☢ Adaptive casino (counter-scheme generations, gasket between the RNG and the player)

All casinos look into your eyes and say - "WE HAVE FAIR ROULETTE, EVERYTHING IS IN THE HANDS OF CHANCE". And this is understandable, otherwise, hundreds of thousands of players will go to court with accusations of fraud against the casino and lawsuits for compensation of all their lost money. Influencing the game is a CRIMINAL. Although who will show the regulations governing the operation of casino games? On the other hand, the casino only provides a platform for games and the set of games with the described rules. If we consider roulette, then modern roulette is a slot machine. It does not matter how it is executed, drawn or video broadcast - it is a slot machine. And like any slot machine, roulette is controlled by a built-in program, everything else is external entourage. The main function of the program is to calculate the game, issue pseudo-random numbers, ENSURE THE COLLECTION OF A GIVEN PERCENTAGE OF MONEY TURNOVER to the casino cashier. If the owner sets % = 2.7, then such a roulette will almost completely correspond to those roulettes that were in the 18th century I take the liberty of asserting that current roulettes work on a collection % of around 20-30. That is, the program organizes an interesting game, with ups and downs of the player's credit. But in fact, the money is redistributed between the participants, while the program does not forget: 1) to pinch off the required % for the owner 2) to align the statistics (usually in the range of 2000 spins) To keep people coming back, a good adaptive makes the game interesting: 1) too often they enter THROUGH THE BOARD from the fattest number in the bet (on the field or track) 2) too often they enter the PREVIOUS BOLD number (you can hold it as long as you like, but as soon as the player leaves it - it falls out in a super short period) 3) too often the adaptive puts EXACTLY IN THE MIDDLE between two fat centers of the bet 4) collision patterns flourish, which make the statistics board INCREDIBLY FABIOUS

---

Often heard from opponents of the term ADAPTIVE "how to determine from the available data: is the roulette in front of us or an excel?" "You will see all the same collisions and adaptive responses, but there [for example, Excel or Random.org] they simply do not exist." Of course, in the RAND() column of Excel there is no adaptive it is really a set of numbers in which we can see both collisions and all sorts of distortions. You must understand a simple thing - Excel and roulette are things from different planets, even realities! Excel cannot provide you with a situation when you bet 8 and 11 completes, and in 70% of cases you get an empty 30 number Or in a situation of killed 28 and 29, an empty 7 or 12 will stubbornly fall. Today I played in an earthly casino. The man stubbornly placed neighbors 14 and 23 numbers on the track - if on the other side of the wheel the numbers fell more or less "sort of by accident", then in this half the ball entered exclusively 33,24,16 You simply have not seen the MIRACLES of physics on earth - how the ball is laid out: how it sticks, how it flies over the top of the vertical canoes, how it is stretched across half the track to the sector IT needs, how it goes down to the fat center and then slowly rolls out beyond the very edge of the playing numbers (some can insure 2/3 of the wheel), etc. And these miracles happen more than once a year The game consists of them! It's just that TOO OBVIOUS THROUGHS happen once every 10-20 spins, and so everything looks natural to most. At the same time, engineers on earth had to sweat to create MECHANISMS. And NOTHING is needed online, visualization at the level of physical objects is not needed. EVERYTHING IS DECIDED BY THE VIRTUAL COMPUTER PROGRAM = ADAPTIVE. In fact, ADAPTIVE is a dealer who, with each spin, places THE NUMBER THAT HE CONSIDERS NECESSARY. Why, with 8 and 11 set, only 70% fall into the empty 30? Adaptive makes a multi-level choice of number. Perhaps, the need to give the winnings to another terminal (for the arrangement that the player placed) or the need to align some number of statistics is now a higher priority. But in any case, pp. 1 - 4 IN THE GAME will go off the scale and this is a SIGN OF THE PRESENCE OF AN ADAPTIVE IN THE GAME. If I look at some statistics (and usually they give a piece taken out of context), and do not know the player's bets - I can not say 100% that this is ADAPTIVE and not a random coincidence. But, based on my experience of the game, I know that adaptive is involved almost always. Only understanding the laws of its work, its character in a particular casino, its current goals! gives an ADVANTAGE to the PLAYER. I repeat, playing with adaptive is like a pair dance. You must know the habits of your "partner" - what she is led by and what "pas" she performs with pleasure. In any case, the casino must have a reserve of money collected from other players, so that you can pump the dispa and choose the "surplus" for yourself. Then you should not fall into the trap of your greed. Only a clear working shoulder and BRM will allow you not to lose profit. At the end, you put your earnings on withdrawal and take a break in this casino - give other players a chance to "spin money" (replenish the game bank) and at the same time wait for a break so that your personal pay-outs cool down and you return to the category of "regular" player.

---

A separate big topic is roulettes with fairness control (FC). There, the adaptor is forced to not only look at the current betting situation and decide "GIVE/TAKE and HOW MUCH". On roulettes with FC - the adaptor must calculate one step ahead the player's strategies/habits/features/patterns and give out spins in advance.

