of 12. Unexpected predictions appear that don't correspond to the required triggers. For example, the unexpected prediction in the screenshot is for number 29: