Mirror - advanced mirror game in casino roulette

Shpilevoy replied to the topic When I lost at the casino (4.7 million) player mistakes
in this video I played out visits to mirrors and it was not in vain that I lost my deposit = there are many typical mistakes in it
1) the drain started when I tried to play a completely crooked/smeared mirror = this INFLATED THE WIDTH OF THE BETS and went completely beyond the limits of effectiveness...
2) in this video BET PRESSURE ONLY RISES = good strategies must have self-regulating markers/mechanisms to LOWER BET PRESSURE

DECREASE IN PRESSURE ==== !!!! ===== this is a very important point that I have in all strategies (especially on slots and this is not a periodic reset/cut, but markers in the game) === !!!! ==== this is not at all in RM and it is necessary to add this system to the expert

3) after the rise for x2, you need to correctly process the DESCENT point "TO YOURS" = when the game did not go and all the profit melts away
4) and of course I'M STUBBORN = fell out of the trends, I WANT I SEE won = while I was stuck on one sector, the roulette showed a bunch of other normal options, but they all passed me by...

understand, in order to freeze something, the casino is obliged to heat up something else somewhere ))) and when we dig our heels in, we simply fall out of the positive scenario because we hit our foreheads against the wall and do not see the various doors opening very close

5) driving bare static on replays = this is generally a bad style of play, "for the lazy"
in livas, God forbid you synchronize with some high roller and his "favorite" sector... and your deposit will be doomed to loss
therefore DYNAMICS is always preferable, at least you will have more chances to win and will be able to lead the adaptive casino by the nose for a longer time


17, 10, 17, 10,
this is an ABAB collision
there might be another one like this nearby... but I don't catch the scratched ones like ABAB
scratches only for mirrors

10-3-10-3 it's obvious
+ mirror 8
8-.-10-3-10-.-8
+two sectors in acceleration 25-34-17-21 and 8-10-10-8

ABA is also a point event, only not tied to a specific number, but rather like magneto physics and which numbers will be attracted is unknown
so we assume the SCENARIO is the same as with the hot 30..... and we strangle ABA while they are on the scoreboard

5-18-5
let's remember that the ABA collision has appeared
it is clear that the next move is B in bold, C in bold (entry to the mirror, the number is now no longer visible on the board)
and A to grab for the bet just in case.....
falls 15
the fact is that these are hares, we will catch them, because they give a point number of the forecast
+ something else, but not the main motive
we put bold 5 (5-15-5) + finals 5 slightly and spire slightly + 15 neighbor slightly
4 W+ falls due to 15 neighbor
we put bold 15 (15-4-15) + 15 neighbor and 4 neighbors well + a little spike especially to 3 and a little around 7 on the track
falls 15 W+++
the job is done and I didn't have to wait long )))))) I wouldn't press the third ears on the scoreboard, but just insure them a little = because they've already worked

Cosmic replied to the topic Profit Casino Roulette Generations for Strat Analysis
05, 05, 25, 02, 07, 22, 06, 31, 01, 01, 27, 14, 19, 15, 33, 16, 02, 29, 15, 19, 14, 32, 11, 14, 32, 13, 03, 03, 16, 16
04, 31, 30, 18, 36, 32, 25, 16, 07, 17, 32, 06, 28, 34, 28, 10, 31, 00, 20, 06, 15, 29, 30, 31, 30, 19, 30, 20, 33, 36
super mirror but how to catch it I don't know yet

Coin_8 wrote:
Since we're talking about algorithms...
You can't consider 12-21 as the only correct combination, and everything else as an adaptive action
How is 12-5 worse?
The algorithm works in a cloud of variations and for roulette it is ANTI-SYMMETRY and ANTI-ORDER. Chaos, my dear, however...
The cloud is manifested in the fact that, for example, today
12-21 (up to 2L as it has become fashionable) goes - - - + + + - + - + + - - - - - + + + - +
or
1-0-36 + + - - - + + - - - + - + - - + + + + - - + + + + - - - + + - +
and tomorrow these combinations play out in approximately the same way.
But the day after tomorrow everything changes dramatically
12-21 - - - - - + + - - - - - -
1-0-36 - - - + - - - + - - - -
and this drawing on the same table lasts for hundreds (if not thousands) of spins
I have provided real data, you can observe similar things yourself.
***
Therefore, at the beginning, it is necessary to understand, without provocations of the adaptive, what are the trends today. And only then choose a game line within the framework of the ALGORITHM.
Adaptive will wake up automatically when the loan breaks through the permitted upper limit.
And how to make him continue to throw money at you is the key question of understanding ADAPTIV.

