14 - 40 Open-ended game

Bet 0.20, until you win, then the bet grows and again until you win. Reached bets of $2.5, then $5. And no three spidermen And without stop-loss, he bit the bit. That's it -$147, alas. That's Spiderman.

And how many spins did the credit last for? :blink: For bets of $5 per turn, $50-100 is not enough. The bigger the claim, the longer the period you need to capture. Another thing is to play on misers, catch rises and enlarge. Credit 100, bets 0.01-0.02- and occasionally 0.05 Credit 200, bets 0.01-0.02-0.05 and occasionally 0.10 Credit 500, bets 0.05-0.1- and occasionally 0.50 but at this level it is no longer necessary You can withdraw $500 The main problem with spiderman is the fixed number of lines. There are no multiplexers for doubling the win. You can only regulate the rate. Your description doesn't even mention the phrase about lowering the level at the next maximum of the loan, and this is an important point.

From the beginning, the pictures were either empty or with blocked jokers Lonely 2 respins with a funny result Touched $36, I thought, well, I’ll spin a little more, because Hulk is a tough slot machine in general There is a triple he immediately gave +8$ as for me for such a bonus it is dust and twisted the credit to 51.19$ Honestly, I was more disappointed 17 lines at 0.02 = 0.34$ bet, payout 51-34 = 17$ The payout coefficient x50 for the triple Hulk seems to me to be crap. But the fact of the jerk remains. It turns out that today the casino is favorable and according to Shpilevoy's logic, you can sometimes wedge serious applications for Success into the game. Stop loss $30, leverage $21, I'll go to roulette. :dry:

London Leroy

The last number to come up was 14. Missed. Not 20, not 1, but just over the side :sick: As usual :evil: I forgot about the stop loss. I played for all 50$, on average 5-7$ per spin. I guessed only 2 times. "12" at the beginning and "18" on the last cents. I caught the edge a couple of times. Despite the fact that the stakes were wide, the "fat" never played. Indicative: 0-3-21-25 lined up around 23, 26 falls (edge) I set a repeat, 23 falls even harder, 18 (missed) then 21, 29 also fell and when I had already forgotten about "23" IT falls. Not 5, not 10 but specifically 23, which was a normal center. They pass through the assigned numbers, but with a delay. Result credit 0$. What do you think?

Moment 14-50 no questions. Further questions: 1) Why did you go to London if you checked Sapphire room and it was giving? 2) The betting scheme is not clear and this is good, but you do not take into account the trends. Since when ... decided to kill 23? Why did not you move in trends? If the scoreboard shows 8 out of 10, a big series, how do you take this into account in your bets? 3) On slot machines, you accelerate the lines, why did you immediately go out on roulette by 10-20% of the credit? Notice your number 18. Bet amount 0.50 exhaust 5.40$. The initial credit is a donor, it does not need to be cut into a five-move. You glued from a small bet 5$, you can put them on the next move. No need to smear, but you should not roll up to one number either. If it did not work out - you catch it again with small ones. Moreover, progressions are not particularly needed, 2-3 close solutions again give a plus for enlargement. 4) No stop-loss is gambling addiction. You cannot SYSTEMATICLY collect and accumulate pluses, you have "YES-YES/NO-NO". 5) Thanks for the report.

Regarding the betting scheme, everything seems simple. 36 came up, dlk bets 0,1,36,33. 26 came up, this is over the edge from 0, repeats. 32 came up, this is over the edge from 0, repeats + 23 mirror. 28 falls, removed/rearranged in 8-11, 33 falls previous Moved the remaining kopeks under zero to the street 16/18, the casino took pity on it, put out 18 = win and the next bet is under zero, 1 and 20 play, and 14 falls over the edge More than enough to understand the ADAPTIVE ABNORMALITY OF WHAT IS HAPPENING. Judging by time, London has just opened. Why climb on a table that is still: a) half empty b) hasn't mowed down the dough (to give away the surplus)