How to Win at Casino Roulette - Players' Thoughts and Advice

Any casino has special system shootouts. And sooner or later you fall for it and lose all your money. If you want to win back, the next loss will not take long to come.
Roulette has always been more of a test of your luck than a way to earn money and improve your well-being. It is also worth considering that you are playing with a casino that really does not want you to lose its own financial resources. To prevent constant losses, the casino has a team of specialists who are always ready to stop your winnings and make you lose all your money.
You shouldn't play against professionals, you have very little chance of winning. Try to find a platform that is very common and has a lot of visitors, this may save you a little from a targeted drain of money. Refuse all bonuses. Play only with your own money and at the first feeling that you are being drained, take your winnings and leave.
When playing according to the scheme, wait for your turn more often. Do not place a bet without preliminary statistics, increase the chance of winning. And do not play alone at the table. If there are many players at the table, then your chances increase several times.
Don't go to the casino too often and try to use several strategies. Sooner or later the computer will figure you out and drain all your funds. So it's better not to play at all, and if you sit down at the table, don't waste money, but place your bets wisely.

Shpilevoy wrote: how can a distant affgambler.ru know what players are thinking )))))

Yes, a scheme is needed. But what to build it on? First, you need to understand the root of the problem. If you don't consider ballistics (and I don't consider it), then you need to somehow increase the guessing frequency. By the way, this does not mean reducing the number of spins to repeat numbers. The main thing is that these numbers of spins cluster around some value, no matter what. There should be no spread, when, for example, a number is repeated first after 20 spins, and then after 100. To reduce such a spread, you need to bet not stupidly right after the fallout, but calculate the optimal points from which to start betting.
...
I don't like big words like "grail", but ways to increase the probability of a forecast (which is what is needed) may exist. But finding such a method means not just "searching in Excel", but refining the theory of probability. It is unlikely that you have seriously studied this. Have you studied the distances to repetitions? Have you struggled with geometric distribution? If not, then you have not started looking in a real direction. This is not empty chatter, not showing off or "smart-talking", but sad realities. This is how the world works, the most difficult tasks require very difficult and non-standard approaches.
And Excel is just a convenient tool for analyzing statistics. But I don't do simulations there, for example, but create programs in JAVA. To eliminate stupid errors that you might not notice in Excel.
...
At the beginning of the last century, many learned men did not allow the creation of heavier-than-air flying machines. Airplanes, that is. And 200 years before that, they probably said the same thing about steam locomotives. And those who did not think so, got into trouble. Such is the fate of pioneers ))
...
Money can be earned. But you want a lot of it, and you can't earn that much working for someone else)) so you play roulette, and that's time, i.e. the same money... and the prospects are vague. Perhaps, completely hopeless, but it sucked me in, damn... as Yesenin said... I'm the same lost one as you, there's no way back for me )) Here's another question - how much more. And if the regular income from the game is at least the same as earnings at work - I would choose the game. But not ballistics.
...
Good incomes give you the opportunity not to think about money and not to count it. Like being free.. But freedom is not only rouletted in money, but also in the ways of earning money. When there are no bosses and envious colleagues, you don't have to ask for time off, you don't have to get up early... I want to make money, I want to rest, and the world is open. There is something to strive for, huh?
...
You know, I've taken a lot of risks in my life and embarked on all sorts of adventures, but I told myself: enough. For now, I only play on simulations. But I feel I have the strength to break this wheel. More precisely, to overcome the reasons that hinder my goals.

well yes, not everyone can understand, isn't it easier to simulate everything that will happen in 2100 days on the computer in a couple of minutes? Why play for those candy wrappers, why waste precious time, is that you in the photo? It seems you're not so young to waste time like that....
...
I can leave the casino with plus 100, plus 50, plus 20 without any effort. I can even leave with some kind of minus.
I can lose like everyone else - but I will always lose less than I can win - for the simple reason that the casino cannot win from me as much as I can.
Well, on the other hand, my line of play rejects, excludes the worst options...

You see, I have a situation where after many years spent searching for a non-existent grail in Excel, I have lost all the basic fundamentals necessary for a real plus in a real game.
and for myself now I don’t see any other way to get rid of my own stupidity than this kind of training on candy wrappers with spin-by-spin displacements.
It may seem like a waste of time from the outside, but I’m just embarrassed to even tell you what I’m losing out on.
...
I'm getting frustrated with the same situation: increasing stakes in pursuit of 2/3 and 4/6. And it's not even funny anymore...
and how many times have I promised myself not to fall for Martingale's nonsense... but I see two sixlines falling out 6 times in a row - and I start betting against it.
and if in such a situation with dozens or columns I can hold on and chase then dividing 2/3 into two 1/3 and at least I don’t lose much, then in the case of a bet on 4 streets out of 6 - I catch a real wedge and start increasing the bets in pursuit and this is fatal.

You just need to change the criteria for evaluating the game or some status - let's say status A is an ideal victory, status B is a total loss. When that status starts moving from A to B, we simply stop playing regardless of the result.
And the goal of the game itself is not the money that we can put in our pockets, but to win back as many sains as possible - to bet more money when the status moves from B to A.
If you come up with something like that, you will leave the game in different plus/minus situations and you will notice that the result fluctuates around some absolute value (here I mean if plus minus was expressed, say, in ROY)
Plus, after you stop the game, you can always watch x spins and write down the result, what would have happened if you continued the game for x spins.
From this you can draw some conclusion and make some decision that changes the exit point...
If you do this, you will soon see that you have managed to limit the amount of loss while the winnings remain unlimited....
...
the criterion for leaving the game is not the number of pluses or minuses, it should be something else. For me, it's like I hit it... If I miss every other one or two, I'll play until the end and watch everything

It's good that the chance of this is about the same as the chance of ending up on the moon tomorrow

But if I miss, I will immediately stop playing and change the game model, I will start missing again, I will change it again, but this will already mean that the casino or the dealer is making fun of me (though this hasn’t happened in 20 years

)
if you get attached to the number of chips - then here is your future - you will stop when you win and play when you lose... in reality, this is what all system players do - especially the fearful ones....