Favorite number on casino roulette

In 36 spins, on average, only 24 numbers are drawn (i.e. 2/3). So, a maximum of 12 numbers are repeated, "played" more than once. Moreover, it is unlikely that each of the 12 numbers is repeated. It is much more logical to expect that some numbers are repeated two or more times.

And if you know which numbers come up more often, then winning is simply inevitable. One of the popular systems is built on this principle, the essence of which is as follows. For some time, the player does not place bets, observing which bets win. As soon as he notices a repeating number, he immediately bets on it. And so on 36 times. If in 36 spins the repeating number comes up again, the player will be in the black (in the worst case, he will stay the same on the 36th spin), if not, he will lose 36 chips. The possible win is less than the possible loss - with each new spin, the net profit decreases (if the desired number came up on the 35th step, then the profit is only one chip; if on the 34th - then two, etc.), while the loss in case of a loss is unchanged.

In addition, the very assumption that the number that has already appeared twice will win is no better than the assumption that any random number will win. You can bet on 35 or 12 with the same success - the result will not change. The probability of a random number appearing in a series of 36 spins is almost 63%, regardless of whether it is repeated or not.

In our country this system is known as Biarritz (although in the classic Biarritz system the recommendation for choosing a number is exactly the opposite - you need to choose the number that comes up the least often).

The list of roulette systems can go on and on, but the essence will not change. When playing a system with positive progression, you usually lose, but little by little, hoping to hit the jackpot sooner or later. When playing a system with negative progression, you usually win little by little, but risk losing everything if you get into an unlucky streak. In the long term, the effectiveness of almost all systems (except for the unlimited Martingale) rests on the notorious two percent, which is the casino's share. You can lose money faster, you can lose slower, but if you want to play roulette with a positive mathematical expectation, then you need to organize your own casino. There are no other options. More precisely, almost none.

Surely, numerous authors of new and super-reliable roulette systems feel quite well financially. Judging by the reviews of ungrateful buyers, the market mostly sells slightly combed versions of Martingale, which, as we found out above, is more dangerous than useful for the player. The activities of such experts are generally not much different from fraud, but there are few formal reasons for nitpicking - as a rule, more or less sane authors of systems "honestly" warn buyers that their system does not always work and much depends on luck (however, there are also such unique individuals who guarantee the player a positive mathematical expectation). The buyer, as a rule, cannot return the defective product to the seller, since the sellers prefer not to indicate their address. So the unlucky players are left to slander their former idols on Internet forums, hoping that this will cool the naive roulette lovers who are thirsty for a surefire recipe for easy money for $25 with delivery.

"Professional" roulette players - that is, people who make money playing the game using the right strategy - do not exist. But there are people who have managed to trick their luck.

"To hell with the fools who play by some system," he shouted as the croupier cleared all his bets from the table.
Jack London. "The Kid Dreams"

The characters in the story "The Kid Dreams" could not complain about bad luck. Smoke and the Kid created their "system", the success of which was based on the fact that the roulette wheel, dried out by the heat of the fireplace, behaved predictably. A similar story happened in reality: in 1873, the British engineer Joseph Jaggers won more than three hundred thousand dollars in the Monte Carlo casino.

It may seem that today, when technology has reached a completely different level, it is impossible to repeat such a success, but in the 90s of the last century, Jaggers' trick - with certain variations - was repeated. Spanish producer and amateur mathematician Gonzalo Garcia-Pelayo noticed that in a Madrid casino on some wheels the same numbers were repeated more often than others, and formed a family team that won more than 2 million dollars in two years. In 1992, Gonzalo was blacklisted, and he spent ten years trying to get an acquittal, since he did not and does not consider his actions to be fraud. The court made a final decision on the case only in June last year: from now on, Gonzalo can freely visit casinos. However, the player himself, apparently, sued on principle and does not intend to return to roulette. However, he plans to sue the casino for the winnings lost during the forced downtime (according to Gonzalo’s estimate, we are talking about 1.2 million euros).

But the ball's landing place is not only determined by the wheel. The initial impulse to the ball is given by the dealer's hand. Could it be that the dealer automatically throws the ball with approximately the same force, which allows one to guess at least the sector in which the ball will land? Roulette players have been asking this question for a long time, but there are still no statistics confirming or refuting this assumption. The difficulty, first of all, is that it is very difficult to collect data on a specific dealer. In addition, it is not a fact that a dealer aware of external observation will throw the ball in the same way as usual (gambling expert Frank Scoblete wittily compared this situation to quantum mechanics, in which the presence of an observer affects the result of observations; scoblete.casinocitytimes.com/articles/151.html).

