Casino Game Strategies Kit

Each generation is opened by its own keys. Generations consist of sections, each with its own 2-3 keys.

Different casinos have their own RNG features, so it is better to have different sets of keys for the nature of a particular roulette.

Universal master keys exist, so there may be strategies in nature that will beat heterogeneous generations.





Start of discussion Mira , on November 29 12:18
Answers

Offer
Show all
FoxDuhovny, 01.12.2017 15:14
FoxSpiritual
Mira. I have confirmation that the adaptive draws a strictly defined concept of priorities from the history of more than 5 thousand spins... I cannot yet confirm that such depth has a dependent periodicity, but I am sure that for me it is a matter of time and technical support...
Mira, 01.12.2017 11:37
Mira
Adaptive won't do counter-scheme generation for your game 5000 spins ago. What matters is how you play now.
Try to reduce the data to fresh 100-200 spins and try your matrix on them.
Even if some data is missing, you will make dummy moves until clear priorities emerge.
FoxDuhovny, 30.11.2017 07:07
FoxSpiritual
I support! I have practically built a universal diagnostic matrix for creating specific keys for specific software, since my capabilities are technically limited for now (it's annoying, I need a powerful computer) and I use a truncated version with fewer observations, but with a deeper analysis... while the point rate is calibrated in specific centers selected by priorities, but the rate does not hit a specific spin (either earlier, or later, or in the wrong priority)... adaptive skillfully manipulates priorities and my goal is to determine by what reference point...

If I had the GRAIL....



it's simple))))

let's say there is a super strategy that gives x2 ALWAYS and EVERYWHERE....



I would register at 100 casinos

For 1-2 months I occasionally lost/won $10-100

then I would rank the casinos according to their solvency rating

and then according to the schedule I would f#ck on the flow with an increase



1. deposit 100 withdrawal 200 (I leave $50, 150 to the next casino for the deposit)

2. deposit 150 withdrawal 300 (I leave $100, 200 to the next casino for deposit)

3. deposit 200 withdrawal 400 (I leave $150, 250 to the next casino for deposit)

4. deposit 250 withdrawal 500 (I leave 200$, 300 to the next casino for deposit)

etc.

by the time some casino clamps down on withdrawals, a decent amount will have already been accumulated

and you can cross the "bankrupt" one off the list and repeat everything from the beginning....

until the list is shortened or the wave of increase passes to the end )))) but there will be crazy amounts on the table limits

////////////////

dreams, dreams.....

Discussion started by Shpilevoy , on November 22 02:50
Answers

Offer
Show all
FoxDuhovny, 23.11.2017 11:20
FoxSpiritual
The casino tolerates! There is a clear definition in business - acceptable losses! It must be said that in a casino it is not calculated from deposits but from the volume of bets. Therefore, according to most rules, in order to withdraw (win) say 1000 credits, you need to place bets on a volume of more than 3K, then the casino will tolerate your modest earnings...
InquisitorEA, 11/23/2017 11:13
InquisitorEA
Don't kill the chicken that feeds you. Through practice, figure out what withdrawal the casino tolerates per week/month and go for your share every week/month. There are many different casinos. Don't stifle your favorites too much, distribute a little bit to each.
vlados, 22.11.2017 23:16
vlados
they are already "lucky" with you, and if the Grail were there, it would be completely kaput;-(...it's good that most players don't come from the word schpielen (to play - German), like you, but from spazierengehen (to walk)!

Shpilevoy, 14.02.2014 08:15
Shpilevoy
I went my own way
spent time and money on experiments
but now, despite all the horror (all the other players are flying)
I pull with pneumatic +300 +500 every 15-20 minutes

I haven't become a millionaire yet
but over the night the steering wheel gained a total of +4.5 thousand UAH.
each entry in two stages 100+250 UAH.
we set it according to an interesting system 0-2-4-8-16 (I'll write more details on my site) + str[+/-5]
It is best to withdraw as soon as the loan breaks through x2 from the initial 350

moved into the room with the old pneumatic roulette
total -1200 (three separate sessions) maximums were: +60 and zero, +150 and zero, +500 and zero.
I wonder why it works unstable on the old ones

////////////

We are waiting for the promised description of the Rvu i Mechu system!

It is very useful to not lose the smart thoughts that come to mind while playing (especially at multi-tables).

Start of discussion ADM13 , on 21 February 09:30
Answers

Offer
Show all
Coin_8, 20.05.2015 05:18
Coin_8
You have a clear trick - "leave the table" after a significant rise in credit. This is an interesting move. Many players know how playing roulette swings credit up and down. A break after a rise gives a cut-off of the negative phase + moving to the end of the adaptive queue + clearing the memory of current templates.

The main problem is to synchronize so that the entry point is on a new growing wave. Here 2-3 spins become indicative. If yes, then yes.

Therefore, you do not need large deposits, because the whole game is on the edge - either a rocket, or a complete torbilovo. But with a small deposit it does not hurt.
Shpilevoy, 07.04.2015 11:27
Shpilevoy
I'll go and look through the statistics of different machines
maybe I'll dig something up
Shpilevoy, 07.04.2015 11:25
Shpilevoy
collisions are rare and common
///////////////
we don't have time to wait for those that appear once a year
means attention to frequent

I propose to consider them as working collisions
coner replays and sixline replays

as Admin correctly noted, I have many more sixlines on the Geometr field than is commonly believed
so 19-20-22-23-25-26 is also one of the sixes lying sideways on the field)))

coners are a rarer collision in meaning than sixes
so first we need an analysis of sixline repetitions

When do they come? At what distances?
what are they like?
How many WWW in a row is optimal to catch?
how often does the game return to these numbers? if the frequent sixline is considered a hot base point of spin trajectories, then the game (adaptive, distortions......) should support this area for some of its own reasons...........

"must" is a mistake ))) Coin doesn't like it when someone says "roulette should......" )))
Shpilevoy, 07.04.2015 11:18
Shpilevoy
What's good about roulette?
chaos - absence of normality
chaos breeds collisions
collisions can be short and long
the sooner we solve a long collision and squeeze it out to the fullest
the more money we earn
Shpilevoy, 22.08.2014 03:25
Shpilevoy
yes, this is how KhodKon was born

Theory of building systems for playing Queenstar roulette

Theoreticians, lovers of arguing in a foggy perspective, should be stopped immediately and irrevocably. Those who want to calculate something according to the classical scheme of probable outcomes. A kind of average calculation for a million spins and more. First of all, because the nature of the game is not tied to such long segments and other laws apply to it.

What is a million spins in a player's life? - To track a million throws of the ball at intervals of one minute, without a single break, we will need only less than two years!

The classic scheme of outcomes is not refuted by me, but practice is not like straight rails. The game is not a tram and if we do not take into account all the nuances, then we are simply doomed to become locked in our own mistakes and circle around a problem that is almost 300 years old.

The logical problem called "Roulette" is solved without any contradictions, and all that is required is to start from the very beginning, and not from the supposed "end" prescribed in higher mathematics textbooks, which states - "The Mathematical Expectation embedded in the payouts on the roulette is negative, which means the ending of the game will be negative!" - Actually, no one disputes this...

Without being like the "Apothecaries of the late 19th century", the more abstruse names for simple things, the smarter we seem, we will try to reduce the terminology to a minimum. - We will remove the formulas, and so that even a schoolchild can understand, I will explain with examples and comparisons!

Let's define: What is a "Systemic Game"?

This definition equally applies to a complex betting algorithm and a stupid rule to always bet on the birthdays of loved ones and relatives. For an outsider, there will be no difference, and this will be called a system game. We will explain the difference between systems later. At the moment, the order is important, as opposed to the chaotic numbers on the roulette wheel.

In order to understand what we are talking about, we will choose the simplest thing for consideration - a game with equal chances, let's assume "red" and only a bet on "red". We make it a rule not to change anything during the game, and we will call these actions a system.

In a long game on one chance a certain picture will begin to take shape. As the numbers fall on the roulette, depending on what is more, red numbers or black, we will gain pluses or go into minus. On a time scale, where we take each subsequent spin as a unit of roulettement.

A kind of oscillating wave appears. A line constructed relative to the applied system. Thus order against chaos gives birth to "dispersion"...

What is "DISPERSSION"?

A wonderful word. Actually, where does dispersion come from if we are dealing with chaos?

If you scatter peas on the floor, the peas will not be distributed evenly. There will be more peas in some places, and fewer in others. Draw a straight line across the floor and along this line, from its beginning to its end, the peas will appear in series and clusters. Now let's assume the same thing happens with pluses scattered across the time scale. There are more pluses in some places, and none at all in others. And this is the whole nature of chaos - "lack of uniform distribution in short periods of time" (a short period of a game session). And dispersion is an uneven distribution of a random result in a space limited by time. The shorter the time period, the greater the deviations.

The graph shows that when more chances are guessed, the curve creeps up, and the situation is played out when the guessed chances become smaller. The curve fluctuates, but there is no equalization. Which, of course, does not contradict the rule of "probable distributions", which states that the amount of "red" is eventually equally compensated by "black". Therefore, we have two rules...

The rule of "uneven distribution", which is forgotten by theoreticians, and the rule of "probable distributions", which is cited as an argument in the analysis of several thousand or more spins - where, remembering the MO (-2.7%), the curve of any graph rolls down...

The question naturally arises: which of the presented rules actually has the main impact on the game?

* * *

Let's use the saying of Archimedes: "Give me a support and a lever, and I will move the earth!"

The systems approach is the support, and the methods used in the systems are the lever!

By contrasting any "ordered" actions for guessing randomly falling numbers, we can build and track a stable picture of the game over a long period of time - "The behavior of chance against the system!"

With one clarification: To track the real picture of the game, and not the cumulative one, as in the scenario that theorists constantly chew over, where from the beginning of the game, we go to infinity. We will choose a time interval and will shift it with each spin and track the behavior of the case, in this interval (window). Our task is to react to what is happening in this "window of opportunity" and therefore influence the further result in infinity.

At this comparative stage, to clarify the hypothesis of a fairly simple method, as the proposed rate is only one chance. And no matter what argument against, now sounded, the existence of a systemic approach allows you to observe, draw conclusions and influence the result. We have chosen the "support" and in relation to it we will consider additional methods that need to be applied in the "window of opportunity" to gain the upper hand over the steadily declining MO! - Pauses; Budget; Increase in rates; Logical transitions ...

Why do we need to take Pauses?

For all systems without exception there are rules that are pointless to argue with.

Rule number one: We are dealing with chance, and therefore there are no, and never will be, flawless and absolutely win-win systems!

Rule two: Remembering the "Negative M.O." The longer the "continuous" game is played, the higher the risk of losing! This is where the similarity of the systems ends and the path from a simplified view to a more complex one begins. First of all, the "correct" system does not have the concept of "continuous"! To clarify, let's divide the game's dispersion into two components - "Short" and "Long Wave".



"Short wave" is a short series, when we manage to quickly guess the chance, when it is guessed on the first, second, third try...

To compensate for these fluctuations, short-term rate increases are used, but more on that later...

"Long wave" - in the long term, strives for an even distribution of "chances", but within one game session, everything is also subject to the first law and is most often distributed with different advantages, either "red" or "black". Unlike the short wave, its fluctuations are imperceptible. And it is its fluctuations that ultimately affect the player's pocket, if you are fighting for a win, then your task is to cope with it ...

When playing on equal chances, the boundary of the short wave is determined by four spins. Why? - This will also be discussed separately and in detail...

If the chance is not guessed in the specified interval, a pause is made, which restrains from a possible series of losing bets. Thus, during the game, negative fluctuations of the long wave are partially compensated.

In practice, the situation with the use of pauses looks far from ideal. You need methods by which you calculate some order, and follow this order with logical transitions. If you simply put one of the "chances" then pauses will only slow down the loss.

If we are talking about bets with an increase (in progression), on "equal chances", it is logical to limit yourself to four bets - having lost four bets, you take a break. These bets were not superfluous and it would be good if they did not exceed what has already been played. Here you are again in the game and the situation repeats itself. However, it may repeat, or maybe not! If it repeats itself immediately, then these are additional losses, to the losses that have not had time to compensate. If the "collapse" occurs after the "collapse", the game is already in the deep minus. Of course, with a systematic approach, for each system there is its own statistical probability of the occurrence of a series of such "Collapses"! But knowledge of their number will not help to calculate when exactly this probability will occur. Nothing is distributed evenly, and to predict in advance means to be a seer! Despite all of the above, the prescribed use of pauses is necessary, otherwise the mentioned minus will be even steeper! With System Pauses and Game Budget (global pauses) we are holding back the decline….

Budget strategy.

We restrain the fall - a system game is not only the calculation of bets and variations of where to place them, half of the success is given to the budget, or "Budget strategy". Remembering the long wave, which can turn sharply downwards, we get a series of "Collapses", as a result of an unsuccessful game day. It can be fatal, and the theoretical MO (-2.7%) will seem heavenly to you, because if you do not limit your budget, you will lose much more, and exceed the plan of promised theoretical losses.

Ten years later, I managed to learn more, achieve more, but I am ready to sign up for almost everything written in this article again. And to what was written, it should be added that since the appearance of the Paradox program, each of its users can easily display a graph of any real game and track the wave cycles in it and predict the start and stop of bets.

Tune in to a new attitude towards the game!

When someone starts talking about roulette systems, citing some simple betting plan as an example. Or talks about their art of fighting - like, they have a keen eye and see where the ball will fall. Or when a chorus of mathematicians "blows the mind" over and over again with the same monotonous theory, practically inapplicable in life (players do not behave like that), claiming on the basis of an incorrect model that there is no solution. Then doesn't it seem to you that all this is somehow too limited for a problem that is almost three hundred years old? Maybe there are other solutions?

Just make an assumption and step outside the equation - assume that all the necessary information is embedded in the game statistics. There is no "visual ballistics", "dealer's signature" and "ball memory", there are no "crooked wheels" and anyone who finds a pattern in these paths is actually mistaken and chasing a completely different phenomenon. And they are chasing it because it exists - elusive, always present. And it is this phenomenon that our program tracks. Without being distracted by the sectors of the roulette wheel, by how someone launches the ball somewhere, let's just learn to use this phenomenon, gaining an advantage...

Vitaly Queenstar

Start of discussion Loiri , on March 23 03:41
Answers

Offer
Show all
Maxim, 21.06.2017 17:20
Maxim
I've read a lot about the need for a Pause between game cycles. They say, otherwise you run into a Mat Waiting. And first there's the verbal mating, and then, actually, this waiting
But I play at the Goldfishka casino (Microgaming roulettes) and there is no such thing as a pause. You can log into your account even a year later, go to the roulette and the last number displayed will be the one that was the last a year ago. I have checked this a hundred times, because I keep statistics of the number dropped out for internal testing needs of my inadequate system. On the one hand, this is a blessing - it allows you to keep continuous statistics. But on the other hand ... it turns out that there are no pauses as such. And then what to do with your expectation? Funny moment ...
Avax, 18.06.2017 17:56
Avax
Alatissa 100%
Alatissa, 18.06.2017 15:38
Alatissa
I once had an impulse to test Vitaly's program (he is an interesting person), but I held back. I was stopped by the fact that it is necessary to collect a large array of statistics (preferably on live roulettes), while the players' bets are not taken into account, and it is they that influence the formation of this array.
Stepan, 05/14/2017 23:28
Stepan
The main mistake of the Paradox is that trends should be caught at the bottom and the entire growth accepted. In the Paradox, on the contrary, when the trend has already become a leader, they try to get something even further on it. Instead, there is a fall and a transition to a new trend that has come up. It turns out to be marking time.
Stepan, 05/14/2017 23:24
Stepan
Vitaly wrote well, but some statements can be argued with.

When developing a strategy, you must answer 2 questions?

1) How to win?

2) How not to lose?



In that exact order.

After answering question 1, you will receive the predictive part of the algorithm (the core).

By answering question 2, you will have a risk management system (RMS).



If your strategy does not have a core, it will never be able to bring you consistent winnings over the long term.

If your strategy does not have a risk control system, it may not bring you a stable win in the long run, even if the core provides a few percent of positive MO. Because unjustified risk can reduce this indicator to negative.

Discussion started by InquisitorEA , on 17 January 06:53
Answers

Offer
Show all
Shpilevoy, 02.05.2016 16:16
Shpilevoy
here are statistics from Profit (to test your theories faster)

