☄ Collection of strategies for casino roulette from Shpilevoy

the game options with a hot street are starting to slowly stall.... everyone is familiar with this situation, when the strategy stops working effectively

= it is necessary to slightly modify the fading strategy, the adaptor will have to look for a new algorithm for counter-scheme, because within the series of CC casinos cannot throw bets



in the generation of roulette numbers there are always some global waves of distortions + adaptive breathing =
that's why there is a constant process of mutations of the basic set of keys = does it stop working? let's cut it down a bit )))


we take "interception of simplest collisions" and put it into the game




combining collision interception centers and a simplified version of "hot street"



what "sixline"? street of course ))))

///////////////////////

we get the next 5-10-15 cycles of reaching the next maximum of credit= breathed life into an outdated approach

since the betting field is quite wide, the credit increases are not high
nevertheless, half an hour +$100 is a normal growth rate for microdeposits and even then there are "bottlenecks"

///////////////////
so little by little, little by little



so as not to miss the stop-loss in the game (the initial deposit is already x4) = each time I enter only the portion of the working leverage that I am ready to lose = see the finstrip in these videos

as soon as I don't emerge at the next MAX in the next cycle, I will issue a withdrawal of the winnings
= I can leave something for a new game from the minuses, and the top for the map

I call this approach "VAMPIRE'S KISS" = sometimes for weeks (!) from a deposit of 100 I withdraw +10 +20 +80 +20 +15 +30 ....

..... and often such sub-takes will much faster and easier score +1000 than to pull and roll the total amount. The larger the deposit and stakes, the stronger the resistance of the adaptive.

It turns out that special omissions of possible numbers that are not related to the scenario are strictly observed even in the case of their (the numbers) obvious loss? Is this the rule of success?

Boris! You started to squeeze to 7-8 loss rebets, why not 2L or 3L? And the second point, you have plus one minus one and chess, but you don’t even bet for insurance specifically? For example 23-22 and then 25-26, why not bet 24-26, why only 24? Only then, when it already worked, you started to catch up with the departing tram on the rails to jump on the next stop... Let's say this is a hidden verification of the loss position, but the session scenario and the session response to the scenario, they may not necessarily be conjugated, the response may be in a session or in two sessions... How did you know that the adaptive swallowed the bait?

the casino has 2 options = either to disperse something, or to create a web

////////////////
The basis of this strategy is HOT SIXLINE
additional centers appear in the process = when a center falls out, it is strengthened and +/-1 are built up from it along the track

+ one-time inclusions on direct collisions such as flips or super-hot 3+1 on the scoreboard

the work cycle continues until the next maximum credit is reached

continuation 100pravda.com/forum/all-bot-session/536-...zino?start=795#24472
/////////////////////

static combines = my love ))))

In theory, we play a hot split at the beginning. Credit growth cycles.
When this strategy stops working, we play collision interception. Credit growth cycles.
When the second strategy stops working, we play a combined one: hot split and collision interception. Also in cycles.

Excellent. I am interested in exactly that part of adaptive work, when strategies stop working. What are these numbers? When Suddenly everything stopped working... How exactly is Evil adaptive expressed, because it is at this moment that Adaptive is 100 percent predictable. Steven Spielberg in the film Minority Report accurately outlined the predictability of human actions - "Who is Leo Crowe? - I have no idea, but for some reason I have to kill him in 36 hours... Samples don't see what you want to do, samples see what you will do..."