How Raynor plays Martingale on odds

Raynor wrote: Since I try to approach the gameplay at least somewhat seriously, I always launch my Excel file before launching the casino. Here, in particular, is how I estimate any martingale in advance. In cell B7 (which is filled with color for convenience, and the font is set large and bold) I enter the initial amount, and the program already calculates what and how. From the first illustration it is clear that for a martingale for 5 repetitions with an initial bet of 1 cent, an amount of 31 cents is required. Recently, as a joke, I added in small print on the right the calculation "to a million", designed to show how many times it takes to make winning spins to accumulate a million. In the case of a bet of 1 cent, the total number of bets of 100 million looks a little mocking mrgreen.gif Well, that means. This is the simplest starting table. In general, I create a separate one for each style of play. That is, Betvoyager for 5 repetitions with an initial bet of 1 cent and, say, with an initial bet of 5 cents are 2 different tables. In short, I show the beginning and the end. The whole thing "from start to finish" would require about 10 screenshots. If the martin is exactly for 5 repetitions, then the transition to a bet of 0.02 can happen no earlier than after 31 winning spins, and then there is no need to wait for another 31 wins to move to 0.04, if it is possible to bet 0.03. That is, there is absolutely no need to specifically double the deposit to move to a new level. I think that everything should be relatively clear according to the table. At the top I enter the initial amount, which I calculated in that small one, cell D8 I actually keep more for beauty, because the only thing I enter manually when performing calculations is the columns "rates per day" and "rate". Everything else is calculated using pre-filled formulas. The word "day" actually needs to be replaced with something else, because in reality we are not talking about such a time fragmentation, but I have already gotten used to it. In general, it is clear that for 320 winning spins when playing in the mentioned style, the account could theoretically have 4589.25 euros. More than 125 euros on this roulette with martin for 5 repetitions cannot be made due to the upper limit of 2000. The answer to the second question follows from everything written. I do not see the point in testing anything in theory for a long time, because my playing style is built on luck and capital management. It is obvious that martin for 5 repetitions is a very risky method. That's why there was no particular point in testing it. It's like this: either you'll "slip through" or you won't. Well, I didn't slip through yesterday. But if I'd taken additional measures, i.e. created false series that I wouldn't be playing later (like in that joke: "Yesterday I really screwed the bus conductor - I paid for the ride, and then I didn't go mrgreen.gif ), then maybe I'd have grown to at least 100-200 euros, and then we'd see.

