Casino stories: real life and fantasy

Crazy stories about land-based casinos from a "secret" professional from the 90s.

- The casino has 2.66 thousand dollars...
There is no need to continue watching.

- I've had zero come up 12 times in Shayba. The odds of that happening are 1 in 100 million...
The second one is the same, and it's also a pussy.

Players are:

1) "Teapots". This category abandons reason until better times, recalling their grandmother's birthday, their aunt's apartment number, their lucky number, etc. 70% of all players.

2) "Psychics" - these respected gentlemen and ladies love to listen to the voices of spirits and various otherworldly forces. After a loss, they usually exclaim: "Yes, yes, I heard it, my inner voice said that number, but for some reason I didn't bet!" This group can actually fall into a chronic, classic pattern, with the loss of personal property (although rare). However, they rarely win.

3) "Systems Philosophers" These are mostly men, sitting thoughtfully with pieces of paper, writing something. When they win, they quietly rejoice; when they lose, they look sadly at the paper, checking the numbers. Sometimes the systems philosophers win.

4) "Professionals". A roulette pro must be a good psychologist and analyst, although mathematical and acting talents are always helpful. They must have strong nerves and a steady attention span. To kill a PRO, to eliminate them from the game, the casino must deal with them personally.

I played roulette for the first time near Golden Sands, in a Bulgarian town with the beautiful feminine name of Albena. The casino was empty, cool, cocktail-style, and so prim that the players' scantily clad bodies, smoothed by the sea and sun, looked almost indecent.

I decided to play for simple odds: betting on numbers seemed like drunken hussarism. And the red and black alternated with magnificent regularity. Gently stroking a stack of five ten-dollar chips, I placed the top one on red. The dealer spun the wheel and dropped the ball. After bouncing around for a while, the ball landed on the red 18. Another chip was moved next to my chip. I collected my winnings and stepped my chip onto black. The dealer spun the wheel again, released the ball, but it bounced around and stopped on the red 5. Childishly deciding that red was enough for now, I placed two chips on black. And the black 26 landed.

Like Ostap Bender, I would have been very surprised to learn that I was playing the Martingale system. After about two hours, slowly, in small increments, betting on color, even numbers, dozens, halves, and doubling my bets when I lost, I won two hundred dollars. The ball was damned respectable; it never repeated the same color more than three times, never got stuck on a dozen or halves for long; in short, it was an exemplary example of theoretical luck.

/Galya ANNI/

Two people emerge from the casino. One is completely naked, the other is in his underwear.
“I even like you,” says the naked man, “You know your limits and know when to stop...”

Shpilevoy wrote:
...we need to check how it performs in real money casino tests, not in bare-bones generations...

Coin writes:

If the owner sets the % = 2.7, then such a roulette will almost completely correspond to those roulettes that were in the 18th century.
I dare say that current roulettes operate at a winning percentage of around 20-30%.

Alatissa writes:

As for me, Shpilevoy in his descriptions uses not a game with an adaptor,
more like a currency exchange player, only with a transfer of vision to roulette
and then... using old methods)
And in casinos with a minus mo of 20-30%

Shpilevoy wrote: Madam, where I play on the ground now there is a team of 5-6 people who are playing better and better every day.... It is very difficult for them to give up old illusions, the magic of numbers, over-insurance and stupid "calculations" of what-after-what-falls )))
But based on my example and my comments on each spin, they all GRADUALLY creep into the plus!
The stakes begin to be properly balanced.
They begin to see "b/w" and "pzh"...
They understand the overall dynamics of the loan and where to stand
They now think globally in terms of software = who to give, who to kill
They understand what the bets are and how to draw the ball.
They know what to do when they win and lose.
Focus on your BRM, not on when and where
They feel the scenarios imposed by roulette
etc.

==== roulette and the stock exchange are COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THINGS )))
The exchange was invented for "intellectual" suckers who are afraid of the word "casino".
I consider all sorts of Forex and Bitcoin to be 100 times more of a scam, with the same principles of adaptive game control.

Alatissa wrote: On earth - it's on earth.
I'm not commenting on that.
You don't have an example of a game with adaptive.
Intelligence. Scenario. Answers. Picking up on answers.
What you are describing here is called "guess (predict) the variance."

////////////////////////////////////

Not quite so.

A) THE STORY OF YESTERDAY

I come into the hall, a familiar, sad man is sitting there...
- Why are you sad?
- Four exchanges, I can’t guess a single number!
I watched his game...
- Stop!
I brought my money and we ended up with a common game bank.
- Look, now every spin you make a move of 2 chips of 50 each, and I'll make a move of 2 chips of 50 each. Bet whatever you want, however you want, and I'll either call your bets or bet on the other hand. The goal is ANY win. After that, we'll do the same thing, but every spin, 3 chips of 50 each. After a win, 4 chips, and so on. Got it?
- Yes.

.... After 40-50 minutes, we DOUBLED the initial capital, withdrew it, and split it proportionally. He happily covered his losses and was left with a profit.... Moreover, I switched to slot machines, and the guy HIMSELF played for an hour and doubled his next bet... === consciously and without any hysteria, he clearly continued his previous behavior...

"You got the baker off today!" said another acquaintance as we were leaving...

=== THIS is not a guessing game, it was a deliberate (almost daily) game of roulette.
ADAPTIV is its integral component.

////////////////////

2) ADAPTIVE = GOOD or EVIL?

The casino looks at the bets and places the ball accurately to the number. === AXIOM

The casino can't kill 100% of bets. There's software that decides when and to whom to give, and who and when to kill.
This software contains rules and templates.

It's trivial, an example of a game with adaptive === is any of my videos )))

At the algorithmic level, RMT is a whole BEHAVIORAL COMPLEX of atoms and overall, a general focus of BET TYPES, BRM, TEMPLATES, and TRENDS. It's not like I'm just picking nine numbers and churning out a geometric progression until I get there. THAT'S NOT HOW IT WORKS.
My algorithms and strategies are based on universal principles that outperform most roulette software. Of course, if some jackpot or script turns on 100% bet-rolling, then ANY game will become pointless.

For those who do not understand adaptiveness, adaptiveness is an eternal sentence.

For those who understand adaptive, adaptive is an endless source of money.