6, 23, 26, 27, 11, 2, 30, 18, 2, 3, 33, 14, 11, 31, 6, 28, 26, 13, 27, 3, 10, 13, 30, 36, 21, 0, 28, 31, 0, 9
9, 9, 19, 0, 7, 28, 19, 28, 4, 15, 24, 30, 4, 36, 15, 20, 8, 22, 6, 14, 23, 36, 34, 16, 8, 18, 34, 3, 14, 1
35, 18, 29, 24, 29, 34, 14, 33, 18, 11, 33, 35, 30, 19, 31, 11, 36, 15, 35, 4, 0, 35, 14, 15, 1, 22, 28, 32, 0, 26
34, 27, 14, 34, 15, 33, 19, 24, 35, 24, 27, 28, 1, 6, 19, 23, 19, 3, 1, 23, 21, 13, 16, 28, 3, 10, 24, 9, 20, 13
10, 0, 14, 25, 9, 18, 35, 26, 21, 12, 31, 4, 27, 5, 30, 8, 4, 19, 36, 19, 18, 1, 27, 31, 0, 7, 20, 36, 8, 26
3, 32, 2, 18, 18, 17, 7, 34, 30, 20, 27, 28, 12, 7, 31, 18, 30, 28, 28, 10, 7, 32, 34, 3, 10, 11, 5, 3, 1, 34
32, 6, 32, 13, 23, 33, 30, 28, 3, 24, 2, 21, 10, 32, 25, 12, 12, 30, 24, 4, 19, 36, 30, 13, 12, 27, 33, 35, 6, 16
30, 33, 32, 23, 22, 19, 30, 32, 34, 23, 11, 30, 36, 6, 14, 19, 25, 31, 22, 6, 11, 30, 17, 6, 17, 10, 6, 22, 17, 17
23, 26, 29, 14, 21, 16, 23, 8, 25, 36, 5, 33, 8, 32, 26, 4, 24, 8, 3, 12, 24, 6, 34, 27, 11, 11, 19, 3, 12, 6
16, 8, 5, 20, 31, 15, 19, 35, 2, 31, 36, 8, 8, 23, 14, 0, 18, 16, 0, 6, 0, 1, 31, 5, 28, 2, 34, 32, 14, 27
1, 30, 14, 12, 19, 34, 32, 28, 24, 23, 25, 34, 24, 14, 19, 17, 33, 17, 24, 36, 15, 32, 31, 28, 31, 14, 5, 19, 20, 35
22, 5, 34, 30, 19, 32, 13, 15, 25, 35, 18, 4, 34, 29, 34, 21, 20, 8, 6, 29, 6, 11, 19, 34, 2, 12, 33, 18, 25, 14
23, 35, 31, 2, 23, 11, 8, 28, 24, 34, 23, 0, 9, 2, 3, 2, 7, 34, 5, 12, 12, 33, 15, 32, 7, 26, 6, 21, 32, 22
12, 5, 12, 9, 6, 4, 35, 7, 30, 23, 0, 21, 3, 21, 30, 13, 17, 36, 10, 30, 13, 5, 23, 14, 11, 3, 26, 34, 30, 2
28, 9, 12, 6, 19, 18, 32, 22, 33, 23, 10, 1, 9, 29, 30, 28, 31, 10, 35, 4, 36, 2, 20, 3, 23, 14, 18, 17, 5, 7
11, 8, 14, 16, 22, 12, 36, 34, 19, 15, 3, 2, 19, 30, 6, 35, 7, 25, 5, 30, 17, 3, 8, 17, 2, 13, 34, 9, 34, 20
22, 0, 27, 28, 16, 12, 2, 2, 21, 5, 29, 23, 7, 32, 18, 25, 31, 15, 32, 6, 27, 27, 27, 2, 31, 22, 24, 5, 14, 32
18, 13, 10, 13, 8, 2, 22, 21, 9, 18, 15, 9, 7, 6, 7, 22, 27, 16, 21, 26, 11, 31, 17, 12, 26, 1, 23, 8, 11, 1
33, 21, 14, 8, 28, 25, 28, 15, 5, 4, 3, 24, 24, 34, 7, 8, 35, 26, 21, 7, 28, 1, 12, 29, 35, 7, 27, 4, 32, 32
15, 1, 5, 27, 24, 36, 11, 33, 33, 24, 27, 11, 30, 19, 24, 32, 8, 5, 0, 22, 21, 6, 10, 6, 12, 14, 28, 1, 5, 36
6, 36, 20, 7, 35, 13, 2, 32, 0, 27, 2, 36, 27, 18, 24, 8, 34, 29, 35, 18, 28, 15, 8, 3, 14, 34, 19, 23, 14, 29
30, 25, 21, 10, 14, 17, 17, 35, 24, 24, 36, 22, 28, 1, 18, 3, 0, 18, 29, 13, 35, 10, 26, 26, 32, 16, 34, 10, 2, 28
33, 16, 20, 4, 19, 18, 3, 13, 32, 17, 19, 36, 13, 19, 36, 18, 36, 32, 29, 24, 17, 9, 28, 35, 25, 5, 30, 16, 16, 23
26, 31, 33, 31, 9, 24, 1, 10, 23, 11, 5, 24, 17, 26, 26, 16, 16, 4, 3, 16, 18, 20, 15, 13, 36, 27, 28, 15, 7, 27
5, 17, 15, 9, 0, 12, 15, 29, 14, 27, 27, 35, 36, 22, 5, 36, 2, 0, 0, 28, 15, 12, 7, 33, 25, 12, 10, 34, 1, 17