Hunter: "... I'm leaning towards the topic of implicit repetitions, those that we don't see, or rather don't want to notice. This is a rather curious thing, if you consider the whole game in pieces of repetitions. Playing catch-up in repetitions brings its fruits, but the hardest thing is to see which repetitions fall..."

Coin_8: "The theory of total explicit and implicit patterns (repetitions of spin combinations) has a right to exist. A player can only mentally detect a small proportion of explicit patterns. Using a bot in this matter gives an undeniable advantage." On the other hand, the human brain is specialized in identifying patterns in the surrounding world in order to use them in the future to increase the chances of survival, so it is not surprising that an ideal random sequence, similar to a sequence generated by a simple deterministic algorithm, seems non-random to a person.
That is, in the flow of roulette spins, the player automatically picks out all sorts of "beautiful things" already after they are displayed and wrings his hands: - It was obvious! Why didn't I place a bet!!!???
Let's objectively look at the chronology of hits on "wonderful combinations" in the flow of spins of the pure RNG of our pool:
16 - 4 - 11 - 4 - 16
16 - 13 - 13 - 34
16 - 6 - 17 - 17 - 6 - ???(end of session)
31 - 8 - 12 - 8 - 10
17 - 3 - 35 - 3 - 35
31 - 35 - 5 - 35 - 12
30 - 22 - 22 - 22 - 34 - 22 - 22 - 35 - 19 - 22
34 - 26 - 36 - 26 - 16
6 - 25 - 25 - 0
28 - 5 - 5 - 35
24 - 7 - 31 - 17 - 36
20 - 6 - 6 - 3 - 3 - 12
14 - 35 - 35 - 18
4 - 32 - 32 - 26 - 4
35 - 4 - 7 - 4 - 17
6 - 4 - 10 - 4 - 34
14 - 9 - 35 - 9 - 31
8 - 9 - 0 - 9 - 3
16 - 19 - 27 - 19 - 4
34 - 5 - 5 - 5 - 1
16 - 36 - 21 - 25 - 28 - 7 - 7 - 29 - 2 - 19 - 11 - 16 -

Admin: from 7/7 clearly the neighbor of the mirror is coming
s28 5$ = (29)35
s25 35$ = (2) 245
s21 245$ = (19) 1715
s36 1715$ = (11) 12000
s16 12000$ = (16) 84000
As we can see, on a pure RNG, collisions often arise, but very rarely do they reach full implementation in the form of a "double mirror" and so on.
If in a casino during one game you see 2-3 cases of "completed wonderful combinations" - this is an adaptive casino trying to make your game memorable and interesting.
If we move on to practice, the machine is a neural network of artificial intelligence that combines the gaming experience of all miners who work according to this algorithm in each specific casino.

InquisitorEA: "The series 9-0-20-20-20-0-9 does not contain consecutive numbers, like for example 1-2-3-4-5, but it is just as artificial, even more... much. Exclude? On the contrary, after 9-0-20-20-20-0 the most probable is = 9. On the table we see letters, the order of which forms the word CONSTANTINOPLE, and we do not consider this arrangement to be accidental. However, if this word did not exist in any language, we would not even be able to suspect that this arrangement of letters has a very specific reason. If these same letters were located on the table randomly, for example STNOЬOAKOIPLTNN, we would not attach any significance to this fact, although the probability of such a random arrangement is equal to the probability of a random arrangement of letters forming the word CONSTANTINOPLE. We would be surprised if the number was pulled out of a bottle with 1000 numbers 1000, although the probability of drawing 427 is also equal to 1/1000. The more unusual the event, - concludes Laplace, - the greater the need we feel to find an exact explanation for it.

Elcano replied to the topic Peeping or calculating? (FoxDuhovny archive)
In the classic example of the 16.19 drop, a course of algorithmic calculations is assumed in which it is necessary to determine the existence of a connection between the dominant sector in the current version - 20.1, 33, 16.24 and the drop of number 16 top 2 loss in the S1-5x-N bundle, i.e. the center of top 2 is 33 and the number top 2 is 16.


Mira replied to the topic Generating roulette casino Profit for analysis of strat

Cosmic writes: good day to all
And who can tell me what this is called?
or am I missing something, maybe there is a scratched mirror here?