Raynor continued

---

Pro...(missed) the tournament, and with it the opportunity to cut down at least 500 euros for free, right? Awesome... Of course, this does not improve the mood, but since I promised "to tell you more about the table tomorrow", I will have to fulfill it. Maybe it is no longer relevant, but I am used to keeping all my promises. Regarding the first table, I think. everything is clear. I naively believed that absolutely every roulette player should have one by default. If suddenly not, then you can make it in a couple of minutes. Cell B7 - make the font larger (mine is 16), it is also better to make it bold and fill it with some pleasing color. I preferred gold. From A8 to C8 - these are the headings. It is also better to make them bold. A9 (move) we write 1, then in A10 we type =, then click on A9 and add "+1". Then click on A10, move the cursor to the lower right corner so that the cursor turns into a cross, then hold down the left button and drag down. The subsequent cells A11, 12, etc. will be filled with numbers, each of which is one more than the previous one. Click on B9 and write "=B7". Then in B10 write "=B9*2". Then also drag this formula down using the cross. In C9 write "=B9". Then in C10 write "=B10+C9", then also drag it down. I calculated that 16 moves for martin is more than enough, because even with an initial bet of only 1 cent on the 16th move you need to bet 327.68 euros, and the total costs will already be 655.35 euros. We figured out the first table. Why calculate something in your head every time? in a column or using a Windows calculator, I prefer to refer to it. The second table is a little more complicated. And the joke is that for each casino and even for each method (martin for 5 repetitions, martin for 10 repetitions, some other gaming methods) it is necessary to compile a separate one. Since different gaming tables differ in chip values and minimum/maximum betting limits. In general, from A9 to other cells with the number 9 are headers. What is higher (B8 and D8). numbers are already excessive. Since the table is usually filled once and for all. then you will not have to constantly enter new numbers there, as in the case of the previous one, so you can enter the initial value in B10 in normal font. A10 is the number one. Then one is added to it in A11 and stretched, as in the one described above. It says there that "Days", although in fact here we are most likely talking about just the next stage of raising the bet. It's just that initially I made a table to calculate the percentage of income per day, so the word "days" was still relevant there. In general, A10 = 1, A11 = A10 + 1, and we stretch it down. B10 is the initial amount. For a 5-repetition martin, i.e. the first bet and 4 more multiplications, 31 cents are required. (See the previous table). If all this were for a 6-repetition martin, the initial amount would be 63 cents, for 7 repetitions - 1.27, etc. B11 - B10 + C10, and then we stretch this formula down. Income per day (C10) = E10 * D10, and then we stretch it down. D10 (bets per day) is filled in manually. It does not mean "per day", but the required number of bets to reach the amount, after which it will be possible to increase the initial bet. In the first case, the amount needs to be doubled in order to bet 2 cents instead of 1 cent on 5 repetitions. This cell is used in calculations, i.e. Daily Income (cells C10 and below) is the number of bets per day multiplied by the bet amount. Next comes cell E - this is the bet amount. E 10 = 0.01. E11 = E10+0.01. Since the minimum chip in BV is 1 cent. Then it is stretched, but usually has to be adjusted later. F10 is the total number of bets. In the first case, it is equal to the value of "Bets per day", i.e. F10 = D10, and then the value of each new cycle is added. I.e. F11 = D11+F10, then the formula is stretched. Next comes the "Check" column. In G10, we write "= E10*31". After which the formula is stretched. The value of this column should be equal to or slightly less than the value of the "Initial Amount" column with the same number. Its essence is to determine the amount required for such and such an initial bet on such and such a number of repetitions using martin. Therefore, on the first and second "days" these values are absolutely the same, and then the "Initial Amount" is always slightly greater than "check". Of course, I would enter some kind of macro to avoid an error if Check is suddenly greater than the value of the initial amount. But I don't know how... The columns after "Check", which I even filled in gray for convenience and made the font bold - this is already excessive. Calculation of the total number of bets for different time periods. That is, H10 = G10 / 7, H11 = G10 / 14, etc. Further formulas, of course, are stretched. That's the kind of crap. Only the "Bets per day" columns are filled in manually and then the "bet" column is adjusted, because there after some time it is not necessary to increase each subsequent bet by only 1 cent, but there are jumps of several euros. At the same time, it is necessary to ensure that the "Initial amount" is as close as possible in value to "Check", but not less. In math lessons this was called "more or equal". Because Check is a clear reference amount required for a specific bet for a specific number of repetitions. So we move on: while there are less than 62 cents on the account, we bet 1 cent, when the total balance becomes 62 cents, we bet 2 cents until we grow to 94, after which we bet 3 cents, etc. [betvoyager is the only casino that can be trusted.] Of the ones drawn, apparently, yes. When you get mad sometimes and go all-in (it happened), then the bet sometimes even wins... But in principle, I trust Evolution and Playtech, which provide "live" dealers to various casinos, completely. And, roughly speaking, if I have a thousand bucks that I am ready to "deposit", then I would put 50-100 of them in BV, and divide the remaining 900 between Playtech and Evolution.

"That is, there is absolutely no need to specifically double the deposit to move to a new level." There is none, because there will be no doubling of the initial bet, but a more gradual increase - 0.01 - 0.02 - 0.03 (and not 0.04), etc. I seriously doubt that a martingale to a depth of 5 will withstand 200 cycles. The only thing I can advise the author to play "herringbone" - i.e. the entry points into the game are a change of color (chance) and only one next spin in the repeat is significant. If you win, then you just wait for the next color change. If you lose (there is no repeat - the color change has passed), then immediately bet again in continuation. Loss is a pure herringbone (parquet) with a height of 5 When playing on a multi-table, the adaptive will not hold a player who makes long pauses and rarely bets. The main thing is not to coincide with the tactics of other larger players.