☄ Examples of successful strategies for playing the wheel

Casinos thrive on delusions and illusions.
They couldn't make a profit if people knew the truth about what worked and what didn't work.

Here is an example of a player's misconception.
Let's say there were 1000 players using the same system in different casinos, each of whom did not know each other. Now after a week of play, the collective results are:
48% of players win a total of $480,000. These players are confident that they have a winning system.
52% of players lose a total of $500,000. These players go back to the drawing board and start working on a new system.

The casino makes $20,000 in profit and doesn't care who wins or loses. They want more losers than winners. But the casino needs winners to keep hope alive, so players keep coming back. The winnings paid out are the casino's investment.

Keep in mind that I was once one of those duped losers. I won most of the time and thought I had beaten the roulette. I thought I had a winning strategy and could milk the casino without much effort. But the delusion was revealed as I continued to play.

Mira wrote: For a roulette system to work, there must be a reason why it works.

It sounds simple enough, but most people blindly test it, hoping that there is some unknown principle or secret they have discovered that allows them to win.

Shpilev and I have already demonstrated examples of successful play from professionals. Alt2005 has watched our games more than once. But no one draws any conclusions?
Yes! There is a reason to win. Like in sports or war. With or without crutches. But never without soul and without brains)))
Attention:
1) BRM.
2) Dynamics of Strategies.
3) Tuning into the casino's current play style.

EVERYONE! =)

"Shpilev and I... have already done it more than once" - I don't argue that you have skill! I'll quote a line from the film "The Devil's Advocate" - "The race wasn't bad, Kevin, but no one has ever managed to win their whole life."
In other words, despite the methodology outlined in three books and the videos watched many times, no one has managed to repeat what Shpilevoy shows! - hence the remark "...there were no guarantees, when 22 showed up I would have given more that b/w 18 or 9 would come up next... the blow was concentrated on this three."
To focus a blow - a single shot, you need to assume that at least two or three factors are present:
1. "... so that the adaptive one "forgets" how he was tricked."
2. adaptive "obediently" calculates the player's intentions and is in a defensive position, i.e. does not use deep statistical processing.
3. The adaptive was tested by the player for linear defense - defense along the track.
If at least one of the three factors is not taken into account, then at the moment of attack - concentration of the blow in a narrow sector, the adaptive will throw a pre-prepared number from the passive zone, i.e. not over the side and in some cases it will be exactly the "last car"...

"Shpilev and I... have already done it more than once" - I don't argue that you have skill! I'll quote a line from the film "The Devil's Advocate" - "The race wasn't bad, Kevin, but no one has ever managed to win their whole life."
In other words, despite the methodology outlined in three books and the videos watched many times, no one has managed to repeat what Shpilevoy shows! - hence the remark "...there were no guarantees, when 22 showed up I would have given more that b/w 18 or 9 would come up next... the blow was concentrated on this three."
To focus a blow - a single shot - you need to assume that at least two or three factors are taken into account:
1. "... so that the adaptive one "forgets" how he was tricked."
2. adaptive "obediently" calculates the player's intentions and is in a defensive position, i.e. does not use deep statistical processing.
3. The adaptive was tested by the player for linear defense - defense along the track.
If at least one of the three factors is not taken into account, then at the moment of attack - concentration of the blow in a narrow sector, the adaptive will throw a pre-prepared number from the passive zone, i.e. not over the side and in some cases it will be exactly the "last car"...

Accidentally duplicated at the time of editing and time stamps! Sorry!

you can always "execute" something on the roulette wheel
the question is that the adaptive module will miss this and not create a counter-circuit....

1) fresh "key"
2) dynamics
3) match the pressure/scale of bets with the money supply
4) reasonable fluctuation of the dispa in your direction
5) change the key



for example, this way you can play anywhere (on the ground with a dealer, pneumatic roulettes, online drawing games) = it will be professional

video without voice commentary = everything is clear anyway = I play the geometry of throws on the field, I collect no more than 5 nearby templates from the last number = I pull until I pump the display to x2
... if the long-awaited win did not bring the balance to x2, then a cut and a new cycle based on fresh statistics are a must