This is called ABA, ears, Cheburashka, hares.
It's better to wait for ABA next, large mirrors won't necessarily appear.


09 Aug 2018 02:47 - 09 Aug 2018 03:00 Alatissa replied to the topic Generating roulette casino Profit for analysis of strat
I really liked the generation for analytics, which DIDN'T like DLK
[img width=712,height=247]https://100pravda.com/media/kunena/attachments/175/%D0%B3%D0%B5%D 0%BD%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BA%D1%81.png[/img]
It really does look like counteraction,
it's just that for a better perception of what's happening it's desirable to see the whole picture (i.e. the history of bets)
but even from what I see...
I will highlight such a pattern in DLK as response to mirrors
Typical combinations ABCBA, ABBA ,ABBCCA and others
That is, when ABCВ, ABB, ABBCC appears on the screen - the increased bet is А (2L)
The generation is very interesting in my opinion:
the brightest entry point is the entry to the mirror АВВССА
.......13, 19, 19, 04, 04, 35, 30, 15, 01, 07, 25, 03, 13, 21, 26.........
I select the ten-spin block and... the solution A is on the eighth step
Most likely, Avax sometimes violates 2L and holds it longer, that's why adaptive is so... moved further away (to a safe distance), but still showed A.
Avax overwhelmingly knocks out A on the first turn.
and what about generations?
I will highlight the very best ones that attracted me:
(entry to the mirror of ABBA)
......27, 24, 24, 06, 33, 14, 08, 27, 03, 20, 01, 21, 34
And
......20, 05, 05, 01, 06, 24, 25, 13, 03, 31, 11, 27, 01
06 - via board number 27,
01- through board number 20 along the track
Adaptive already knows the player's template and responds at the very first step - across the board from the supposed fat A
(sews this answer into generation)
No less striking are these three:
entry to ABCVA
.....24, 11, 12, 11, 27, 01, 06, 21, 15, 00, 30, 19, 19, 16
on ABBA
.....30, 19, 19, 16, 27, 20, 05, 05, 01, 06, 24, 25, 13, 03
.....02, 16, 16, 15, 05, 22, 20, 12, 29, 06, 23, 09, 06, 32
if you look at the field, then 24/27, 30/27, 02/05 - vertical splits (by column)
in other words - across the board from the supposed fat one on the first (second) move (2 L)
(sews the answer into generation)
Here are three more (they are not as bright), but you can take a look:
...18, 02, 04, 02, 34, 16, 08, 29, 01, 25, 07, 20, 08, 02
...20, 33, 14, 33, 06, 29, 00, 27, 06, 31, 15, 09, 02, 24
...05, 14, 03, 14, 11, 35,24, 02, 17, 07, 31, 25, 11, 13
...25, 05, 05, 00, 34, 14, 06, 28, 10, 23, 17, 04, 28, 32
Now we need to think about how to use

Alatissa replied to the topic A droplet from the waterfall of observations of the mining BOT
ABCCBA format "mirror without an explicit axis" collision. 205
I only have one pre-mirror TV at a distance of 2000+ spins.
The mirror is not closed
An exotic bud that appeared in my garden = a barren flower.
[img width=130,height=346]https://100pravda.com/media/kunena/attachments/175/%D1%8 2%D0%B2%D0%B7%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B2%D0%B0.jpg[/img]
It turned out to be the only one, because the middle of B-C-C-B is also closed only once.
Total entry points 72 at a distance of 2000(+)
On the first move the mirror is closed 1 time
On the second move 1 time
On the third time 1 time
On the fourth time 1 time
On the fifth 2 times
On the sixth 2 times
On the seventh 2 times
On the eighth 0
On the ninth time 1 time
On the tenth time 1

The Bot has a built-in min bet to avoid missing a mirror,
and there is movement along the first line, reacting to almost every move. Of course it minuses.
Does not fall into the area of frequent hair loss.
I have another idea with a table, but I'll do it a little later, I need to prepare it.
ADM777 writes:

Why do you look at neighbors B

It's not important.
Roulette multivariate game(C) Coin
I chose this option because B already represents the beginning of the warm-up of either the B number itself or the narrow zone of the track in which B is located.
You can choose the "field" coordinate system. It doesn't matter.
The superposition of two strategies: closing the mirror and
return to a narrow zone of any coordinate system (namely, to the track zone) - on the table (above)
Idea

