Scientists have calculated which casino roulette player is better

A=B=C... if you don't take into account the words "initial" and "built up"...
The main thing is missing here - the time from the moment of deposit to the moment of withdrawal of funds. Without these roulettements - skills cannot be rouletted, only a random result.
Of course, we don't take into account the betting limits on the roulette table.
There is a difference between the initial 0.6*ХА)=60 and the initial 100*ХВ)=10000, therefore ХА) is not equal to ХВ).
Another thing is that over a period of, for example, 1 year, player A) made 100 HA, and player B) - no more than three HA).
Then the playing skill of player A) is twice as high as the playing skill of player B).

DLK wrote: A) From a loan of $0.60 I received a balance of $60.
B) From a loan of $10, the balance became $1000.
B) The initial $100 increased to $10,000.

There is not enough data. To find out which is better, you need to know the turnover of each, by which you can calculate ROI = financial result / turnover. Whoever has a higher ROI is better. The time spent does not matter. With one caveat, that quite a lot of spins were played.
One player, let's say, guessed 3 times $100 on the odds and tripled his capital. And another doubled $50 for 100 spins when betting on splits and raised $100. But this does not mean that the first one is better, he was just lucky. Rather, the second one is better.

according to the theory Alt is right = many spins + the smaller the turnover, then with the same relative increase in credit, the minimalist wins

/////////////////////////

as for me, in the ranking of the best in first place is B) = high roller
their multiplication is the same, but all other things being equal, from practice 100%, the higher the stakes, the greater the resistance of the casino adaptive...
i.e. from $1 you can jump to $10 and they will also help you))))
but to crawl out of $1000 to 10K = the casinos will lie down and resist = fantastic things will happen on the roulette in terms of throwing your bets, throwing off your rhythm, changing dealers, canceling bets, canceling spins for fictitious reasons, etc. )))

and when it comes to payment, the casino will suddenly "find" a multi-account or will write in the rules a ban on playing "by strategy" = they will cancel the payment and ban the account... but that's another story about goat scams that are advertised by all sorts of faggots like TTR and blond AG

Player "B" is the most correct. He is not a high roller "C" - he is not under the close attention of the casino. He does not play for small "A", so his earnings have weight.

ROI for roulette is not calculated and as far as I know in poker, where they are trying hard to promote it, no one takes into account every ante bet and insurance.

ROI (Return of Investment) is an important characteristic of a tournament player, showing the relative effectiveness of his game. The concept of ROI is mainly applicable to the evaluation of MTT and SnG players. For cash players, a similar characteristic is win rate.

Win rate is the average success rate of a cash player, which is expressed in BB/100. Basically, winrate reflects the amount of money a player wins on average every 100 hands.

Maybe to compare roulette players they use something like the absolute total of the game how much cash does a player win on average every 100 spins?

In my circle of seasoned roulette fans, it is customary to roulette penises based on how much each earns €/hour .
The average indicator for the month is taken, there are both short and long games, it takes into account where there was luck and where there were downstreaks. In order to increase your hourly income you need to be able to make money faster and play bigger.

As for poker players, win rates, etc., these are vile machinations of casino AFFILIATES and PARTNERS. Their task is to confuse people's minds and draw them into long (for months, years) and useless games -

When playing online poker, you need to focus on long-term results and pay less attention to the short-term results of the current session.

They will dilute contradictory theories into 10 thick volumes and say that it will only work after 100,000 hands played. Suckers are taken in and spend years losing decent amounts of money at micro-limits. I have nothing against poker as entertainment in your company, but as a way to earn money - poker is a waste of time.

We can also be accused of getting people to play roulette And CMP is covered with affiliate links.

But we always say that every roulette session is a small battle (within one long-run battle) and must be won! No 100'000 spins for a result. Moreover, if you can't play in the plus, then after 10-20 games in the minus you don't need to play for money at all! Wait for the plus bot CMP and we will bomb different casinos together.