3, 2, 18, 8, 0, 8, 31, 34, 21, 0, 2, 11, 31, 33, 23, 26, 19, 7, 24, 3, 31, 19, 7, 36, 10, 26, 27, 3, 10, 30
30, 11, 16, 25, 8, 24, 0, 23, 35, 28, 16, 32, 11, 30, 12, 26, 28, 23, 20, 15, 13, 27, 24, 15, 20, 19, 32, 15, 6, 21
6, 20, 19, 11, 3, 2, 33, 29, 8, 5, 2, 10, 8, 19, 20, 1, 33, 8, 35, 9, 2, 1, 20, 8, 7, 9, 4, 36, 9, 26
12, 4, 19, 14, 28, 28, 0, 15, 14, 6, 33, 3, 24, 26, 29, 22, 7, 19, 17, 21, 4, 6, 2, 18, 23, 34, 30, 8, 5, 24
20, 36, 36, 19, 32, 13, 17, 7, 1, 0, 28, 14, 27, 1, 13, 25, 5, 22, 32, 6, 9, 9, 12, 2, 9, 34, 35, 12, 27, 9
10, 2, 25, 4, 25, 19, 7, 2, 30, 25, 1, 11, 17, 8, 27, 20, 12, 30, 25, 26, 0, 25, 8, 11, 9, 17, 18, 1, 20, 1
4, 35, 36, 0, 16, 36, 36, 35, 14, 30, 18, 2, 3, 19, 7, 33, 2, 5, 29, 26, 4, 25, 36, 23, 30, 1, 9, 20, 22, 26
15, 1, 2, 11, 26, 23, 30, 7, 6, 18, 35, 17, 25, 6, 34, 8, 29, 30, 28, 23, 0, 1, 17, 29, 33, 25, 14, 19, 12, 2
2, 19, 31, 34, 13, 33, 21, 35, 32, 11, 11, 24, 32, 2, 19, 32, 26, 3, 1, 10, 30, 21, 2, 5, 29, 35, 28, 12, 22, 4
25, 4, 19, 31, 28, 3, 19, 23, 24, 6, 18, 21, 15, 35, 0, 17, 5, 11, 10, 32, 11, 13, 17, 7, 0, 24, 19, 18, 32, 26
17, 22, 1, 24, 26, 23, 24, 6, 36, 6, 12, 26, 1, 8, 20, 29, 29, 21, 32, 10, 27, 29, 30, 7, 23, 9, 31, 25, 4, 29
Valery, 01/18/2015 03:37
Valery
Here I was watching at 6 am, maybe someone will be interested: player vanderluke, Live roulette with a dealer 25,21,2,17,20,26 when I went in these numbers were hanging on the board, then 8 (1620$), 25,9 (360$), 7 (900), 32,11 (1620), 35 (1080), 15 (1500), 14 (1320), 4,32 (900), 6,21 (1320), 20 (1680) dealer change, 19 (2040), 28,3 (1800), 5,28,30 (1440), 28,4,4,3,35,3 - he did not play anymore. In brackets, next to the number are the winning amounts. IF THIS POST CLOGS UP THIS TOPIC , PUT IT IN ANOTHER ONE, SOMEONE MAY HAVE AN EPIC EVENT WHEN ANALYZING THE SITUATION!
Valery, 01/17/2015 05:52 PM
Valery
I WANT THIS TOO!!!!! WHAT IS THIS GRAIL, SPRYT 5, LUCK LIKE IN A SLOT MACHINE? I MYSELF, THERE, WITH A DUMB MARTIN AND THE END OF A SERIES OF DOZEN PER DAY FROM 2700 TO 21000 AND IN A WEEK FROM 1000 TO 24000 WON, BUT MY CASE IS JUST A CASE! (EXCUSE THE PUN). In the steering wheel, as in any program, there are many weak points ... More than a month for several hours, every day I played on a dozen that did not fall out, but always, after winning, I turned off the steering wheel, and immediately started again. In 2 hours it consistently gave out $ 200. So I did not play until the loss, the series began to lengthen, I stopped. In the demo I continued, the series are getting longer, but there It's not scary to put a candy wrapper...
ADM13, 17.01.2015 17:07
ADM13
The reasons for which the authors came up with this rating is a mystery, but the order of numbers is close to the real one.

