Marigny de Grillet System (Casino Roulette Strategy)

Can someone explain "He played a breakout, serial or distribution ekart on a partial call."?

Eckart - deviations from the norm.
Serial - this is when there is a repetition of a chance - a series of KKKKKKK or CCCCCCCCCCCCCC

"intermittent" - ?
"or" - ??
"distribution" - ???
"on partial equalization" - ????

***

The only thing that comes to mind related to odds and figures is that many players are caught on odds.

KKKK HHH KKKK - ... then they catch HHH

To HHHH To - ... HHHH

KK CHCH KK - ...CHCH

This kind of, I would say, "symmetries" or "logical continuations" rather than figures.

Marigny de Grillet, who in 1926 used the law of series formation and came up with a method that has 10 - 15% advantages over the bank. He played interrupted, serial or distribution ekart on partial equalization.

Yes, I heard about it about 15 years ago, when I didn’t understand anything yet. And I believed it.
But...there are no alignments on the steering wheel. Only relative ones, and that's nothing.

Play mainly by figures, that is, comparing the results of several spins with a figure or group of figures.

I saw such skaters in Wiesbaden. An old man sits with a notebook and writes something in it. Draws figures. But roulette is not Shishkin and not even Malevich. The only thing it can draw is this painting by Repin "They've Arrived"
And the old man keeps drawing figures. The girls from the staff are jumping around him. They bring him hamburgers, coffee and all sorts of delicacies. As long as he plays. So he finishes drawing the figure, places it and loses. He needs to keep drawing, not stop there. No one is stopping him. On the contrary, the casinos really like such old men.

The grandfathers are old, and their population is gradually decreasing :( But never mind. The women will still give birth (c) ...

Shpilevoy wrote: I'll add it right away for clarity and convenience )))

//////////////////////////////

If we consider simple accelerations of equal chance/dozen/column as a micro collision, including all sorts of geometric things like a Christmas tree, then you can quite successfully play in plus using a competent progression and anti-martin even on the smallest micro deposits, naturally this only applies to roulettes with kc, on other roulettes at your own risk.

Niko wrote:
If we consider simple accelerations of equal chance/dozen/column as a micro collision, including all sorts of geometric things like a Christmas tree, then you can quite successfully play in the plus using a competent progression and anti-martin even on the smallest micro deposits, naturally this only applies to roulettes with kch, on other roulettes at your own risk.

We have a lot of people playing like this in our earthly casinos.
There are people who come from poker when they see a lot of one color on the board. They bet $25-$50 in the same color and tell the dealers - "4 times all together with the winnings, move to the same color." They go back to poker, the dealer calls them if it worked out.
It happens and not infrequently!

Mira wrote:
We have a lot of people playing like this in our earthly casinos.
There are people who come from poker when they see a lot of one color on the board. They bet $25-$50 in the same color and tell the dealers - "4 times all together with the winnings, move to the same color." They go back to poker, the dealer calls them if it worked out.
It happens and not rarely!

It turns out to be a cool automation of the process)

I came to roulette after a video where they taught me how to play martin in a garbage dump and when he started to beat me hard, I started to pay attention to acceleration.
In the profit, the collisions on the chances are longer on 99 spins, and I also noticed that if the line of one chance passed, then with a high probability it will end with a long Christmas tree.
And when we move away from precise bets to numbers, the adaptive does not forget to please with collisions by numbers.