Adaptive and anti-scheme casino generations

Comrades, please clarify.
What kind of roulette do the players on this forum prefer?
Which one, live or single with adaptive?
I'm still just learning.
I wanted to ask if it makes sense to learn single-player and how it performs over the long haul.

I tried playing Profit single-player using Boris's strategies.
At first, the budget increases, say, to 2x, but then the adaptive freeze occurs, and no matter what strategy I try, there's no return. Either I go back to my own or I lose.
Even if I quit the game at x2 and then decide to play again after a while, I can't get back into the black. It's as if Adaptiv knows I owe him money.
The game also resembles slots; I still can't figure out whether the numbers and statistics are worth looking at. The number of chips on the table decides whether the adaptive chip will either stack the deck or gobble it up.

In live it’s already different, I started to study a little and see what trends are.
Here you can already see how the adaptive system is cheating not only you but other players as well. When you see streaks of black/red, or an endless train of odd numbers, and the guy in the chat is furious that even numbers aren't coming up, it's a roulette scam.

Single (drawn) roulettes play INDIVIDUALLY with you.
On the one hand, this is good because other players' bets do not interfere with the adaptor's decisions on where to place the ball.
But on the other hand, such decisions are made based solely on your balance and history. Most roulette wheels are actually slot machines, and they even have stock market math. This means the developer won't let you stay in the black for long.
Therefore, only two types of drawn roulettes are suitable for playing:
a) Roulettes with fairness control - ideal, where the spins are decided by the casino before your bets
b) roulettes with general stock mathematics for all players - popular, from world manufacturers

Multistols (live roulette) are played with multiple players at once.
In Evolution, for example, there are 2,000+ players at a single table. Everyone's bet sizes are different, and the adaptive system can't kill everyone at once. These roulettes operate in waves of winning and losing money. The key is to avoid synchronizing your strategies with the majority or super-high rollers, who are currently being killed by the adaptive system.

We're surrounded by scams (except for CC), whether it's roulette or slots, where you have to navigate through adaptive logic.

I know for sure that at least 2-3 casinos on earth had such balls === you can hear them by the sound when they come off and go into the pockets of the wheel.

vikiz wrote:

In reality, it makes no difference what you bet on, no matter how you look at it, the mathematical odds are all the same

This is the opinion of suckers = mathematicians and poker players who went broke on the wheel )))
There is a difference. The real chances are not equal.
Players' bets form the statistics board.
In a casino, it's a game for money, not with a random number generator (RNG))))

Evolution is screwing people so much that today the ball hit 4 in the auto roulette, but they didn't even count it; the game just continued as if it never happened. And a lot of people in the chat were betting on 4.

Why you will never win at blackjack casino =

100pravda.com/forum/replica/657-bazovaya...aet-schet-kart#74487

People who don't believe in adaptive technology are so naive....
...or pretend to be naive in the case of casino affiliates