Another question that worries many - "If the program is in charge of everything, how can you always be in the black?" Easy! The main thing for the adaptive is to collect % of the turnover for the owner. The rest of the money he happily gives back to the players. The adaptive can solder someone to an endless loss and the marker of the end of the "black period" will be either a skip of spins, or a sharp decrease in bets, or zero credit. I have seen thousands of games, when the roulette pours x2 x3 for a person with any credit and then turns on the sucking mode - when rare small payments do not cover even half of the bets. The money naturally goes to other players (in line, sons of bitches! ) and the person, instead of freezing at least "with his own", continues to guppate and add more money to the game. Thus, the adaptive quickly accumulates "surpluses" and you just need to withdraw them wisely. Particularly successful days always follow mass flooding of fat wallets the day before. How come all high rollers end up losing? Why doesn't the roulette redistribute between them? Roulette is a production machine. If you overstay (stay too long), then the suction on the swings turns on in order to bring your balance to zero in 10-30 minutes and a "new" player can take your place. If the flow of money coming into the system begins to have a geometric character, then the roulette considers it that someone has "buttoned up" and enters the total selection mode. The exit from it will be either when the entire system is rebooted, or when the wheel guts everyone to the end and there will be a long pause (almost no one will play and the volume of infusions will sharply and for a long time fall). FASTENING is superprofit and a furious increase in turnover, because a person after losing 2000 puts in another 2000, then 4000, then 10000. And all because: a) he feels sorry for the money he has already lost b) he has a fresh memory of an easy rise, of crazy solutions c) he sees how people win nearby d) he thinks of fighting back by increasing the stakes The mathematics is simple. If 10000 were put into the roulette, I count on 1/2 of this amount. After x2 x3 credits, my game becomes cautious. If 10 spins do not have a single solution in plus, I back off (pause). My stakes are "sandwich" with a search for the type that the roulette likes now and it executes fat centers. I already wrote about this here on the site www.100pravda.com/profi/coin-book-viigrat-u-kazino/121

the main thing is not to get into periods of strict money selection and to be friends with your head when the roulette allows you to make x10 or x100

Business trip to Odessa with other CMP miners. We hit 3 halls then. When you play a lot, there are moments of obvious inconsistency with physics that only a blind person would not see. If such moments do not make you think about what is happening, then this is pathology. But when a person begins to understand the mechanics, then all these "previous", "overboard", "rolling in and out", "freezing and sticking" become transparent and logical. Plus the stories that I have already told a) how a live steering wheel with no stuffing is bankrupted (there are people who travel around cities and look for (!) such casinos) b) how the owners of one casino decided to save money and ordered the stuffing from a local criminal Kulibin, drove him around the casinos where such things worked. And he turned out to be an acquaintance of my acquaintance. c) I heard the confessions of one pedal Vasya and saw his closet when the cops were pressing him. Plus acquaintance and work in NIMB when a bet on 5 numbers expects a win no more than 4-5 spins. Then it's simple - when your strategies are built on the right foundation (control of the game by the adaptive), then building up a plus becomes simple and easy. I also had to travel around the cities, because after a SERIES of knockouts of 100+k I received blacklists from entire networks. Today, I am excited by high roller games with results from x100. And I get my advantage over -2.7 from the adaptive. We are friends.

"UNLUCKY" person ACCORDING to the OPINION of mathematicians-losers

---

For me everything is obvious and clear... 1) Well, was it really done for IDIOTS at 4:00??? Practice shows that yes 2) For those who are completely fed up, watch the throw from 2:20 PS And this is a "solid" casino by online standards... -2.7% should be enough for them

Quote:

Message from Floki777 What table should you sit down to play? 1. Only online roulette. No cartoons or spins - these are flash games, an office version of Roulette 2. Choose a table where there are at least a hundred or two players online. 3. It's good if after each spin you can see the list of winnings in amounts and/or bet amounts. Based on this, don't play at maximum stakes, for example, don't bet $100 if that's the limit. Play $1 or $5, $10 per number. Don't get caught, gentlemen, it's better to play in the shadows. 4. Play rarely. Win - take your winnings, leave the game. Until tomorrow. Or return to this table in 3 days, a week. Or have a couple of tables in reserve. 5. Don't use one game strategy. We play chaotically, but according to a system - our own system, our own way, program, we gamble as best we can, but UNPREDICTABLY! 6. After a series of successful games - we deliberately lose a percentage of the bank (I don't know which one) and blow this percentage away with beer, relax, so to speak, BUT! provided that the rest of the winnings have been withdrawn from the account, otherwise you'll get drunk and blow the rest. What else can I add, any advice?

---

Comments to the point. 1. Roulette with kc guarantees that the casino won't cheat when throwing. LIVE broadcasts are far from a panacea, there is evidence that even players at the same table are shown different cartoons at the same time. 2. When the table is bombarded with chips, the casino doesn't really interfere, but it's not obvious what to bet. 3. 100%. However, if the casino decided to pile it on, you should use it to the fullest. There are such stages when, on the contrary, 100 small ones shave, and one giant gets thoughts. 4. Rarely not. We play according to the calendar We learn to feel whether there is a "game bank" and how much the casino is ready to give out. In order not to get under the locomotive of the adaptive rollout finger after another maximum, we take a break for several spins, the more you snatched - the longer the pause. Usually, for me, for an increase of 1-2k, it is enough to break for 20-30 minutes. But I still recommend squeezing out a positive wave, but wisely. Not the point. 5. It is correct to say not UNPREDICTABLE, but contrary to the obvious majority. In this regard, playing where you see the bets of others is much preferable. I will add - this is one of the main reasons for the success of ballistas like Olynes. Playing according to the principle of betting "who knows what" (as many at the same table with him would say) just provides the moment when the adaptive rollout has caught on other parts of the table. But it's worth Olynes taking the lead and it's all over. 6. Yes, the casino needs to show the dynamics of the credit "swing up". I had super days when the breakthrough in the session was x1000 from the start and as a result my account was banned.