4 numbers on casino roulette and the norm of probability

For a game without adaptive, it doesn’t matter at all whether there will be 4 random numbers in the bets or any fixed ones.









The dynamics for static bet numbers 1,2,3,4 are no different from random 4 numbers each spin.

Did you know?

We select 4 numbers out of 37 according to the rule of multiplication of successive actions:

1 number - 37 options
2 number - 36 options
3 number - 35 options
4 number - 34 options to choose from

N = 37*36*35*34 = 1'585'080 combinations of 4 numbers, excluding permutations.

Since the order of numbers in the group is not important for the bet (2,3,30,17 = 17,2,30,3), then the combinatorics combination formula:

We can choose 4 numbers out of 37 without repetitions With ⁴ 37 = 37! / (4! * (37-4)!) = 66'045 ways.

Let's simplify the task and consider only the cones on the field: 1/5, 2/6, 4/8, 5/9, etc.
It is necessary to establish monitoring and divide them into three groups according to loss: within the normal range, undershoot and overshoot.

Task: to determine the markers for entering the game and the forecast mechanism so that in 500 spins the bets bring the balance to plus.

The idea is to organize a way out of the hole by increasing/decreasing the bet, as well as a constant search for cones that are developing in the bust zone.

I showed this formula of the Swiss Bernoulli four months ago, then a week ago.
But you ignore it.
And the fact that the binomial distribution that you've gotten into is completely useless was also explained

Alatissa wrote: I showed this formula of the Swiss Bernoulli four months ago, then a week ago.
But you ignore it.
And the fact that the binomial distribution, which you got into, was also completely useless to explain

We don't ignore! We quietly take note! )))))

Can you tell me how the topic of issue four differs from the topic of issue three?
The same thing over and over again
We didn't direct our attention to sha256 with Alt,
but we were talking about the binomial distribution.

DLK wrote: Let's simplify the task and consider only the cones on the field: 1/5, 2/6, 4/8, 5/9, etc.
It is necessary to establish monitoring and divide them into three groups according to loss: within the normal range, undershoot and overshoot.
Task: to determine the markers of entry into the game and the forecast mechanism so that in 500 spins the bets bring the balance into the plus.

No school combinatorics will show the markers of entry. You can't defeat mathematics with the help of the same mathematics. It's like trying to pull yourself out of the swamp by your hair. Without a fulcrum it won't work anyway. And combinatorics will not and cannot give such a fulcrum. On the contrary, it is like a primary source, and everything else follows from it.