Bet on final numbers (casino online roulette)

It is customary to play for the "finals" of numbers according to the track, in the form of oral bets to the dealer.
In fact, we place ordinary neighbors (chips in multiples of 5), but in a rather peculiar way.

Any numbers end with a certain digit. A set of roulette numbers that have the same ending are grouped into a corresponding final. For example, the finals of the four are 4, 14, 24, 34.

But there is a certain arrangement of some endings on the wheel that makes betting on them attractive to many players:

"Finals of twos" - these are 4 columns of neighbors on 2, 12, 22, 32. They completely cover the large series and close the edges of 17, 9, 31.

"Finals of the small series of threes" - these are 3 neighbors in numbers 13, 23, 33. It completely covers the entire small series and insures the edges: 1, 20, 6.

If you simply say "Final Threes", the dealer will place 13, 23, 33 and add the neighbor 3 to the zero-spiel. So be careful when placing your call bets.

An alternative to oral bets is to play finals on the roulette field. Personally, I like to link adjacent finals with splits, for example 1/4, 11/14, 21/24, 31/34. Four chips can hold 2 full sets of finals at once.

Well, let's say the standard finals are by the last digit, then Zero is (0)37,10,20,30?
Another question is how are the finals tied to the generation? Or are they not tied at all? Then, you somehow suggested in the video that the finals can be not only standard or Pythagorean, but also any combination of numbers sequentially equidistant from each other on the track, in the same order as the finals themselves. What to do with them then? Maybe for the finals we should allocate a central number - a starting point - let's say the minimum in value and count the number of sectors from it in clockwise mode (including or not including the next one on the list)? After all, it is the location of the bet on the track with amplification along the field that is important, and not the numbers themselves that correspond to this location. Or maybe I am complicating the perception? Although in terms of the orientation of the location, the universality of the bet by the location of sectors by the coordinates of distance is the first step to American roulette! The pattern of the web - the "path" of the bet bypass, calculated and proposed by the adaptive, may not be tied to the numbers, i.e. has a coordinate system tied to bets and the size of the loss in specific places on the track, linked by the number of sectors between them - this is one version of the answer to the question of why the bet misses in a specific spin!