The rating included winners of roulette in hundreds of different online casinos from Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia, Moldova, Uzbekistan, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia. As you can see, the winner was a player from Ukraine – Alexey with a win of more than 330 thousand Euros on French Roulette. Congratulations from the bottom of our hearts!

Winner Game Win Date Casino Online
Ukraine Aleksiy French Roulette €330,047.00 18 Sep 2013 Casino Tropez
Russia Leonid French Roulette $153,771.00 15 Aug 2012 Casino Tropez
Russia Sergey P. European Roulette $108,500.00 23 Feb 2013 William Hill
Russia andrey Roulette Live $101,473.00 May 8, 2013 Casino Tropez
Russia Sergey Premium European Roulette $96,100.00 May 18, 2012 Casino Tropez
Ukraine Aleksiy French Roulette €69,808.00 23 Aug 2013 Casino Tropez
Russia Sergey P. Roulette Pro $91,000.00 18 Sep 2013 21Nova Casino
Ukraine Aleksiy French Roulette €67,865.00 13 Sep 2013 Casino Tropez
Russia Sergey P. European Roulette $86,400.00 21 Feb 2013 William Hill
Russia Vyacheslav European Roulette $62,420.00 Nov 9, 2012 Casino Tropez
Russia Yury French Roulette $81,837.00 Oct 21, 2012 Casino Tropez
Russia Sergej Roulette Pro $80,723.00 Jan 31, 2013 Casino Tropez
Russia Leonid French Roulette $75,150.00 May 13, 2013 Casino Tropez
Russia Oleg 3D Roulette $74,657.00 May 4, 2012 Casino Tropez
Russia Ilya L European Roulette Gold €53,840.00 May 27, 2013 Ladbrokes Casino

You can also notice that high rollers at roulette like Playtech casinos and such roulette varieties as French, European and Live. Among the top 15 winners are mostly Russians and one Ukrainian. In general, draw your own conclusions, gentlemen, and play wisely!

InquisitorEA, 01/17/2015 16:02
InquisitorEA
90k is not a small thing for them. If they are from the top three, then they are more likely professional players.
Valery, 01/17/2015 15:46
Valery
Firstly: what's the point, they don't come every night, only a few see them, and I wouldn't run to play like that? And secondly, this is one of the top three casinos, it's unlikely that this show-off will somehow affect their multi-billion dollar turnover and the same profits!
InquisitorEA, 01/17/2015 15:30
InquisitorEA
Maybe these are fake administrator accounts?
Valery, 01/17/2015 13:56
Valery
By the way, at night there are always several players (their nicknames are visually memorable), they quickly make money in a few spins, some up to 10,000, some more, and then they all stop playing with lightning speed! No matter how much I watched, I don’t understand how: the game is going the most average way, no series, no repetitions, no other distortions, not the largest number of players at the table!!! HOW!!!
Valery, 01/17/2015 13:47
Valery
I saw it in Live: a regular game, no visible distortions, winnings from 50 cents to several tens of dollars, a limit of 2400 and not in everything, suddenly one player started getting winnings: several for $19,280, several for 9 thousand and something, several even less! In this roulette you can't see the players' bets, you can't see who lost and how much, only who won and how much, on the screen the player won about $90,000! Adaptive shouldn't have given him a single chance and killed him first!
Avax, 17.01.2015 07:16
Avax
The first answer is that it has to be a rational kernel. Something that will give you a foundation in the game.

For example, Shpilevoy has a good strategy for multiplayer tables.
1. Play only when many players have gathered.
2. Adaptive lands players in some sequence. When there are many players, it is difficult to combine them, so the casino kills one after another. While the casino is drowning someone, the rest have time to develop.
3. The stakes must be average and below the level compared to other players, then we are at the end of the queue for elimination.
4. The arrangement scheme can be any, the main thing is that it is
a) non-standard
b) concentrated
In fact, this allows narrow areas to be placed in places other than where everyone else is. And by some miraculous adaptive coincidence, these areas fall more often than they should.
5. In case of a noticeable increase in credit, completely exit the game and enter in about 15 minutes. Adaptive does not like to leave the current player he is working on until zero, and therefore there is time to pinch off the next piece of profit.

Thanks to these simple rules, Shpilevoy quite successfully scalps such giants as BetFair and Titan Casino.

Valery wrote:

WHAT DO YOU RECOMMEND FOR USING THE TEMPLATES 17-20, 16-19, 28-29, ZERO-SPILE +35 IN THE GAME, AND MAYBE OTHERS THAT I DON'T NOTICE?

I addressed this issue in my book. I will briefly outline the meaning.

1) Remember the first time you approached the roulette table. Your mind was clear - NOT A SINGLE TEMPLATE. How did you play? Nothing. You just poked chips or focused on the actions of other players at the table.

Many of you probably didn't have a second chance because live casinos were closed... But still.

Gradually you expanded your perception. For some of your actions (which could be based on the most bizarre fantasies and readings) you received winnings, for others - losses.

So gradually, step by step, certain patterns crystallized in the head. Like Pavlov's dog, on conditioned-constant reflexes moistened with fat doses of adrenaline.

2) Are there any templates in principle? Both YES and NO at the same time.

"NO" for LONG PERIOD RNG

If you are a robot and simply record the spins of a specific or different roulettes, then to your surprise you will find that the 0-36 combination exists just like 0-18. It is only a question within the framework of the period captured for analysis.

