Apriorica from Vitalik KWN (PARADOX of choosing a betting forecast)

Edwerk writes:

Allt2005 also calculated with a +1 shift. This is called "overlap counting".

for Edwerk

How do you answer the riddle posed by Abraham Lincoln:
"If a dog's paws are counted as a tail, how many paws does a dog have?"

(I found this problem in a book by the famous American mathematician, logician, Taoist philosopher, magician-prestidigitator Raymond Smullyan.)

Allt2005 also calculated with a shift of +1. This is called "overlap counting". But in segments, in the case of Queenstar, not by 10 spins but by 37 spins. That's why it turns out that out of a million tested spins, it's 37 million. This is already better than just a million, for long run evaluation.

Let's not rush to conclusions. Let's look at his version of efficiency as applied to strategies, 30 years of experience in the game.
One negative session is minus 10% of the entire game bank.
If, over a period of 37 spins, some numbers are repeated more often than others, then it is worth paying attention to the table.
The ball's memory is phantom, short-term. Scientifically, this cannot be called memory. The term "phantom memory" is used.
The goal of testing in 2017 was to recruit a working group, with which he traveled to the earthly halls. I work for someone else, so I did not join the project. There was no need to pay. The server simply took a percentage of the plus for itself.
Bankroll was invested in players.

Review 2021 from Shpilevoy at the request of the author of the program "Paradox".
The author of the Paradox program is Vitaly Kvinstar /Apriori channel/. The Paradox program is used to play casino roulette.
////////////////////////////////////////////
I also liked the title of this video on the Apriori channel, let's take a look:



1) "Paradox No. 1" which no one has ever used in roulette = this is an invention of the elderly Quinstar
For example, look at this generation = 5, 12, 17, 4, 0, 36, 36, 2, 24, 6, 1
How many direct replays do you think there are in this GAME?
Obviously one is 36-36.
And Vitalik will tell you that there are = SEVEN of them!!! ))))) because he will go through the entire generation with a step (shift) of +1 and he will dig up as many as 7 segments, in which there will be 36-36....
Moreover, this game is not 11 spins long, but 11+10+9+8+7+6+5+4+3+2+1 = who knows how many ))))

2) The rest of the points in the video need to be understood in his monologues....
"The roulette ball has no memory! But it does!" = very promising ))) just a shame to waste time...
"You've already digested many topics, but it doesn't work for you and won't work, because you don't know everything"... === so why the hell lie to the public, if it works for you alone?
"This winning model won't work for everyone"= fuck! So let's just have 100 people put their entire credit into a spike in three moves to increase, and whoever it works for will give 25% to the author... and the rest move in orderly rows to the SOUTH, Vitaly warned right away that IT WILL NOT WORK FOR EVERYONE ))))

//////////////////
in the end he does admit it in passing ))) the devil is in the details

a) you must believe him blindly
b) it will be a painful path of trial and error (ideally each time with a confirmed YOUR credit of 2000 ante)
c) you will spend YEARS working towards your goal
d) he does not accept any criticism = he has no time to convince (or desire to demonstrate TRANSPARENT FULL STATISTICS of results)
d) developing a strategy is a "curse" and only a blind performer can successfully play it... a-a-a-a-a-a-a!!!! hold me seven! ))))

////////////
Well, what can I say? I don't have time for this nonsense ))))
Vitaly Queenstar = trying to fool people... demand it from him

1) let Paradox make a free public program for free tests IN REAL TIME, and not according to pre-collected and imported statistics
2) since it is fully automatic, let it give simple instructions on how to press 2 buttons, without any conditional and non-linear choices (to cut off the manipulation of shifting the blame for losing to the player)
3) let him not delete negative reviews = if the program lost, the public should know about such cases too )))

and otherwise
PARADOX and QUINSTAR === A PRIORI === SCAM

Vitalik KWN took a course for young video bloggers? = started waving branches in the frame "correctly" ))))... how primitive it all is! But the editing of the videos and the design are top notch.

I'll comment with a fresh look



1) the casino feeds the small static jerk = the player must believe in his "magic bet" and increase it )))
2) "an architect should only design, not lay bricks" = how convenient! He doesn't play, he teaches ))))
3) "there are a billion tactical variations, but only a small number work" = in hindsight, everyone is smart, the problem is the accuracy of the predictions
4) "when the goal of public testing was achieved, the project was closed" = what was the actual goal?
5) a kick from me personally = why can't a person check the work of his program in REAL_TIME??? how is that? collect statistics for several blocks of 200-300 spins, we'll load it into the program and it will show beautiful cartoons???? nonsense and a scam (I'll repeat again, everyone is smart in hindsight)
6) "you must prove that you have a full bank of 2000 ante" = also nonsense, the player takes the risk and can try to spin with -200 chips.... or does the program always lose -2000 before it starts working? )))
7) rent for 25% of the profit..... = not bad, yes... but where is it? If the author is such a good guy and wants a share of the profit, then why, with his 1000% tales of success, doesn't he finance his 2000 ante for the players himself or at least compensate for "rare" losses/damages?

the answer is simple )))
Vitalik expects that out of 100 people, some % will plus in a week and give him 25%, and he will send the rest to the SOUTH for butterflies... = this is how it works for all scammers

Alatissa wrote: for Edwerk
How do you answer the riddle posed by Abraham Lincoln:
"If a dog's paws are counted as a tail, how many paws does a dog have?"
(I found this problem in a book by the famous American mathematician, logician, Taoist philosopher, magician-prestidigitator Raymond Smullyan.)

Isn't that so?
"How many paws does a dog have, if the tail we call it a paw?"
Most of the audience said five. Then Lincoln replied, "No, there are still four. A tail called a paw is not a paw."