...overlap the neighbors A+C, especially if they partially intersect.

also good,
as another option to find selectiveentry points.
.......
The completed section represents 2388 spins - that's 41 sessions (without manual play intervention)
.......
And here is my counter question:
Take a mirror (classic) A- B- C- B- A
The goal is to catch A
If you look at it this way, it's essentially a bet on repeat of any number that's expected on 4 spins.
Why, in order to catch this repetition (A) do you have to wait for the middle to appear, namely B- C- B ?
The remaining "middle" options, for example, M- N- P, K- T- R, S- V- L, etc., are, as it were, thrown out of consideration,
although the probability of getting A on the fourth spin is A- M- N- P- A
exactly the same as A- B- C- B- A.
It turns out that the table included the so-called "selected" entry points, while the rest, which were absolutely equal in terms of probability of occurrence, were left out.
Shpilevoy talks about effectiveness, i.e. they catch the eye much brighter than the others.
But in reality there is nothing special behind this brightness. They are not "magnets" of attraction A
Let's say we highlight them anyway (for clarity)
But even with these chosen ones, not everything is so simple. From about six dozen, we need to decide on even more "chosen ones")
An option is to impose additional strategies and determineintersection points.
....
So far I see the following options for action:
1.
according to the principle of setting lines, i.e. a la slots.
for example, select a specific set of entry points, decide on the number of numbers and the betting styleflat progression (soft st)fading
The simplest option is one line, for example, for the first move

Lines can also be placed on the second (2 L), fifth... tenth move, etc.
It's very predictable and straightforward for an adaptive.
If on this path, for example, in a flat, there are solutions up to 35 spins (warm zone), then something will be in the plus, if within 35 spins (neutral) - the result will be the same, but if the solution becomes more frequent beyond 35 spins (cold) - this is a minus game.
It is very good when the selective entry point plays when it has a pronounced accent.
But it is better to refrain from acting in exactly the same way after a fat solution.

2.
Draw a broken line on your prepared template and move in accordance with it.
For an adaptive one, this is already more unpredictable.
But for the player it's still the same guessing game. They will meet on this line of solutions, then
result +, no - minus.
[img width=532,height=499]https://100pravda.com/media/kunena/attachments/175/%D1%88%D0%B0%D 0%B1%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F.png[/img]
This is a more flexible position than just going straight for the first move.
3.
You can stay on one line, but still use the offset tool

This is also an element of unpredictability for adaptability.
You can call it a-la winding up a bonus for yourself, i.e. pulling out the solution from other lines.
4.
This is more complex. The provocative game on the answer is adaptive.

Now I will select numbers from the nearest track zone B into this same table, i.e. B, 2 neighbors on the right, 2 neighbors on the left.
Anyone you meet.
I have already considered a 10-spin block on the entry point two identical numbers on the scoreboard.
Here, there is a mirror and the appearance of two identical numbers on the board.
Let's see what happens, all this is superimposed.
If it is yellow, it is a "bonus" with a multiplication of 35 (bet on one number),
then those highlighted in the frame are "bonus" with a multiplication of 6 (more precisely 6.2) (a bet on five numbers)
All together: A + B and its neighbors (2 on the left + 2 on the right along the track) = a kind of six (a bet on six numbers), i.e.
"bonus" with a multiplication of 5 (more precisely 4.
[img width=673,height=540]https://100pravda.com/media/kunena/attachments/175/%D0%B7%D0%B5%D1%8 0%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%87+%D0%B7%D1%82%D1%80.jpg[/img]
[img width=673,height=530]https://100pravda.com/media/kunena/attachments/175/%D0%B7%D0%B5%D 1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%82%D1%87+%D0%B7%D1%82%D1%80.png[/img]
[img width=673,height=120]https://100pravda.com/media/kunena/attachments/175/%D0%B7%D0%B5%D1%8 0%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%80%D1%87+%D0%B7%D1%82%D1%80.jpg[/img]

Attention is drawn to lines No.25and No.26
With such a mixed (combination) style, Afalls into the zone of track B and, in this place, I think, you can narrow, i.e. pump A to a depth of 10 spins with amplification.
More detailed analysis a little later
(I don't have much free time)
most likely at night)

Shpilevoy replied to the topic A drop from the waterfall of observations of the mining BOT

Alatissa writes: 57 baits at a distance of 2000+ and only one mirror, closed on the first move. (I don't even know how to react to this)

