☄ Collection of strategies for casino roulette from Shpilevoy

I played this bet for two days locomotive and then it disappeared !! At first it was +++++ and then

---

!!!! It seems to be adaptive !!

If a player (strategist, pro...anyone) cannot explain two simple choices:
- why the bet won in a particular spin,
- why the bet lost in a particular spin,
then his bets are made intuitively, the casino's (adaptive) goodwill has absolutely nothing to do with it...
However, the casino's benevolence, as it is commonly called on the forum, certainly exists, this is explained by reasons that have nothing to do with a specific player, so benevolence can be called conditionally...
Goodwill has a limited resource or time period (like a warranty period for a new car of 100K kilometers or 3 years, whichever comes first) - this is the time or (and) the level of return (acceptable losses), usually timed to a certain date (similar to discounts on Black Friday). The task of any pro is to determine the level of such goodwill and try to use the entire resource allocated for this, in his favor, earlier than statistical players do.

Square-Nest Strategy
////////////////////////////


the fact that I'm lazy and love rebet statics (combine) = I don't hide it ))))
the important question in this video is WHERE?
i.e. how to determine that very block of 4 numbers, which then to develop....

///////////////
Preparation stage

1) I spin the backs, outlining dynamic dozens (4 streets) within which the last two numbers fall out
if they fall far = not suitable
if they fall close = then the virtual dozen can be "stretched", because it consists of two = the maximum left and maximum right (which capture both dropped numbers)

2) when there is such a dozen
I mark it and LOOK where within its framework the 3rd spin will fall = to the left or to the right?
in fact it will be a small collision = 3 spins in a row plays a block on the field of 12 numbers

3) if number 3 flies away, I start point 1
if the 3rd number came in, then you can start playing, remember L or R for it within the block

//////////////////////////////
Game

1) I twist my back, waiting for 2 numbers within a block of 12 numbers
2) in the corresponding CORNER of this block (L/R) on HOT COLUMNS I hammer in 4 numbers (coner) and support them with sixlines and straights = INITIAL POSITION for the rebet combine
3) CHILDREN WITH INCREASE to WIN+++
a) if the ball falls next to the field
b) if the ball falls next to the track
c) B/W numbers (via board) I also connect to this rate
for example, "32" is killed, and 15 falls = added 15, 19 falls = added 19, 5 falls = move without a bet, far from everything that is worth it
4) CENTER W+++ entered from the beginning of p.1
but! if you didn't pump the stakes correctly, the winnings might not even return "to your own", I would continue to hold this setup (maybe I would slightly lower the stakes and then increase them) to see at least +1$ to the last maximum of the credit...

////////////////////////////
What's the point?
= as usual, x2 deposit
+ develop the right STYLE of play = feel the DISTANCES AND DEGREE OF PRESS, when the probabilities of individual blocks are collected into the desired W+++ and carry the credit to the next stage of growth....
+ interception of "near" throws
+ wave of dispersion (immediately or with subsidence)
+ dynamics of location change after W+++ (in the video "had to" return to the same arrangement)

///////////////////
Inspirers ))))
1) Mira and Andrey's conversation about the "two" strike = wide 1 and narrow 2
2) alt2005 about geometric distribution of repetitions = any number "tries" to repeat itself as quickly as possible
3) I love rebets
4) the proverb "any house is built on 4 corners" = a cone on hot columns as the basis of the "construction" )))

Go for it, Shpilevoy! I'm still building a convenient protocol and trying a special limit scenario, but so far without success... only suspicions are growing, however, collisions and repetitions, after winning from 1.1 bets 7.2 happened, as you said unexpectedly and very cunningly, I missed and of course missed, although I intuitively understood and saw this moment, but did not find what to tie this layout to, until I found... however, special bets are tough, if they are made not 30 spins, as in my case, but 300 or 600, then it will be possible to calculate the moments in more detail... I'm thinking of including in special bets a separate track layout with a spread of three or four centers at 120 and 90 degrees and moving them with 5-6 rebets, changing directions and alternating the number according to the even-odd system (4 or 3 centers), respectively...

As for the cone, it is not a problem to squeeze out a specific one, planned in advance for 5-6 sessions, the question is not where (which cone), the question is in what spin (place) the adaptive uses it? This is the first question, but there is a main question - what shift in spins will the adaptive choose in the next cycle, with the methodical squeezing out of the next cone?

Boris! You started to squeeze to 7-8 loss rebets, why not 2L or 3L? And the second point, you have plus one minus one and chess, but you don’t even bet for insurance specifically? For example 23-22 and then 25-26, why not bet 24-26, why only 24? Only then, when it already worked, you started to catch up with the departing tram on the rails to jump on the next stop... Let's say this is a hidden verification of the loss position, but the session scenario and the session response to the scenario, they may not necessarily be conjugated, the response may be in a session or in two sessions... How did you know that the adaptive swallowed the bait?