Based on the video Roulette's Game 8. Marathon

I really liked this video for commenting, it sounds in full "Roulette's Game 8. Marathon +100'000 USD Profit casino" on the channel Boris Ruban My attention was drawn at the very beginning to the collected statistics, i.e. missed spins before entering the game. For clarity, I will rewrite: 14- 9- 32- 14- 9- 13- 33- 31- 34- 9- 26- 3- 6- 25- 5- 32- 21- 29- 11- 24- 18- 25- 9- 3- 30- 10- 22- 24- 9- 4- 32- 6- 0- 34- 24- 27- 6- 0- 26- 9- 4- 24- 25- 10- 26- 26- 14- 29- 33- 34- 3- 28- 9- 8- 30- 29- 14- 16- 34- 17- 16- 13- 28- 20- 9- 0- 8-9- 16-21- 15..... Yes, the nine is clearly in the hot zone here, even in the first 30-spin series 5 times. But my eye caught a trend that is very clearly evident in this area around this number. It will be clearly visible on the screenshots how the events developed: 1. Number 9 - on the third move 9 2. Number 9 - on the third move the first neighbor on the track 31 3. Number 9 - on the third move mirror inversion 6 (Just for myself for now) 4. Number 9 - not on the third, but the first neighbor on the track is a little "late" (on the fourth move) 22 5. Number 9 - on the third move a mirror inverted 6 (see point 3) 6. Number 6 (yes, this is not 9), but it's interesting that it falls on thethird move. On the third move (as ordered) - 9 7. Number 9 - on the third move no, but the second neighbor on the track is a little "late" (on the fourth move) 14 8. Number 9 - on the third move 9 A couple more spins - and I have an association (from the music) with Carmen's habanera - Shpilevoy's exit with Geometr17. Shpilevoy has already paid attention to such templates in his videos, tried to catch numbers, here is also a good visual area for such a pick-up of the trend. But Shpilevoy in this video was aimed at Geometer 17, did not get distracted.

Shpilevoy often plays his combinations up to 2L. Maybe that's why "obvious" things fall on the third move? :evil: