Visual ballistics on a tape measure

Well, look - we bet at random - we can win or lose, but in the long run, playing like this, we will lose 2.7% of what we have bet. Naturally, the player is not happy with this, so we need to look for ways to bypass mathematics. One way or another, the player must create a situation where, with a payout of 36, the ball had fewer than 36 opportunities, and not 37 as it is now. Just imagine that you can put an invisible object in a cell that will not allow the ball to stop there, and imagine that you have 5 such objects, it turns out that the ball has 32 opportunities, but the payout is 36!!! So, we need to look and think about what could be those invisible plugs that prevent the ball from landing in some cells ... The ballistics game itself is quite complex and one way to simplify it is to split what needs to be done into several team members. Then everyone watches only what he is responsible for.... The wheel moves counterclockwise, the ball goes clockwise. There is about a 1.5 second difference between the first and third pictures The first shows a situation where the ball hits the deflector above number 33, then in the second it rolls along the numbers and in the third it stops at number 32. In short, it rolled 16 numbers from the first hit to the stop. From this it is quite clear that we can watch in the casino and write down how long the ball rolls after the first hit. From what we wrote down, we can derive something average or median or something else - in other words, find how often the ball rolls most often and in which zone it lands from the initial hit, say 90% of cases. If the wheel is considered good, then in 90% of cases there will be no more than 20 numbers with a much higher frequency in the center of dispersion. In a word, you can determine some better distance from the first hit, I think it is clear that in this case we simply use statistics and functions of this craft. Well, and naturally you can name the zone where the ball almost never stops - that is, where there is that plug. The point of the first hit remains in question. I will not go into detail here, just believe that there are people who, thanks to some gadgets - "like those paper devices", or some measuring instruments, or even just using some rhythmic counting - can determine this point quite accurately. Therefore, they can know not only where the ball will fall, but also where - almost certainly it will not land. Again, these are the plugs that prevent the ball from settling where you don't want them to settle... But they are they, maybe "superhumans", but the question arises, is it possible for us - mere mortals, to do something a little similar and get some benefit from it. It turns out that there is no need for any super abilities here - very often it is enough to have good observation, some memory and, alas - but you need to be able to use some mathematical formulas and functions... I think it is clear that by betting and accordingly measuring something after the throw you can achieve much better results, but online this is quite rare, although there are several casinos where the bet is closed somewhere in the middle between the throw and the fall of the ball. I know a person in the States who probably won more than 10 million and writes very actively in those forums where basically everyone thinks that after 10 black - red - well, it certainly has more chances to appear ... naturally, he is not met there very friendly ... If we admit that at the end of the spin there are such situations when we can say quite accurately that some numbers almost do not have the opportunity to grab the ball, then it would be logical to continue that with some training we can do it earlier. It's like a high jump - if we can jump two meters - then we can jump two meters + 1 cm, and so on ad infinitum. Vrule also ad infinitum . I think many have heard such a term as "Dealer's handwriting" or "Wheel handwriting". Some even try to apply something from that. However, probably 99% of them do something that in reality has no effect on the result. Well, then there is talk that everything worked - then something changed and stopped working. In reality, nothing worked for them - there was just some kind of dispersion deviation and it only seemed that something was working... And what is their main mistake, what are they doing wrong? And the mistake is this - they all look at the starting point - for example, 0 and the ending point. Sees 0-5, then +19, sees 0-17, then +8. Well, and collects statistics from these +/- and makes some conclusions. However, all these conclusions are not worth a dime... Why? Because they compare - the incomparable. This is something similar to when we want to compare two distances by comparing meters and not paying attention to kilometers - for example, we have 2,300 KM and we have 1,700 km - 300 and 700 are meters, if we make an average - we get 500, and the real average is (2,300 + 1,700) / 2 = 2,000, that is, the remainder on average is not 500 but 000.

the answer to the question of where to start is to review the video on a good video editor where you can rewind frame by frame. The only problem here is that people often think that they can achieve something by reviewing several spins in half an hour. Here I will disappoint you - you need to spend hundreds or even thousands of hours .... there is only one option to feel like a ballista - this is done like this 1. You need to imagine that you are a ballista and you know where the ball will fall and what the number will be. 2. you watch the live broadcast and at the moment of the fall / impact with the diamond you look at what the number is under it. 3. Write down this number and write down where the ball stopped, writing down how many pockets in the direction of the ball's movement this happened) 4. Enter everything in Excel and get two columns: prediction and reality. 5. Enter a correction for your mistakes / other behavior of the ball on the ball track (in a real game, no ballista knows 100 percent of the exact number over which the strike will occur - they know approximately, but in the experiment you write down exactly. To make it look like in a real game, we enter mistakes - let's say you constantly make mistakes +/- 3 numbers and rarely +/- 18. Let's say for 10 spins the mistakes will be like this = 0 = 1 = - 1 = - 2 = 2 = 2 = 3 = 3 = - 3 = - 15. In short, you can imitate a good ballista, an average one, or a beginner using mistakes. Mix those mistakes and randomly assign them as column 3, you should get something like this: From which it is clear that 90% of the ball stops in the range of 8-27 from your prediction and if this is the case in the game, then by opening 22 pockets you get 90% of hits, which means 9*36=324/(22*10=220)=47% advantage over the casino....