There is no roulette that will throw 0-36 twice as often as any other combination.

"YES" for SHORT PERIOD and ADAPTIVE

One of the miners asked me a rhetorical question - "I've been playing at XXX casino for over a year. After zero comes up, I bet anything except 1 and 36, because it's too easy. But in the end, I calculated that out of 50 zero outputs, 1 and 36 come up >30% of the time." Yes, this is a pattern, but it was born by ADAPTIVITY. After the miner began to consistently insure 1 and 36 with a couple of chips, this collision fell apart and he calmed down

Next, a SHORT PERIOD. There are days and even weeks of active play = period frames, within which many numbers are asleep. That is, they enter the game very rarely and unexpectedly. You will not build a plus if you catch these sleeping numbers. But if you have a very strong attachment to them in your head, then this will cost you very dearly.

From the scalpel (sharpening the game for literally a couple of numbers) we will move on to broader things.

Series and neighbors. Yes, you cast your nets wide. Yes, you won't have 500 spins with only 2 hits. But that doesn't make it any easier. Roulette is a balanced game. Bet wider = guess more often = get less.

This "you guess more often" really supports your Pavlov's dog. You wait-wait-wait - and get it! In fact, you only worsen your vision of the game.

Think about it! During the game, a third of the field does not exist for you, because it falls outside your stereotyped thinking. After, for example, 12-21-33-5-26, you will not even think of betting on ten numbers. They WILL COMPLETELY SKIP from your perception of the field, and accordingly will not be included in the forecast and in the next bet.

The behavior lines developed in this way are an open book for the adaptive. The casino will play with you like a cat with a mouse.

Conclusion. With templates you will never get a clear vision of the game and clear predictions. This does not mean that you will not win! You will. But only when the course of the game is formed according to your templates. All other sessions (and there will be more) will be losing.
Start of discussion Coin_8 , on 07 May 09:20
Answers

Offer
Show all
ADM13, 08.05.2015 10:12
ADM13
You didn't anger anyone, that's Coin's way of putting it. With salt and pepper

* * *
There's a fine line here. It's one thing when you're in the game and making predictions based on what's on the board. It's a completely different thing when you go deep inside yourself and make predictions based on what happened somewhere, sometime.

* * *
Truth is born in debate, so everything is OK.
Valery, 07.05.2015 22:48
Valery
WELL 20 WILL NOT BE SLASHED NOW, BUT JUST SLASHED SOON! But it’s not for me to argue with you, I just want to understand a little more than I understand now, forgive me if I made you a little angry!
Valery, 07.05.2015 22:35
Valery
IN THE CURRENT GAME THERE WAS 17, AND THE TEMPLATE LOOKS EXACTLY AT THIS. Let's just go to veni,vidi for these three examples and see what the results will be?
Coin_8, 07.05.2015 22:33
Coin_8
"which is drawn on the board during the current session."

17 came up, there are no prerequisites, but the person kills everything connected with 20. Why? Because he has an idea IN HIS HEAD that THIS should (= I want) to work. After all, it worked 3 months ago... and last year too... and Vasya said that it worked for him too... and even a dick of such length.
Well, 20 will definitely hit now!!!
Valery, 07.05.2015 22:24
Valery
it's like two sides of the same coin: if you look at it or bet, but guess wrong - it's a collision! If you bet and hit, then it's a pattern! After all, a pattern is born in the head based on a pattern or unusualness that is drawn on the board during the current session.
Coin_8, 07.05.2015 22:20
Coin_8
1) If it is on the scoreboard:

2 - 6 - 8 - 10
this is a collision of the heated 1st dozen

28 - 12 - 29 - 29
this is a collision of heated neighbors 7

2) If for some reason we want to put 8, but put 2-6-8-10, this is a pattern, and a mysterious one at that

Template: Rolled 17 always kill 20 - this is a template. Why 20? Why not repeat on the track next to 17?

The template does not look at the CURRENT GAME.
Coin_8, 07.05.2015 22:14
Coin_8
A collision is a pattern or an unusual occurrence that is drawn on the board during the current session. No historical memory or personal priorities.

A template is born in the head and is projected as a JUSTIFIED DESIRE in the form of a bet forecast.
Valery, 07.05.2015 21:55
Valery
HOW TO DISTINCTION THEM? 2.6.8.10- IS THIS A COLLISION OR A PATTERN? 28,12,29.29 -WHAT IS THIS?
Coin_8, 07.05.2015 21:41
Coin_8
P.S. Important! Please do not confuse the concepts of "TEMPLATE" with the concept of "COLLISION". These are two different things.