Adaptive and anti-scheme casino generations

Shpilevoy writes:

Probability of repeating a sixline 6/37 = 16.21%

Probability of getting a sixline 6/37
But when such a concept as repetitions is used, it is necessary to clarify on which spin: immediately, on the second, on the third...
For example, a sixline fell out.
The probability that it will happen again immediately
p= 6/37 = 0.162...
The probability that the next spin will be a miss, and then it will be repeat
p= 31/37 * 6/37 = 0.136..
The probability that there will be a miss, a miss, a repeat
p= 31/37 *31/37 *6/37= 0.114..

In Russian, this means that W will be on average 1 time out of 6 attempts to continue.
Let's say W (this six has already played 3 times) = next W is another 16.21%, 1 time out of 6 continuations....
etc.

and here I don't understand at all what you've twisted

If you set a goal to catch exactly this event without an entry marker (every time) and you start playing === it can be anywhere in the 10,000 spins segment === both at the very beginning and at the end.

or it may not be there at all.

And why are there any theoretical formulas in the "Adaptive" topic?
the probabilities are for truly random events.

Alatissa wrote:
Here's a player, for example, who sees 15-15-15 and thinks, let me just load #15 and catch a miracle. And what? The system accepts the bet, a recalculation occurs, and 15 may no longer be a weak number. And some other one is thrown out.
It turns out 15-15-15-n. The player rebets or increases the bet, 15 is also not weak, and another one appears on the screen.
15-15-15-nn
Let go of the stakes, and here it is 15-15-15-nn-15.

This is how 99.9% of all casino roulettes work.

LUCKY-13 wrote:

Alatissa wrote:
Here's a player, for example, who sees 15-15-15 and thinks, let me just load #15 and catch a miracle. And what? The system accepts the bet, a recalculation occurs, and 15 may no longer be a weak number. And some other one is thrown out.
It turns out 15-15-15-n. The player rebets or increases the bet, 15 is also not weak, and another one appears on the screen.
15-15-15-nn
Let go of the stakes, and here it is 15-15-15-nn-15.

This is how 99.9% of all casino roulettes work.

In this situation, the entry point is already after 15 15, and not after 15 15 15, since 3 numbers in a row on the board is already quite hot and can already cool down, well, and then as the curve will lead, it can fall 4 times and 5, but here the question is at what rate the system at the moment "allows" you to give it? One thing is 10$ dollars per number, another is 100$ and more, although multi-table and all that...
And if manipulations and teasing like 15-15-15-nn-15 begin, then it’s better to let go of this situation and look at something else.

Honey, can you even imagine how many of these hares (a hare is 15-15, 10-10... two identical numbers in a row) you can see in the generation before you get to 15-15-15?

15-15-15 you can catch it and even post a screenshot on the forum, and everyone will gasp),
but no one will know how much money was lost before.

Alatissa wrote: Honey, can you even imagine how many of these hares (a hare is 15-15, 10-10....two identical numbers in a row) you can see in the generation before you get to 15-15-15?

15-15-15 you can catch it and even post a screenshot on the forum, and everyone will gasp),
but no one will know how much money was lost before.

Hunter in the time of Tsar Pea came up with the term "rabbits" for ABA = like a head with ears, but that's not the point...

I use a proven method - strictly give the adaptive a game scenario, in which the analytics always registers the Randomness of the hit. And if I see that the adaptive draws a generation with a check, i.e. as if it doubts the current Win or a series of recent wins, then immediately stop and take a break.