☄ Collection of strategies for casino roulette from Shpilevoy

It turns out that special omissions of possible numbers that are not related to the scenario are strictly observed even in the case of their (the numbers) obvious loss? Is this the rule of success?

the game options with a hot street are starting to slowly stall.... everyone is familiar with this situation, when the strategy stops working effectively

= it is necessary to slightly modify the fading strategy, the adaptor will have to look for a new algorithm for counter-scheme, because within the series of CC casinos cannot throw bets



in the generation of roulette numbers there are always some global waves of distortions + adaptive breathing =
that's why there is a constant process of mutations of the basic set of keys = does it stop working? let's cut it down a bit )))


we take "interception of simplest collisions" and put it into the game




combining collision interception centers and a simplified version of "hot street"



what "sixline"? street of course ))))

///////////////////////

we get the next 5-10-15 cycles of reaching the next maximum of credit= breathed life into an outdated approach

since the betting field is quite wide, the credit increases are not high
nevertheless, half an hour +$100 is a normal growth rate for microdeposits and even then there are "bottlenecks"

///////////////////
so little by little, little by little



so as not to miss the stop-loss in the game (the initial deposit is already x4) = each time I enter only the portion of the working leverage that I am ready to lose = see the finstrip in these videos

as soon as I don't emerge at the next MAX in the next cycle, I will issue a withdrawal of the winnings
= I can leave something for a new game from the minuses, and the top for the map

I call this approach "VAMPIRE'S KISS" = sometimes for weeks (!) from a deposit of 100 I withdraw +10 +20 +80 +20 +15 +30 ....

..... and often such sub-takes will much faster and easier score +1000 than to pull and roll the total amount. The larger the deposit and stakes, the stronger the resistance of the adaptive.

FoxDuhovny wrote: Boris! You started pushing to 7-8 loss rebets, why not 2L or 3L?

because these are static combines, there is a development of the betting field and the expectation of a positive turn of the dispa
= within the framework of the KCh series and low claims, such an approach can stay afloat for a long time

FoxDuhovny wrote: you have plus one minus one and chess playing, but you don't even bet specifically for insurance? For example 23-22 and then 25-26, why not bet 24-26, why only 24? Only then, when it already worked, you started to catch up with the departing tram on the rails in order to jump on at the next stop...

each "key" is a separate strategy
when I play a specific strategy, I even see parallel good options for other approaches =
I DON'T JERK, because any strategy needs to be pushed to a positive phase
and this is concentrated TIME + MONEY

I took on the task, don't say I can't handle it )))

instead of a bunch of disparate backups, it is better to have several spare moves or strengthen the main branch of the game

//////////////////
there I didn't "start to catch up with the tram", but according to the situation marker I moved into a PLANNED development of the streets

////////////////////////////////////
this is my +/-1 from the center through N successful microcycles slightly angered adaptive



5-33-14-22

in fact, it's L2-L2-L2-L2 on the track = super gift? no, it's the answer-climb "OVER THE BOARD" +/- 1 from the dropped one

in this situation (I didn't catch it, although I saw it perfectly) = the credit in the game didn't allow me to connect anything else

33 in the first video segment is collected on the return "descent from the parabolic", in the second - collision 24, specially prepared in advance by one of the scenarios that we do not see, but the adaptive remembers it from history. To unscrew this, you need several methodical scenarios of the game under the combine... As for the attenuation mode - the usual adaptive practice of using answers with motives is to encourage an increase in the rate in attacking modes, in which loss traps are prepared. What is needed here is not so much a withdrawal of money, as to impose another passive uphill with small barely noticeable bursts of activity where they have never been, so that the adaptive switches to their calculation due to its protective modes...

Did you catch the golden train in black cars 11-22-33? Or did you miss it on purpose, so as not to anger the adaptive? And what happens when the adaptive gets angry? Does it interfere with the current generation? In that case, my adaptive is ALWAYS angry...