Is he spying or calculating? (FoxDuhovny archive)

Andrey wrote: So! The number of spins for the first X2 in the medium term is from 100 to 200 spins.

x2 can be done in 10-15 spins, but this is a high-risk path, 100-130 spins is optimal, with the ability to wait, try to carry out different attacks. In the end, any number will almost always fall out in a cycle of 130 spins. Although history knows of 1500 frozen ones.

Long shutdowns (freezing) of number combinations (pairs and triplets mainly) are explained by the adaptive counteraction mode (BAA - adaptive combat activity), which itself does not turn off until a certain control moment. There are three versions of the onset (disabling) of counteraction or a decrease in the BAA level: 1. The number of lost spins 2. The time of player inactivity (non-use of the resource) 3. Adjustment of the RNG mode (pseudo-RNG) From personal observations, I can explain that in the first case we are talking specifically about the quantitative value of lost spins (the size of bets and the number of deposits are not taken into account). In the second case, the player's inactivity for more than 3 days forces the program to redistribute resources to other players and an internal programmatic shutdown of the adaptive occurs. There is a pitfall here - information about the player's strategy remains operationally available and is activated from the first hit. In the third case, we are talking about cycles of several hundred spins (more than 500 spins). Three adaptive cycles are built from approximately 1500-1800 spins, of which only one in 500-600 spins is favorable for the game (favorability for the player is 80/20 - Pareto rule), another cycle of 500-600 adjusts the pseudo-RNG (favorability for the player is 50/50), and one of the three cycles is a counteraction cycle or a maximum BAA cycle (for the player it is 20/80 - Pareto in reverse). To become a Pro, you need to learn to manage the process in all three cycles in a positive growth rhythm.

Andrey writes:

Long-term shutdowns (freezing) of number combinations (pairs and triplets mainly) are explained by the adaptive counteraction mode

Long-term shutdown (freezing) is a relative concept. To say "freezing of a combination" - you first need to know how many this combination should "ideally" fall out per 1000 spins. And then start from this value. For example: The player catches 23-32. As an entry point, number 23 appeared 25 times in a segment of 1316 spins, But 23-32 did not play even once. Is there any reason to say that the combination is frozen? Maybe this is still normal. So how much is "normal"? (I personally counted on the segment of 1316 spins how many times the entry point for four combinations appears and how many times the combination itself works on this segment. But this is not enough to name the average value.)

So! If each cycle is 600 spins and 3 cycles are different, then for the correct calculation you need at least 9 cycles - 5400 spins. A frozen combination will play for 5400 spins no more than 2 times and, as a rule, in a favorable 600-spin cycle, a frozen combination will never play. It is considered normal for a specific combination to play from 4 to 6 spins, with all spins being played in a favorable 600-spin cycle. It happens that a combination plays in all cycles up to 11 times and this means that such a combination has never been collected by a player! Sometimes I deliberately skipped "exposed" combinations to see the dominant feature (collision) and track the inclusion.

To keep the adaptive under control and stay on the balance plus, all shots in numbers from 1 to 4 numbers are charged strictly within the maximum bet size limit. If the bet size differs by at least 0.01, the adaptive will quickly react... Make it a rule not to change the total bet size if you need to re-spin an unfavorable cycle.

Andrey wrote: Is there an alternative way without using the SMR bot?

Yes, completely change the strategy and tap yourself in parallel while watching how your connections return