Many questions from players, not only those who use the Roulette Mining program. If we omit the technical side of the forecasts, let's look at the overall BRM and the dynamics of the loan movement.
The player made a deposit of $100 and went to the casino roulette.
1) You can't play too small = you'll flounder +/-50 and you definitely won't be able to win 10 games out of 10.
2) You can't play too big = powerful hooks (3-move) are only acceptable if you have a serious game fund and the current deposit is a small part of it. A kind of piece of the money reserve allocated for the game. It's even better when the hook is made from "extra" positive money. Several big hits do not give the distance for the positional struggle to fully manifest itself = it's a guessing game of whether you were lucky or not. The calculation is that the adaptive will have time to reflex = will encourage such madness and give a collision, will not let you out of the game quickly.
3) In normal play (betting width and pressure) the key point can be considered x2 of the deposit. Many players choose every new +100$ as the key point (for the corresponding scale of the game).
When you reach a key point, you need to make a number of decisions that will affect future events.
4) Should we continue or not?
In this matter I am always a supporter of CONTINUING. Nobody knows where the limit of today's PLUS is! Maybe it's the same day as yesterday at Vova's dentist's, who with $10 on Poker Stars in a day brought his balance to $890 in raids. If he had thought stop-win, he would have stopped at $50 and screwed up such a fabulous period of goodwill.
How critical is money in the game, how important is every new +100$ to you. If I have a specific problem on the ground for 300$, then as soon as I win these 300$ I will put them on withdrawal. This is important!
"Free floating" to the cosmic heights occurs in a free mode, not burdened by the current everyday life. For example, to deposit $10-50 in a casino with the purpose of having a pleasant time for the next 2-3 hours.
5) When to brake?
After each new MAX credit you should fix a REASONABLE LOWER BAR stop-loss. When this bar is reached = ALWAYS EXIT.
What does it depend on?
Again = how critical is money in the game, how important is every new +$100 to you. If I have a specific problem on the ground for $300, then I will PRESS UP my stop loss in every possible way. If the game is in free mode = I understand that the stakes are growing and I will slowly raise the stop loss so that there is more working leverage.
/////////////////////////////
Example of a session almost up to x5 and stop loss at x2.
to continue or not? === to continue!
further to the stars, but the game didn't go well (it became tight, a ceiling appeared)
=== stop loss at x2 === an attempt to reach x10 is now dominant for me as a goal to see such an opportunity from the current version of RM, therefore stop loss at the acceptable lower limit for such a rise...
/////////////////
these ups and downs end with a clear thought "YOU PLAYED, HAD FUN, MADE x2 OF THE INVESTED MONEY, EVERYTHING IS GOOD."
over time, when you get used to the typical swaying of the waves, you already clearly know where the normal stop=win is, and where the normal stop=loss is
/////////////////////
normal is statistically justified by your specific experience...
example with a slot machine=
entrance 1000
in 20% you won't even see +1 you'll lose all your money
in 55% you will see +400 and then lose all your money
in 20% you will see +800+1100 and then you will lose all the money
at 5% you will see +2500+5500 and then you will lose all the money
when you have such a layout of your games in your head, it is not difficult to develop an optimal BRM strategy = what and when to do correctly ))))
Topic Author