Is it possible to estimate where the ball will land, knowing its speed and movement and the speed of the wheel? Of course it is, although it is unrealistic to quickly perform such calculations in your head. Therefore, you need to use a computer. The first specialized device capable of predicting with some accuracy where the ball will land was built in 1961 by Claude Shannon and Edward Thorp, who made their research public in 1966 ( www.c2000.cc.gatech.edu/classes/cs8113c_...g/readings/thorp.pdf ). In the 1970s, a group of graduate students at the University of Santa Cruz tried to organize a roulette team. The team members used portable computers to calculate where the ball would land, but despite the overall success of the game, the group soon broke up (for more details, see "KT" #540).

The financial outcome of the experiment was positive, but modest: after two years of developing the computer system, the "eudaemons" (as they called themselves) earned about 10 thousand dollars and went their separate ways. Last year, with the help of high-tech, three players from Eastern Europe cheated the London Ritz casino out of 1.3 million pounds sterling - and the court sided with them, since the devices used could not affect the movement of the ball.

We know that it is impossible to win at roulette using one of the successful strategies. The history of gambling knows several cases when players managed to beat the casino using, in general, illegal methods. But the amazing thing is that, as a rule, famous players, having achieved success at roulette, lost interest in the game and retired. Of course, in many cases they did this not without pressure from the casino, but Ed Thorpe, the "eudaemon" graduate students and even Gonzalo Garcia-Pelayo were not banned from entering gambling establishments.

The point is, apparently, that - as strange as it may sound - the main incentive for the most successful roulette players was not money. Or - not only and not always money. The main incentive was winning - in a situation where winning is impossible. And this victory is much more valuable than the sure two percent that the casino keeps for itself.

Start of discussion Avax, on January 13 03:54

Shpilevoy, 10/19/2016 21:28
Shpilevoy
they once wrote about hot sluices here
I liked the idea better

the point is that the backs are going
some numbers are accelerating
if an hour/day/month ago these were the same numbers that were remembered, now these will be different sets
it doesn't matter what they depend on, the main thing is to discard old patterns

next SOME drop down numbers
form repetitions of the type of steps by quantity
It is clear that the backs go and the groups flow
from 0 to 1, from 1 to 2, from 2 to 3, etc.

if we take a large enough sample
then there will be groups 5 times and 7 times and 10 times.....THIS IS 100% FACT
those that became 7 times once 100% were 0-1-2-3-4-5-6 .....also 100% FACT

which ones will become superstars in THIS SESSION and how quickly will they flow
we don't know and the pattern of transitions is quite varied
but we know for sure that there will be a pyramid that will move along the X axis in a wave
and if we take a reasonable depth of history,
then you can always catch the moment when 5-9 numbers have accumulated at the level (depending on the aggressiveness of the session and the size of the working shoulder), the moment one of them moves further BREAKTHROUGH
Shpilevoy, 10/19/2016 21:18
Shpilevoy
yes of course ))))
in profit the series of cc for 30 spins, therefore
a) the first part of the experiment does not make sense, the adaptor is shown 4 and 4 holes in turn
b) then there are bets with a progression of 4 and 4
here the calculation is that the adaptive will accelerate them and you won't have to wait until the current 4 come after 50-100 bypass (the credit won't be enough to wait)
c) when we bet 8 numbers at once with progression, this is the most dangerous part, but the probability of hitting is higher

1)
in short, we have a dry jerk, with drawdowns of 200-300 chips, the session profit is +100
2L in a row will destroy the positive result of ten sessions
i.e. for a long period you need to have an AVERAGE winning rate of 1/9, which in the context of a static progressive bet on 4( numbers seems unrealistic to me

2)
for the rgn stage
why wait for a bunch of spins at the beginning
we take the statistics and rewind, we select 4( numbers that fell 2 times
thus we intercept the pure repeatability of centers (without random additions) and expand the variability of Andrey's logic


Mira, 10/19/2016 2:53 PM
Mira
Again
Start 1000
4-16-21-26 (1012)
2-9-20-34 (964)
progression 1020
progression 1080
all 8 for 3$ in rooms 1116

Finish 1116
Total +116$

It would be nice to see the robot in action.
Mira, 10/19/2016 2:43 PM
Mira
Another run with a game restart and new sets

Casino Profit
Start 1000
14-17-19-36 and 22-28-8-3
+ + + + + + + + (19) + + + + (14)
+ + + + + + + + (28) + + + + + + + + + + + (
- - - - - - - - - - (14) min 852 Credit 1068
- - - - - - (22) Credit 1128
All eight, $3 start in numbers, 5 respins
- - (17) Credit 1188
Finish 1188
Total +188$

Played for fun.
The progression was $1 per number, every 2 spins it added another $1 to the bet numbers.
FoxDuhovny, 10/19/2016 2:22 PM
FoxSpiritual
Everything is correct, you got it right the first time. The second time, the adaptive prepared an answer, i.e. calculated the player, this is the adaptive answer. A natural analytical one. Now imagine a situation where the game script develops such answers for the purpose of collecting them and then resetting the game statistics...
Mira, 10/19/2016 2:15 PM
Mira
Andrey, how do you speak?

Casino Profit
Start 1000

1) Excl. 0-7-10-13-16
+ + + + + (16) + + + + + (16) Credit 976
2) Excl. 0-25-26-28-29
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + (29) + + + + + + + + + (28) Credit 1004
3) I bet 7-10-13-16 with progression
+ 1036
4) I put 25-26-28-29 with progression
+ 1068
It's a coincidence that it happens like this from the first move here and there.
5) I set 7-10-13-16 and 25-26-28-29 auto-repeat 5 times
- - - - - 1028
Credit 1028
FoxDuhovny, 10/19/2016 01:32
FoxSpiritual
Choose any 4 numbers on the roulette, Zero always remains empty (for example). Play in the following format: the bet covers the entire field in liquid except for the selected numbers and zero. Play the bet until one of the favorite numbers including zero comes up for the second time. again choose any 4 numbers except those you have already chosen and write down the first 4 already played, place a bet again until the number comes up for the second time. write down the last 4 numbers and again return to the first 4 favorites, make a liquid bet with doubling and play until the first fall, again go to the second 4 favorite numbers, make a liquid bet and double it, play until the first fall. after that, place a bet on all 8 numbers in the amount matching the last bet and play 5 spins in auto mode and see what happens ...
ADM13, 13.01.2014 17:55
ADM13
"(Gambling expert Frank Scoblete wittily compared this situation to quantum mechanics, in which the presence of an observer influences the outcome of observations;"

- Surprisingly, we have encountered this paradox many times in our work on pool algorithms.

Zero on roulette = regular number


Wow, to be honest, it was unexpected for me, for some reason I thought that it was precisely the lack of funds that made you find an alternative way to earn money in this way. For example, this is exactly why I became interested in roulette, specifically in the Profit casino, which I learned about from your videos, as well as about honesty control, for this a special thank you.
Boris, I want to share my experience, if I may say so, it sounds funny of course, but still.
I once asked you in the comments to your videos about tactics for everything except one.
I meant the roulette with increased payout in the Profit casino where the winning coefficient when betting exclusively on a number is 37:1
Even in the description of this roulette in the Profit casino this tactic is given as an example.
I tried to play, entered 4 dollars and bet as follows:

1. Created a series of 30 spins
2. I did about 18-25 idle spins and watched what came up, if at least two zeros came up I created a new series (I decided not to bet on zero because I considered this number to be the rarest, and if it throws out two zeros or more, it seemed to me that it could throw out 3 and 4 zeros in the same series, so I turned it off)
3. Then, when I thought I could bet, I bet in this range of spins on all numbers except zero 3.6 dollars and won my treasured 0.10 cents, after which I created a new series, total in a series at the rate)

So I made more than two dollars and one day for some reason I thought I was cool and once again decided not to wait, not to make empty spins and on the second spin I bet on everything except zero, and as you guessed, of course I lost.
I know Boris, you are probably laughing when you see the amounts I am writing about, but I will note that now I am a simple student and even 1 extra dollar will feed me very tasty. That is why I have placed such hopes on the honesty control at the Profit casino.
It seems to me that even by following this primitive tactic there is some chance for a layman like me to sometimes help myself with resources if necessary.
And I want to ask you, maybe you have some methods on how to catch zero in the Profit casino? For example, how to assume, watching the roulette, that it will throw in zero in the range of the next 5-10 spins or can it catch another number, etc.?
Best regards, Denis.