In general, there is such a concept as "advantageous play". This is a game when a player somehow tries to create a situation in which he has not -2.7% as a mathematical bet but +xx. And the player can achieve this in quite different ways. However, all of these methods are united by the fact that the player uses some weaknesses of the opponent (roulettes). How this is done is not news to all poker players - all this is used by millions in poker. Specifically, statistics are collected on the opponent and, for example, if from those statistics it is clear that for a large bet, say the size of the bank, he falls, say 70% - then you can exploit this by betting it with any hand and in 70% we will win and in 30% we will lose and in total we will be in profit. The same is done with roulette - for example, numbers are collected and if we see that some numbers fall out more often - we just bet on them. The point is that more often it can be just by chance, but it can also be for some reason. And we play on the fact that there is a reason. This is a kind of rough example, but still, it probably best reflects what needs to be done at the table. What to watch and what to collect is not so important, the point is to understand the goal of what we are achieving, and we achieve that previous observations give a hint - what will happen in the future. You just take a video of the spin and study them. What does it mean to study - this is to try to understand the connection between the past and the future. The first part of the spin and the end of the spin, what was in the first thousand spins and what will be in the next 200. If you understand this connection, you can look at everything differently. There are now a lot of things on the Internet, you can just download them on YouTube. I don’t know if it is customary here or not to give direct links, and whether it is correct, but just use Google and you will find it. The same about the method itself, there are several sites where they are described in detail, if you read English - you can read it, if not, then now there are translators - I think it will not be difficult to figure it out. If we have a database of 200 spins - volumes have both the past and the future. For the first spin - the fiftieth is the future, and for the 50th - the first is the future.

. I test for what my chances of winning are, that is, how long the ball travels from a certain moment, which is the same for all spins, to a stop, and look at the dispersion. This is a kind of statistical method in which the maximum dispersion of distances, the frequency of distances in the middle part of the dispersions, etc. are estimated. That is, I try to find a functional connection between the slowdown of the ball and the distance traveled. If everything goes according to the laws of physics, there is a fairly clear functional connection. If that connection is difficult to find, there is a suspicion that something can influence the distance traveled by the ball ... Another simpler way, however, can sometimes be quite expensive - just calculate how much you lose at some time and how much you supposedly should have lost .... However, the point here is not how much you guess, but how often you confidently know that you will hit. There may be situations when I hit less than 50, but I will be in a huge plus. And I can hit 65 but the result can only be close to zero... In reality, all ballistics ends when a certain point on the wheel is determined, as in the example above - the point of what number is under the ball at the moment of fall (this is only one of the options, it does not mean that this point is looked for by everything). But then mathematics, statistics, data processing, optimization processes come into play. I think that the measurement itself and obtaining a reference point is only 10-30% of success - everything else is not related to physics .... In order to use something, you need to take data from as similar situations as possible - let's say in my example this is the point where the ball falls - if this is the case and at the moment that we foresee and the fall occurs - we have ideally identical situations after our prediction .... What I want to draw attention to is easiest to do on the basis of visual ballistics, namely - as the idols of this sphere were Laurens, Caleb, Christian, 20 years ago, when I came to the wheel, so only they remained. Since there are such examples - people who won millions - why is there no influx of other players into their circle? In poker, names change, in tennis - they change, in roulette - everything is the same .... For someone who has the necessary education and enough time to analyze - it will not be too difficult to figure it out himself. Those who studied according to the military principle - do it once, do it twice, or if this way then that way, and if that way then that way - did not achieve success. Too many components. I tried to teach some - no options, only ruined my nerves... I always compared roulette with an iceberg - what we see is only a very small part and not significant at that - everything that is important is hidden from your eyes. GAME OF LUCK and other names were invented by those who are on the other side. And the goal of all this was so that as few people as possible thought about the possibility of winning...

But sometimes there comes a dark hour when I feel a thirst for revenge... or something, apparently some kind of anger against the casino, against a specific dealer, and I continue to play when I should leave and start looking for another victim. Well, I lose several times more than I could before realizing the fact that this wheel is too tough for me. I win and lose about the same number of times. The whole point is to win more when you win than to lose when you can't win... You all believe in a magic wand... I don't know how you can share training... the whole game, it doesn't even matter if it's poker, roulette... it's just a set of statistics and using them. If we play poker and know that Pupkin folds to my three-bet in 70% of cases, we have the following picture: in 70% we take what Pupkin has bet and get back our own, in 30% the situation is unclear and let's say that Pupkin will be ahead 90%-10% of the money that has already been bet "X". We make a simple calculation and see that there is approximately 0.7 * X + 0.1 * X> 0.2 * 3 * X 0.8 * X> 0.6 * X, that is, we can three-bet Pupkin with any card and this will be a plus for us. That is, we three-bet and when we have shit, and Pupkin has over-twisted - we calmly fold and think about what to do when he doesn't over-twist, or when we have approximately - nat. And from all this we will have, say, 10-20% profit... It is the same with roulette and other games - we simply find, create such a situation, which gives us a plus in itself, and exploit it. Nothing supernatural, no fraud - either sleight of hand, or mathematical knowledge - most often about the level of the 7th grade...