☄ alt2005 reveals the math behind roulette and answers questions

I suggest going from the general to the specific. For simplicity, you can start looking for patterns at the level of dozens: 1-2-3. Then move on to sixlines, streets, splits, arbitrary blocks of numbers and specifically to single numbers.

NUM D
29 - 3
31 - 3
20 - 2
23 - 2
26 - 3
11 - 1
7 - 1
6 - 1
22 - 2
10 - 1
6 - 1
22 - 2
9 - 1
7 - 1
17 - 2
25 - 3
5 - 1
7 - 1
29 - 3
33 - 3
28 - 3
35 - 3
7 - 1
18 - 2
0 - 0
29 - 3
0 - 0
21 - 2
25 - 3
24 - 2

26 - 3
9 - 1
0 - 0
36 - 3
0 - 0
14 - 2
10 - 1
26 - 3
36 - 3
17 - 2
25 - 3
31 - 3
1 - 1
28 - 3
31 - 3
36 - 3
17 - 2
29 - 3
29 - 3
7 - 1
18 - 2
10 - 1
24 - 2
22 - 2
36 - 3
21 - 2
16 - 2
27 - 3
4 - 1
26 - 3

14 - 2
0 - 0
8 - 1
26 - 3
30 - 3
7 - 1
8 - 1
30 - 3
4 - 1
15 - 2
2 - 1
15 - 2
3 - 1
22 - 2
8 - 1
14 - 2
15 - 2
24 - 2
1 - 1
0 - 0
27 - 3
21 - 2
2 - 1
32 - 3
3 - 1
17 - 2
18 - 2
28 - 3
3 - 1
24 - 2

The concept of "number repetition" is a special case.
I propose to move on to the more general case of "any guessed number".

In theory, all alt2005 calculations are also applicable to any guessed number. In its sample, alt2005 started counting between pairs of identical numbers, and in the general case, counting can be started from the moment the forecast is formed.

Mathematics tells us that we can guess any number from 0-37 with absolutely equal chances of success, because the numbers that came up in the past do not affect the numbers that came up in the future.

But experience, the son of difficult mistakes, tells us that a lot depends on the ability to GUESS numbers. It is very stupid to take numbers out of thin air. There are models that allow you to "be in trend", "catch collisions", "ignore the cold", "take into account adaptive responses", etc., which allows you to increase your efficiency.

If "17" hasn't appeared in the last 50 spins, what's the point of betting on it?

I would like to understand the factors and markers that, contrary to dry mathematics, will allow us to be harmonious in understanding the generation of spins.

about adaptive, watch a short video, as for me everything is obvious ))) and when there are too many of these fuck-ups per square meter of your game, it means that the adaptive syringe was shoved up your ass and they want to suck out all your money or, on the contrary (too bad it's rare) to throw credit up )))) they have serious algorithms there and full control of the game of all participants )))

Hello.
Well, I don't perceive it as negative. Rather, I treat everything with humor. Alt2005 is generally not a conflict person)))) The main thing is that things get done.
Due to the late hour, I will write briefly for now. You are actually talking about machinations on the part of the casino. And I am just trying to dig up something, based on the fact that there are no manipulations with the ball. That is, without adaptive. But even if everything is honest, it is very difficult to find a consistently positive strategy (if at all possible). Mathematics itself is against the player, and it is difficult to argue with this lady.

I need to refresh the concept of "distance distribution" in order to discuss
which I will do with pleasure

OK, I'll come back and refresh this concept in a few days. It's actually quite simple. But it's the apparent simplicity that's insidious.

P.S. Katala was banned by RKN. I don't want to use a proxy. Although it's strange, you can access it from a mobile Internet (but not always). By the way, Olynes is also present there.

Hello!!!!
don't take my statements as negative, especially towards you ))))
I'm very glad that you found this site where the casinos really want to win

//////////////////////

Distribution of distances is a mathematical phenomenon, and statistically confirmed a thousand times. Unlike the so-called adaptive, which no one has ever seen. And even the most amiable Mr. Shpilevoy himself will hardly be able to say from specific statistics whether there is an adaptive or not.

in fact, if you watch some generation and don't know the stakes during the game = you're right, the presence of an adaptive can only be predicted indirectly... for example, we see a frozen small series and assume that it is there that someone got stuck with their progressions, and they throw him over until the money runs out or he lowers the stakes several times (goes out of the return zone to his own)....
but when you play and place bets yourself, then the ADAPTIVE can be easily traced by too frequent throws of "nae$kam" (especially on levs, pneumatics, etc., where there are trajectories of exit from the bolt track) =
a) they knock the ball into the middle of your sector and push it behind your last standing neighbor
b) they post the previous fat one to you as soon as you leave it
c) you see violations of the laws of physics in the trajectories (going off at 90 degrees, flying around the canoe over the top, sticking in the pocket and unsticking before a new spin, sudden emergence of additional energy when the current one fades... = you can see a lot of things on charged roulettes)
etc.

///////////////////////////////////

I need to refresh the concept of "distance distribution" to discuss
which I will do with pleasure

////////////////////
what wind blew you to Katala? except for trolling + black PR of all significant topics about casinos with further extortion of money for deleting shit topics, there was never anything good there... and especially useful FOR PLAYERS )))

Greetings alt2005 and all miners!

The question is what to base forecasts on.

It is a mistake to think about leveling out the distortions of the entire system.

The alignment takes place, but it far exceeds the player's expectations in time. You play 100-200 spins, you see that the 3rd dozen clearly dominates in places and there is a clear bias in throws in its direction.

It is correct to use the existing trend, rather than go against the facts of the session and expect that the 3rd dozen has already exceeded the plan and will now freeze.

1) The market almost always goes beyond the wildest expectations of the participants.
2) The alignment can be very extended in time (for example, over the next 1000 spins) and practically imperceptible to the eye.

P.S. All roads lead to Rim.