Is he spying or calculating? (FoxDuhovny archive)

In short, the results table will be made in the image of the betting protocol, synchronously for each spin and for each 30-ku also with a cumulative total! And it will also be reoriented to 7 sectors exactly as in the protocol =EOEOOE or S37, S29, S14, S24, S21, S6, S30. However, the results table will be double (2 x 7) for the activity of drops and for the financial result, each separately. The protocol will remain only for financial results, there is no need for activity there. I have prepared a deposit, I will rebuild and recheck and the marathon will begin with zero statistics! As soon as I collect 600 spins - 20 thirties, then it will be possible to analyze something ... If during this time x3 is made on the balance - a standard practice for all versions of the matrices, then it will be possible to pilot the scenario for multiplication.

I made a prototype with a variant without synchronization for each spin and each thirty, since it is quite difficult to develop a copyable version of formulas. Excel is too stupid and contains a lot of "pitfalls" not specified by the developers in the description of formulas! The syntax I came up with: link-text-link does not imply copying a section with the default copy step provided inside the program! I hope that the program will understand my idea somehow is not an option. The simplest and most reliable is to MANUALLY write 180 variants of 30 spin tables with a step of 30. That is, starting from the second row in column B, manually change the value of the array B11:B5410 180 times with autoreplacement instead of B5410 to make a step of 30, i.e. B11:B40 and then the cumulative total with a step of 30 - B11:B70 and so on up to 5410 for each of the functions CountIf and SumIf 180 times, a total of 360 manual entries! Or, I'll rack my brain and figure out how to make a step, understandable for Excel by the method of trial copies... For the betting protocol, everything is done, but here I slowed down a bit! 360 times to register many arrays with autoreplacement, there is a risk of erroneous actions, maybe it will be possible to find a simple solution for the program...

I built the matrix, started a smooth rise, for the first session 30 spins plus 6 credits, for the second session the first 7 spins plus 9 credits, I put the game aside, I'll continue later... I'm a little confused about bets with a cumulative total, but it's a matter of habit... the main point is concentrated around odd-even and hot dozens....

klick wrote:

FoxDuhovny wrote: I have reasonable doubts about the reputation of the CC and the way the CC is used, in how it is used in the gaming industry.

Imagine that you are an honest casino and you create a series of roulette spins for each player in advance. How would you guarantee the player that you created the series and did not change anything in it during his game?

I don't want to imagine anything! I want to understand the business model of the Profit casino. The concept of honesty is not applicable to business at all! Therefore, there are acceptable losses and mutually beneficial cooperation. However, in the gaming industry, the principle of interaction with the client is insider information, where the client is offered conditions that he is unable to check with the tools used in licensing and accrediting a specific resource before issuing him permission to use software in a specific country. I have only indirect criteria, in which methodical actions lead to different results depending on the bet size and attack parameters of specific adaptive responses ... The question is not whether the player can hit a specific number with a bet or not, the question is what his hit depends on. Or, more simply, if the bet suits the casino, then the client hits the number with a bet, if the bet does not suit the casino, then it does not matter whether the series is guessed in advance or not, the player will not hit the number with a bet. This is exactly the principle that I have been observing at Profit Casino for several months now with every deposit. And when I started playing and my bets had not yet been processed by the adaptive system for the purpose of balance control, the bet would periodically hit the number. For comparison, I can enter the tournament again in February and collect 14K+ with 1000 FAN, and if necessary increase to 16K+ and further... And everything will work like clockwork, but in reality such a trick does not work - really?! And for what reason??? Well, yes, who will let you win with 15 credits... and even with a claim to X100...

I spent another deposit and again tried to calculate the answers based on the betting protocol and results, and again the strange behavior of the adaptive depending on the bet size, which cannot be combined with the series of numbers guessed in advance. So far, we can confidently say that the bet size directly affects the appearance of a specific number in a specific spin, regardless of whether the number corresponds to any priority or not. As Shpilevoy told me earlier - the claim to win determines the actions of the adaptive. Such an influence of the bet size on the appearance of the next number calls into question at least two of the 4 parameters that form the hashing of the string...

FoxDuhovny wrote: I don't want to imagine anything! I want to understand the business model of the Profit casino. The concept of honesty is not applicable to business at all! Therefore, there are acceptable losses and mutually beneficial cooperation. However, in the gaming industry, the principle of interaction with the client is insider information, where the client is offered conditions that he is unable to check with the tools used in licensing and accreditation of a specific resource before issuing him a permit to use software in a specific country. I have only indirect criteria, in which methodical actions lead to different results depending on the bet size and attack parameters of specific adaptive responses ... The question is not whether the player can hit a specific number with his bet or not, the question is what his hit depends on. Or, more simply, if the bet suits the casino, then the client hits the number with his bet, if the bet does not suit the casino, then it does not matter whether the series is guessed in advance or not, the player will not hit the number with his bet. This is exactly the principle I have been observing at Profit Casino for several months now with every deposit. And when I started playing and my bets had not yet been processed by the adaptive balance control, the bet would periodically hit the number. For comparison, I can enter the tournament again in February and get 14K+ from 1000 FAN, and if necessary increase to 16K+ and further... And everything will work like clockwork, but in reality such a trick does not work - really?! And for what reason??? Well, yes, who will let you win with 15 credits... and even with a claim to X100...

1. I have such suspicions too. But there is no evidence of the possibility of manipulation with sha256.
2. The next tournament is in the works!
3. What is or how much is 1 credit?