Hi Denis,

zero is the same number as any other, it just catches the eye when it appears on the scoreboard )))

the easiest solution when to wait 0
1) as a finals acceleration 0
2) how to overclock zero-spire
3) as part of collisions for the 0-1-36 link
4) if one 0 has already entered the scoreboard, there is a high probability that there will be another one nearby

accordingly, if these prerequisites are not present, then the appearance of 0 is expected with a standard probability of 1/37

Discussion started by Shpilevoy , on 22 November 02:54
Answers

Offer
Show all
vlados, 04.12.2017 20:52
vlados

I read... and... based on your... useful speeches I decided to create a new group for you to discuss, please don't be disdainful - take part... To the owner of the site - a humble request: promise - hand out sugar buns, because the local people are reluctant to participate in the debates - apparently, at the wheel, having gone crazy they sit, but do not want to share what they have learned - they hide, without SELF-INTEREST ;...
FoxDuhovny, 03.12.2017 22:34
FoxSpiritual
Vlados! We are talking about the ability of the matrix I built, processing statistics in a certain way, to get a projection of monitoring the adaptive work using the distribution of numbers by lists and bundles, recording trends and activities, I found landmarks. A landmark is a coincidence of one or more priorities (dominant features) and ratings (maximum values of belonging to lists). For example, five numbers 19,34,37,19 ... 22 ... the rating number was 34, it has max L, max F and min W in the fourth spin out of all 4 numbers, it seems to be an obvious priority, but number 22 fell out, the 19-22 bundle did not play in the second spin 4904 spins and suddenly fell on the zero landmark! on the 4905 spin, there are very specific reasons for such a coincidence, I studied them and recorded ... for comparison, the 19-34 bundle plays in the eighth! once, given that most of the connections are in the range from 4 to 6 for 5400 spins, everything above 6+ is a way out (adaptive work) and if it does not help! the opposite happens - an appeal to zero reference points...
Valery, 03.12.2017 18:37
Valery
interesting fact about adaptive: in sports betting there is an analogue of roulette, I tried to see how the adaptive algorithm works there, I saw an interesting feature, I started playing on it, adaptive worked clearly, like on the steering wheel, I think, well, I will transfer this visibility to live sports, where there is no adaptive, especially since the betting conditions are the same, and there are fewer options, as if I started playing the steering wheel, well, say, in dozens, WITHOUT ZERO, in pure RNG! And an amazing thing is that what worked in adaptive, and should have worked even better in live sports, turned out to be a dead zone!
vlados, 03.12.2017 18:20
vlados
Andrey, could you give a little more detail about the landmark...if it's not too much trouble
FoxDuhovny, 01.12.2017 15:24
FoxSpiritual
I work with large segments, without saving the research, I simply found it in an informative order, remembered it, deleted it... in 50-100 spins the control scenario and the match of the bet with the selected number will fit in and not at all because these can be repetitions, collisions, mirrors and other well-known figures of visual perception... the whole trick is in another reference point that is completely inaccessible to the average player...
Mira, 01.12.2017 11:41
Mira
There are global waves. On other 9800 spins or sections of 600 there will be other hot numbers, not 5 and 7. Someday we will wait for 10000 spins, where zero will also become a clear leader.
But such long periods will not help to play, because a session usually fits into 50-100 spins.
FoxDuhovny, 11/30/2017 07:32
FoxSpiritual
According to global statistics (9800 spins) in several segments of 600 spins the occurrence of zero is five times less than that of active numbers, for example 5 and 7, but there are segments of 600 spins where the occurrence of zero rises to the status of an active number along with 5 and 7, I have several versions of the reason for such surges in relation to Zero, but so far none of them have been found to have analytical confirmation due to the fact that I have not specifically studied zero for this purpose, but I will definitely do so, such a study is in my plans...

Green color visual perception... The image of a completed ring - Zero, as it is customary to call a sector on a roulette. In the dry virtual language of mathematics - sector 37, on which all the shifts available to the player are built! How did it happen that an ordinary sector turned into a royal symbol, a special sign of distinction, the mark of Lucifer, the magical beginning of some countdown... the magical apostrophe of the lord of gambling... You can come up with many meanings of the sector, but let's stop at sector 37 and there are reasons for this:

1. Mathematical calculations and processing of statistical data on the occurrence of numbers in a continuous sequence of a game session cannot be written in formulas with a zero value.

2. the game history involves several game parameters (deposit, bet amount, payout amount, bet size per number, number of spins, etc.) global calculations contain proportional calculations and division by zero is impossible in such cases.

3. the tables contain data and the value 37 is perceived correctly, unlike a letter character or a zero value...

Discussion started by FoxDuhovny , on November 21 02:43
Answers

Offer
Show all
FoxDuhovny, 26.11.2017 02:59
FoxSpiritual
Friends! Be careful in your actions on the roulette... If the coincidences do not have a cyclical nature or are found as coincidences no more than twice per session, then such coincidences should not be considered significant, exactly until the third and subsequent coincidences are obtained. This can happen after one, two or in some cases after several thousand spins, but the paradox is that if such a coincidence occurs, its methodical actions amaze the imagination and baffle intuitive assumptions, since following special bets in my case the coincidence shows that the choice of the adaptor falls on the only number in history that satisfies certain conditions...
vlados, 25.11.2017 19:13
vlados
Andrey, your specific version caught my attention...as did the previous squares of numbers with finals, thank you. We'll see...Oh my: "0" = 37 = in the forecast: 1-10-19-28. Simple and Congenial!
FoxDuhovny, 25.11.2017 12:29
FoxSpiritual
As for the sector 37 in roulette with NC for each spin, there are some peculiarities and diverse impressions. Different approaches to series of specially designed bets indicate the existence of several versions. For example, there is a version that when Zero falls out, the adaptive schemes for dialing numbers change, but when Zero is repeated, a return to the previous schemes is possible... There is a specific version in my practice when Zero belongs as number 37 to the final 1! (1,10,19,28,37). There is also a hypothesis that with active actions of the player leading to a progressive increase in the balance, Zero, like other specially selected numbers, participate in super-collisions...
Shpilevoy, 22.11.2017 14:57
Shpilevoy
@in the royal symbol, a special mark of distinction, the mark of Lucifer, the magical beginning of some countdown... the magical apostrophe of the lord of excitement...@

strongly!
FoxDuhovny, 22.11.2017 01:53
FoxSpiritual
If you use a very simple frontal effort, then the minimum bet with two empty numbers (one of them is Zero) and the maximum overlap in plus, for example, a bet of 1.44 (any 4 sixline to 0.25 + any 11 numbers to 0.04) remains an empty Zero and any of the 12 numbers, if every 3 spins you change the location of the sixlines and choose one of the last three dropped out in random order as a free number, then after a certain number of spins Zero will drop out, if you continue, Zero will drop out more often up to an open repeat.
vlados, 21.11.2017 20:34
vlados
And thank you for supporting and starting..."-Your call is very important for us!"
vlados, 21.11.2017 19:44
vlados
What I have come to at the moment... All that is needed is to cover zero on the field, except for predictive bets on numbers (what could be simpler? - although everything ingenious is simple;), because the adaptive one starts "shunning" there, in response to the player's smart bets... Perhaps further - more (more optimal)... Now we "have to" go from complex to simple in forecasting, which cannot but please and surprise! And if, purely hypothetically, we assume further forecasting of the zero falling out... It may be, it may be... We will alchemize...

Once again, tired of looking for the cause, I decided to start searching in a different direction.

I have long noticed that there are many systems that work on "hot" numbers , i.e. those that are more often in the field. After digging around in my brain, I decided to implement the following logic into my bot:

- we analyze the numerical series for repeating numbers and in the bet we select those that have dropped out in the last 7-10 spins relative to the numerical series. That is, for example, the last series was 6.8.9.2.15.6.3.5.22.11.32.8......

6 and 8 will go into the bet and so on... this requires analysis of the number series and constant regeneration of the bet for each spin, but the first day of my bot's flight shows good results! I started long-term tests waiting for the results

