Adaptive and anti-scheme casino generations

Cosmic wrote:

Shpilevoy wrote: my friend Dmitry believes that several games with a small EVEN bet on odds and dozens for 30-50 spins will provoke packs of "wonderful" scoreboards with heaps of sharp collisions...
= in this video I combine catching "EXTENDED COLLISIONS" with the elimination method in the form of simple rebet COMBINES

here you sit for hours racking your brains over what will fall, and a person comes in and makes 2 grand in 35 minutes, although I don’t have a couple of times 200 greenbacks to conduct such experiments

And don't rack your brains too much, but study everything step by step and play AT YOUR betting scale.
I watched the video and modestly experimented on air:

Shpilevoy wrote: my friend Dmitry believes that several games with a small EVEN bet on odds and dozens for 30-50 spins will provoke packs of "wonderful" scoreboards with heaps of sharp collisions...
= in this video I combine catching "EXTENDED COLLISIONS" with the elimination method in the form of simple rebet COMBINES

here you sit for hours racking your brains over what will fall, and a person comes in and makes 2 grand in 35 minutes, although I don’t have a couple of times 200 greenbacks to conduct such experiments

my friend Dmitry believes that several games with a small EVEN bet on odds and dozens for 30-50 spins will provoke packs of "wonderful" scoreboards with heaps of sharp collisions...
= in this video I combine catching "EXTENDED COLLISIONS" with the elimination method in the form of simple rebet COMBINES

Adaptive can also do incredible money distributions:



15-15-15-15-15-15

This is a rare situation "for the really stupid", when the platform is saturated with players' money. Some of the extra money is openly given away to people.

... from three to five plus repetitions is not uncommon for an adaptive, but try to show at least three repetitions of a number when betting on the maximum head-on with a split (splits)...
for example, a bet in Profit where the number is 10 credits plus a minimum of two splits...
And so for such a bet to work on the first hit,
then there is an increase - in the street to the maximum in the second hit
and then increase - bet in track sector + neighbors in the third hit...
anywhere in a row of five repetitions...

Well-l-l-l-l betting on Luck is pointless. There must be a reason (marker) for entry.
Let's say AB is rolled, where A and B are in the same cone.
Let's go in.
Coner $5, A and B $5, all other six numbers $1. Then, with W, we will geometrically bomb this same six.
The probability of repeating a sixline is 6/37 = 16.21%.
In Russian, this means that W will be on average 1 time out of 6 attempts to continue.
Let's say W (this six has already played 3 times) = next W is another 16.21%, 1 time out of 6 continuations....
etc.
The probability that any sixline will accelerate to 5 spins in a row =
(6/37)^5 = 0.000111
i.e. according to mathematics, of course you can wait for 10,000 spins in the segment

If you set a goal to catch exactly this event without an entry marker (every time) and you start playing === it can be anywhere on the 10,000 spins segment === both at the very beginning and at the end.

///////////////////
With the number everything is exactly 6 times worse ))))) and the probability of waiting for 6 in a row! the number drops is beyond fantasy === the work of the adaptive....

///////////////////////////////
I am not a supporter of catching too rare events = it is unprofitable and takes a long time.... it is much better to act on simple and quick provocations and collisions ))) at worst you need to catch "smeared/diluted to 2L" rare events = reduce the probability segment many times...

I'll whip up a video of a simple new combine harvester "Reinforced Concrete Sixline" and post it in my diary

100pravda.com/forum/roulette-game/695-sb...vogo?start=165#54397