57 entry points into the game with the expectation of 1 specific number = out of 57 spins only 1 guess
normal frequency is 1/37, but
remember the full cycle of the field
1 expected number can come in immediately or after 100+ attempts
in this case he entered on move 15 and then you have 42L = nothing out of the ordinary
//////////////////////
mirrors are among the bright collisions that adaptive likes to show to melt the players' brains ))))
but when there are only visits to the mirror and no realized ones, then today is clearly not a mirror day and there is no point
put too much emphasis on them

Alatissa replied to the topic A droplet from the waterfall of observations of the mining BOT
From the book #Boris Ruban "Casino, slots, roulette"
ABCBA format mirror-axis collision. 203
I have already identified ABCBA in my research, since the BOT has a built-in bet of 1 chip, so as not to miss this collision.
(33 entry points and one classically closed mirror)
+ 1072 back to 1316 (total 2388)
That is, the distance is 2000+ spins.
in order to consider such a characteristic as closeness/distanceof closed mirrors from each other.
as a result, another 24 TV, but I still haven’t waited for the second closed (classic) mirror.
.......

A-B-C-B-A - classic
A- B- C- B- x- A - mirror with one "scratch",
A- B- C- B- x- x- A - mirror with two "scratches",
A- B- C- B- x- x- x- A - ....with three "scratches",
............................................
A- B- C- B- x- x- x- x- x- x- x- x- x- A - with nine "scratches".
......
I rewrote all 57 TV numbers into a table + 10 - a back block of numbers.
If you catch the mirror, i.e. A on the first move,
then this is the first line,
on the second - the second
etc.
The second line turned out to be completely empty (as well as the fifth and eighth)
On the first one there is only 1 A
on the second - 0,
on the third - 3,
fourth - 1
fifth - 0
sixth - 4
seventh - 5
eighth - 0
ninth - 1
tenth - 2
Total - 17
[img width=673,height=540]https://100pravda.com/media/kunena/attachments/175/%D0%B7%D 0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%87.jpg[/img]

[img width=673,height=120]https://100pravda.com/media/kunena/attachments/175/%D0%B7%D 0%B5%D1%80%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%80%D1%87.jpg[/img]
The entry points from 35 to 53 are striking. Not once did A appear, not only on the first (second) move (2L), but also at a depth of 10 spins. Everything is "a ball rolling".
Some TVs overlap each other... but without A
Of course, betting only on the first move is very predictable.
Besides the straight line, there is also a broken line (I mean the transition from one line to another rnd)
Mixed style, skipping moves, etc.
57 decoys at a distance of 2000+ and only one mirror, closed on the first move. (I don't even know how to react to this)

Shpilevoy writes:
1. when the game is on these pinpoint strikes go in a soft stepwise progression
2. if today several times does not play 23-32 (we set not only a mirror but also a repeat of the entry point, always BOTH centers)
a) plays next to any center = we will add a neighbor
b) it doesn't go there at all = we cut it off, silently wait for it to START going there
3. complete = utopia, unjustified risk = nuclear strike instead of a point center, which is in addition to the main line of the game

/////////////////////
signal to complete "I'M READY"

I'll return to the connections and comment
Let's say there is a main line of the game + an additional element
Let this element be 23-32 (I'll start with it)
First, just some stats for 1316 spins:
(after 23 - the first following number)
23-31...23-12...23-29...23-11...23-7...23-12...23-[ b]24[/b]...23-34...23-12...23-23...23-23...23-35...23-2 3...23-8...23-3...23-27...23-23...23-17...23-11 ...23-35...23-27...23-14...23-8...23-7...23-21...
Total 25 entry points = 25 attempts to catch 23-32
On the first move I already showed the statistics: not a single 32 (on the second move: not a single)

1. when the game is going on these pinpoint strikes go in a soft stepwise progression

I wonder what size the bet should be on the 25th move? (if you follow the m/st progression)
Let's say without progression.
I will conduct avirtual game on different options for choosing roads (forks) and will display the financial result for each.
First.
25 attempts: 1 chip on each first move, target 32 = classic
The minimum for this game is 25 chips.
everyone burns
Financial result: -25 chips (loss)
Second.
25 attempts: 1 chip on the first move + 1 chip on the second move (rule 2 L) goal 32
This variant requires a minimum of 50 chips.
everyone burns
Financial result = -50 chips (loss)

a) plays next to any center = we will add a neighbor

Third
25 attempts: 5 chips for each first move, goal 32 + neighbors on the track
This option requires at least 5x25 = 125 chips
everyone burns
Financial result = -125 chips (loss)

if today 23-32 doesn't play several times (we set not only a mirror but also a repeat of the entry point, always BOTH centers)

"Several times doesn't play" - how much is that?

it doesn’t go there at all = we cut it off, silently wait for it to START going in

and when will it start?
I see in the context of this thousand(+) we are talking about almost 3 dozens of non-playing 23-32
But I'll listen:

always BOTH centers

Fourth:
25 attempts: 1 chip on 23 + 1 chip on 32 (all on the first move)
This variant requires at least 2x25 = 50 chips.
I think so.
4 attempts were successful (they are visible in the statistics)
46 chips out of 50 burn out,
4 are saved and bring profit 4x35 = 140 chips
Overall financial result:
net profit (140 - 46) = 94chips
or in other words:
4x36 = 144
144 - 50 =94 chips in plus.
Fifth.
the solution is just to catch the repeat 23 on the first move.
25 attempts: 1 chip only on 23
For this variant 25 chips are enough.
4 successful moves,
21 chips are burned (25 - 4 = 21)
4 saved chips bring profit 4x35 = 140 chips
Overall financial result:
net profit 140 -21 = 119 chips.
or in other words:
4x36 = 144
144 -25 = 119 chips in plus.
Sixth.
the most expensive.
but it can also be considered as an option.
25 attempts: both centers + neighbors on the track(total 10 numbers in the bet) all on the first move.
for this game the minimum is 10x25 = 250 chips.
In this variant 6 attempts are successful.
244 chips are lost, 6 are kept and bring profit 6x35 = 210 chips.
more burned.
Overall financial result: 210 - 244 = -34 (loss)
or in other words:
6x36 = 216
216 - 250 = -34 chips
Seventh.
25 attempts: 5 chips for each first move, goal 23 + neighbors on the track
For this option the minimum is 5x25 = 125 chips.
6 attempts were successful.
119 chips are burned (125 - 6 = 119)
6 are saved and bring profit 6x35 = 210 chips
more than those burned.
Overall financial result:
net profit: 210 - 119 = 91 chip
or in other words:
6x36 = 216
216-125 =91 a plus chip.
You can also consider combined options, for example 32 + a pair of neighbors 23, etc.
And all the same, only not on the first move, but on any other (second, third...tenth)
Roulette is a multi-variant game.
But which option should I choose?
Screenshot from video Boris Ruban
"Ч17. Profit +1000 USD on a mirror with a torn edge"

Here I see Boris expected the closing of such a mirror as ABCVA
And at the entry point ABCB... 7-11-6-11... I bet on 7 (at the same time I was also trying to pick up 6-9)
But here another option emerges, such as ABCDCBA
14-7-11-6-11..., i.e. if 7 came up right after 11, then 14 could also be put up in an attempt to catch the completed look of the mirror.
And so it turned out 14-7-11-6-11-14, where the seven after 11 is really "asking" to be there)
*******************
Yes, there are such interesting moments when one element is missing to completely close the mirror, i.e. it closes earlier than desired.
For example:
12-3-2-2-12 here the number 3 is "asked for" (after the second 2), so that the mirror has a finished look ABCBA

10-24-12-12-10, in this variant the number 24 is for the type ABCCBA,

10-33-29-29-10 - number 33 is "missing" for ABCSVA.

**********************
There is also a combination like ABCCCBA (I have never encountered it in my games)
You can see such an impressive mirror in the photo album InquisitorEA on CMP (open access)

There are also comments from friends:

Atom Mirror /old/ Roulette Mining

Direct repetition, ABA, ABBA, ABAB, CBABC, everything is clear with this.
It is interesting how exactly "new understanding of mirrors" is captured.

Everything happens at three points of the track in the recent history ON THE SCOREBOARD and at two points of the track now.
The combination 7-28 fell out, this is L1.
We search deep in history for the inversion of this R1 throw.
Found it. Let's see what predicate was before it. Let's say, L12.
The forecast includes the number from the current one, by inversion to L12, i.e. R12.
Visually it looks like this: (forecast R12)-(now L1)-..............-(was R1)-(before it L12)-......

For the most complete picture of the work (as an exception), we present part of the program in the simple algorithmic language Pascal:

For convenience, we added a predicate layout to the spider (as well as numbers on the board from new to old):