Discussion started by Makacim , on 03 October 05:42
Answers

Offer
Show all
Hunter, 14.10.2014 09:01
Hunter
So you see how the number of occurrences in neighbors increases and a hole is formed in your numbers and a fence of neighbors?
Have you ever thought that the fence can grow the same for all your numbers? i.e. if you expect 2, 5 comes up, then for the expected number 19 you need to move to 22.
moreover, watch, if it fell both to the right and to the left on the track, then very soon it will fall again to the right or to the left, and on the table in the same way
Makacim, 14.10.2014 07:26
Makacim
I currently have 2-5 numbers in the bet
ladder of progression up to 55-60 spins .... zones are being pushed through like crazy but there is that one sequence that ruins everything
Hunter, 14.10.2014 07:17
Hunter
You may want to reduce the number of numbers to 1-2, make them "donut holes", like in the Kulibin machine, and try to punch through these zones, each with 9 numbers.
Makacim, 14.10.2014 06:58
Makacim
screwed into the algorithm of hot not a weak ladder and soft progression, at a short distance 99% of bets play like clockwork .. with the duration of the session beyond the day there is an option when your bets smoothly enter the zone of cold and a drain occurs ... which periodically can be pulled out manually, but ... there is always a BUT
Makacim, 08.10.2014 12:48
Makacim
I lost it manually again - the bot was whining for the first half of the day - I got mad and lost it manually to 0
Makacim, 08.10.2014 10:27
Makacim
there were 2,600 fans... now I've somehow reached 2,100 and the bot had to be reconfigured for long-term wagering... it plays at 0.1 stake instead of 0.5
Makacim, 08.10.2014 10:09
Makacim
yeah, I'm starting to freak out I think I'm salting myself with these assaults
Hunter, 08.10.2014 10:05
Hunter
Apparently this is not the last approach, dig around before deleting
Makacim, 08.10.2014 09:47
Makacim
unfortunately it's gone... I updated the database and am storming this "peak" for the 20th time)
Hunter, 08.10.2014 09:26
Hunter
you can look at all your cases of approaching x2.5 to see what is happening there? and the moment before the drain began - spins 10-15 back in each case, maybe you will see something repeating in the casino's reaction.
Hunter, 08.10.2014 07:25
Hunter
it turns out that in profit at the x2.5 level adaptive is turned on. a simple return will not give anything, look for a way to pass the wave (flat, for example), and then try again in the same style - either it will drown, or you will slip through to the x5 level
Makacim, 08.10.2014 07:13
Makacim
got stuck and back to square one
Makacim, 08.10.2014 06:04
Makacim
something "stuck" I can't jump over any x2 bar the bot reaches 2.5 and drains - reaches - drains .. and this has happened 5 times already
Makacim, 08.10.2014 04:11
Makacim
tournament pro balance almost x2
Makacim, 08.10.2014 03:05
Makacim
I stopped at x4 and for now I've sharpened the points I need with a file now the bot is taking the top spots of the Pro tournament again so far I'm not in the red ))
Hunter, 07.10.2014 07:00
Hunter
pleases
Makacim, 07.10.2014 06:30
Makacim
2000 spins - x4
Makacim, 07.10.2014 03:54
Makacim
1500 spins - x3.5
Makacim, 06.10.2014 17:38
Makacim
1200 spins... x3!
Hunter, 06.10.2014 14:12
Hunter
from my observations, adaptive catches everything that can be brought under some algorithm from the player's side. any puzzle algorithm for us, for it it's just a matter of time. will find our repeating moments and merge. the element of surprise is needed
Makacim, 06.10.2014 10:00
Makacim
tired 730 - spins x 2.5
Makacim, 06.10.2014 07:37
Makacim
400 spins multiplied by 2....
Makacim, 06.10.2014 05:13
Makacim
casino plays with the wave
over a long period of time I see that the game smoothly brings balance, then takes it away
at the same time, this wave gradually carries you into the minus
I decided to "play around" for fun and added my DNA to the system
we are waiting for the result... let's see what happens in 10,000 spins
Makacim, 06.10.2014 04:37
Makacim
you can fit everything into the algorithm
Hunter, 04.10.2014 04:43
Hunter
Have you tried using flat progressions?
for example, you have a game of 12 numbers and you have a bank for 10 spins.
your bet should play on average 1 time in 3 spins. it plays 6 or 7 times and played 7 or 8 times. this is almost triple the average.
It's like a fish on a fishing rod - they're testing you to see if you'll go all the way with your bank.
After such a deviation, you reverse the progression and play flat and wait.
You must have a series of misses equal to the number of spins equal to your bankroll + 1 spin.
then after this has happened and the first spin with your numbers has come up, you play immediately with a triple bet, if you miss, you decrease the bet size by 1, if you hit, you increase it by 1. something like that. having won back all the losses and having come out on top, you switch to the usual progression and again wait for a triple deviation from the average. and all over again. Surely this can be put into the algorithm?
Hunter, 03.10.2014 16:42
Hunter
yes, this tit will be drained by adaptive in the end. aim for the displacements after the first deviation of a triple size from the average.
InquisitorEA, 03.10.2014 12:48
InquisitorEA
We've already tried this. 2 repetitions for some number of spins (also about 10-15) - we put it in the third repetition. Nothing sensible came out, as you understand.
Makacim, 03.10.2014 06:25
Makacim
the accuracy of the forecast sometimes just kills with its accuracy! But let's not get ahead of ourselves...we're waiting

Everyone is equal, but the birthday has saved me more than once when I only had enough money for 1-2 moves :woohoo: how can you not love it? :blink: