Archive of discussions on the old Casino Mining Pool website

All miners' games can be abstracted into one giant roulette game "for one hand" according to the same strategy. Despite the fact that the game is played by different people, at different rates, in different casinos and at different times - it is still one egregor. And this huge combined game will have its own giant ups and downs. The main thing is to maintain the general upward trend. * * * After a winning spin, as a rule, there is a losing one. Yes, there will be fewer attempts to guess in 100 spins, but if their effectiveness is higher than now, then it will be justified. <...> A strong reduction in the number of bets on a constant volume of spins is not good. This way you can run into 0 bets per game * * * We take three typical "swing to zero" games and decide what needs to be done (we do not touch the forecast block at all) so that the overall result is at least 0.00 of the starting credits. And that's it, the casinos are screwed! * * * to quickly get into excel you need to have a cool text editor AkelPad download and install instead of notepad. you won't regret it. copy -18 -18 -27 -36 +144 -18 -18 -27 -36 -18 -18 +72 -18 -18 -27 -36 -18 -18 -27 +108 -18 -18 -27 -36 -18 +72 -18 +72 -18 -18 -27 +108 -18 -18 -27 -36 -18 -18 -27 -36 -18 -18 -27 then press edit > replace > checkbox ESC-sequence > and write a space on (symbol end of line) then press replace and there will be a column copied everything and in excel * * * noticed that if there are a lot of empty spins, and then 3-4 bets, then the concentration of winnings is greater and fewer losses than with a small number of empty spins and many bets in a row. * * * <...> about the bet sizes. 1) Self-regulating bet - a fixed fraction (F) from the player's BR (depending on the type of bets, the probability of winning (V), the sizes of Profit (P) and Loss (L) based on the result of the move). F = ((P / L + 1) * V - 1) * L / P Since positive MO is in the roulette rules, we calculate the optimal fraction for the casino (bet on 9 numbers): In our case (for the casino!): win P = 36 - 28 = 8 loss L = 28 probability of winning V = 28/37 = 0.7568 F = ((8/28 + 1) * 0.7568 - 1) * 28/8 = 9.44% That is, with BR = 300 chips, the casino would like our bet of 28.32 = 28 chips per move. And then the positive MO will leave no chance for a stable win. <...> 3) The casino (a player with a positive MO) if it exceeds its optimal fraction more than 2 times can get crazy loss progressions with a normal V. 4) I suggest increasing the Lotus BR to 1000 chips and see what happens with the BR fraction from our side on the current bet: 9.44 * 2 = 18.88% = 19% * * * A sharp change in the polarity of bets, despite the controversial financial efficiency, is aimed at knocking down the adaptive casino. The received story from Hutorok about how in life an electrical signal is transmitted over long distances through main power lines only confirmed the correctness of the innovations. * * * Almost all games (even minus ones) have a pronounced positive move. For example: start 300 min 154 max 373 finish 154. The actual result of this order is -146 chips, but it could have been +73, and there are a lot of such orders.

(continued) Recently there was an idea that a player against an adaptive should create templates himself and then destroy them himself. The dynamics of changing radii is a change of template, unexpectedly for a casino. * * * I think that you can’t spoil them too much with analytics on candy wrappers, after honing the method, it should be applied in real life as quickly and widely as possible in terms of establishments, without going for very large wins, so as not to attract attention. You need to shake them up and get the initial bank, and then move on to more complex tasks of analyzing new realities, in any case, even now the pool’s task is to collect real histories for further leisurely analysis, identifying emerging centers, finding out the sizes of deviations and other statistics, this will be an important reserve for victories at the next stage, because any strategy is eventually revealed. You need to detect the moment of counteraction. * * * NIMB algorithms have not yet been revealed. And the point is not that casino analysts have not been able to do this over the years, but that there was no reason for the casino to believe that such an algorithm exists. The point is in the correct rotation of wins and losses in time and their size - a vertical corridor with a sinusoidal curve. * * * 1 radius with a maximum of 9 bets works best, either statically or dynamically. which, by the way, means the same thing by and large. * * * Dynamics are preferable for many reasons.

How should the adaptive be coded so that it could encrypt such complexities so smoothly and still win against players I don't think you can lay out 2-3 unprepared sequences. After a year of work (and you have even more), I have this disease "I see what I want where there is nothing". * * * as for the adaptive, going to any plus we will see such a mess. I see it every day. Because I practically never play in the minus. And you can clearly see when the adaptive starts to cycle. It's a pity that I don't have the ability to load it heavily yet. Although I can already slip out of bad situations. It is idiotic artificial chains that poison the lives of players according to systems. So far the bot is 40/60 in favor of the casino, but by limiting the game and setting a chain of winnings, even small but stable ones, we will see all sorts of miracles. I simply suggest analyzing ready-made real combinations, because if the adaptive receives templates from the player, then it MUST also respond according to the templates. It is not that highly educated yet. We are looking for templates from the adaptive. * * * I am referring to the topic when SG stops for a smoke break in search of repetitions. The row should work * * * I repeat, if all 3 numbers in a row have dropped out, it is better to exclude it, it has degenerated. The most interesting rows are those with 2 dropped out numbers * * * We have a regular RNG - without an adaptive, with processor sand, etc. If we do not get +$1000 on our machine, then it is too early to talk about casino adaptives. Only a comparison of the "+" of the standard (our RNG) and the "-" of the casino game will give a full understanding of the difference. * * * We also have an adaptive We increased the bundle to 20 top formulas. We ran them on tests. Result: long losses became shorter, but still come often. We made a full reversal of bets. That is, in theory, where there was a loss (-) there will now be (+). After a few games, the situation has again turned around to the dominance of minuses: <...> that is, the formulas have started working correctly again and the reverse places the bets past. We return to normal bets (remove the reverse), but the pool's RNG immediately throws everything past the formulas: <...> Shock. * * * Natural adaptive? We've played too much * * * 1) "Dead numbers". If you recall the FROZEN track tables for different strategy machines, it is not uncommon for 8-10 numbers to go into deep freeze and start playing from the 50-60th spin. Moreover, there are numbers that may not play for days. = You need to identify this dead cloud and save chips, excluding the "living dead" from the betting field. 2) "Put to sleep for 10 spins". It is not quite clear why after the combination is triggered we put it to sleep for exactly 10 spins? Point strategies do not have a "slide" of the trigger frequency. It can be any move of the micro-cycle. 3) Adaptive. I see a simple minus for now - the rating (top) is updated rather slowly. Therefore, if, for example, the top combination S * 1 * 1 started to work, then the adaptive easily sees that after 5 the bot ALWAYS forces 8. Of course, intervals > 1 are more difficult to track, but "1" is elementary.

---

p. 1 refers to the topic of "saving chips by subjectively excluding unreal numbers from the bet field" * * * remembering the game in 1 number, the dropped number will fall again and again, the adaptive seems to check this place. maybe the same applies to combinations? * * * but this does not mean that everything is bad! Let's remember cumulative rates... we start with 12 formulas, the one that played = is eliminated, but the next ones go by 2 chips, etc. until, for example, 5 remain. This is where the main events begin * * * the thing is that over the years the brain is sharpened for roulette and sees more and more different simple and complex "patterns". Show an experienced player one statistics board and he will poke up to 5 patterns. BUT!!! In a casino, all these things can and should be analyzed only in the context of current bets on each spin. * * * The technology of tracking patterns itself implies that the system should self-regulate - what plays goes to the top, what does not play - goes down. * * * At the moment, self-regulation is sluggish. To knock established patterns out of the TOP, a long period of play of unpopular patterns is needed. Mobility must be added. * * * I am writing here because I have not found a better place to play, it does not let me into half of the groups, as I understand it, the pool is inventing the roulette grail and has not come together for a long time. I suggest going a completely different way. 1. The pool controls the games of all miners and guesses 2-3 numbers. 2. All miners have a bot that puts these 2-3 numbers on the increase. 3. When these 2-3 numbers play, the pool guesses other 2-3 numbers, as if everyone starts to strangle some part of the field until the casino wins, it will not block it for everyone and for a long time. This is suspicious, and the bets on the increase come out on the steps of the order price. If you add up all the miners, the length will be 5 times greater than if you waited for these 2-3 numbers on one hand. It's chaotic, but I think it's clear. * * *

I'll also throw in something from my group )))) already during the tournament the idea came to use the good old anti-adaptive trick to generate series of kc not 50 spins but 5 spins such shortened series quickly catch up with the counter of played "games" without bonuses and the normal adaptive one starts to ALIGN! the reputation is turned on that BONUSES exist! //////////////// what is good about roulette? chaos is the absence of normality chaos generates collisions collisions can be short and long the sooner we solve a long collision and squeeze it out to the fullest, the more money we earn /////////////////// coners are, by meaning, a rarer collision than sixes, so first we need to analyze sixline repetitions when do they come? at what distances? what are they? how many WWW in a row is optimal to catch? how often does the game return to these numbers? if the frequent sixline is considered a hot base point of spin trajectories, then the game (adaptive, distortions......) should support this area for some of its own reasons........... "should" is a mistake ))) Coin does not like it when someone says "roulette should......" ))) ////////////////////// You have a clear trick - "move away from the table" after a significant rise in credit. This is an interesting move. Many players know how the game of roulette pumps credit up and down. A break after the rise gives a cutoff of the negative phase + moving to the end of the adaptive queue + clearing the memory of current patterns. The main problem is to synchronize so that the entry point is on a new growing wave. Here 2-3 spins become indicative. If yes, then yes. //////////////////// I took one of the last lost rng games of Stas's slot machine: History: - 22 - 13 - 25 - 30 - 32 - 22 - 2 - 35 - 20 - 6 - 31 - 19 - 26 - 9 - 11 - 21 - 0 - 35 - 8 - 15 - 16 - 23 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 26 - 20 - 24 - 0 - 20 - 25 - 27 - 31 - 35 - 19 - 1 We draw the geometry of spins (22-13 and further) and +++ complete win: L3 R4 R1U3 R1D1 L3D1 L7U1 L1 L5 L5U1 L3D3 L4 +++ R2U1 L7U1 R1D1 +++ R3U1 zerro R5D1 R3 +++ R2U1 R1D3 R2U1 +++ +++ pure core R1D1 +++ U1 U1 +++ D1 +++ L2 R1U1 +++ zerro L1D1 +++ R2D1 +++ U2 +++ R2D2 +++ R1U1 +++ L5D1 L6 Impressive, but also a collision 23-25-26-27-26-20-24-(0)-20-25-27-31-35 however. /// ... the horizontal direction of the shift must match and the length must be +/- 1 LCD 5-5-2-5-1-12-5-6-6-1-1-2-4-4-10-2-1 (1) LCD 18-2-3-8-0-2-3-0-4-3-7-0-4 (2) LCD 5-5-2-5-1-12-5-6-6-1-1-2-4-4-10-2-1 it is immediately clear that the number of wins in the second case is greater, but the truth is that the height of the expectation teeth is slightly greater (if the first tooth 18 in the first approach is not considered as outside the rules) //////////////////////////// on the topic of Stas's three and Shpilevoy's knight. The combination of systems turns out to be quite successful. Those same collision repetitions are broken through by a complete, and distributed generation is passed by a three. This is also a topic for experiment. /////////////////// there are two approaches to any roulette strategy (Coin's words) "ON-TREND and COUNTERBALANCE you should always play ON-TREND for example if you come across a collision develop it to the limit if zero-spiel fell out 5 times in a row bet it and 6, and 7, and 8 while the winnings are coming, no matter how incredible it seems." ////////////////////// you need to make a decision on the length of the jump options a) long - into short b) equal to the previous c) short - long d) long - into long e) short - into short //////////////////////// "The casino lowers the player's individual pay-outs to zero (maximum activation of the adaptive) and a double clamp situation arises - the more the adaptive rages, the faster the winnings come to the player." now it dawned on me why you need to randomize the track before starting a new game cool ///////////////////////////// Don't forget about the balance of repetitions. If a player's bets are constantly jumping around the field and the casino sees this, then the scoreboard will be filled with repetitions of your previous numbers. /////////////////////// And if a player plays repetitions, then the casino, on the contrary, will bypass them and open new numbers?

from the correspondence with greeney in rush & cash you grabbed 1st place what advice will you give on playing this slot? surprised) so I'll tell you honestly - I have no idea what's wrong with it. I don't really hang out on forums much now - there's a lot of games and work. and regarding the tournaments, you and your team were lucky there, because in that tournament where I was fifth on the wheel of fortune there was a glitch. due to which in the last 2 minutes not a single rebuy was counted for me... as a result I just ended up either in 5th or 6th place, idk... I argued with them for a long time, they returned it, bastards, at least for the rebuys the money. They are also very slow in this regard, although the technical error was fully confirmed by the management: We would like to inform you that the technical bug happened on the Monte Carlo 360 Degrees of Luck tournament on April 15th. Your purchasing of chips in the last 2 minutes did not calculate into the tournament results. That is why you see 57875 chips as your tournament result. You finished the game with 31875 chips and made 13 purchases. And about that slot... well, what the hell, just squeeze out the result on doublings and that's it + only maxbet. I don't see any other options. So go for it - let's fight. For advice I will be glad to see more normal tours in bourgeois casino) I am also interested in 1) x4 breakthroughs for about 50-60 attempts I have never fired 3+ in a row only successful pairs ////////////// I kept remembering Humax with his 15 x2 in a row on some slot :men: 2) we have noticed that BV slots give well in two waves a) on the first 100-150 spins b) then with a loss of -70% -80% of the initial credit, and here solid combinations can come, throwing out the credit not just to the start of BR, but much higher 3) attempts to break through more than +20 thousand. result are not given at all? 1) the probability of breaking through 3 times by x4 is 1 time out of 64. So it turned out normal that such a crap came out of 50-60 attempts. 2) well, to hit 15 times by 2, these are of course other probabilities. Well, you have to play a lot there, of course, this is about 1 time out of 32500. I also hit up to 19 times in total in a tournament in Twist a long time ago. But this is pure luck, of course... 3) about the waves, it is illogical. simple cheating, since it doesn't matter, because it is a tournament. Moreover, the slot gives with no edge, which means that there is no MO from above in favor of the casino and the slot is completely zero. I don't think that any kind of tricks in this regard are possible at all. About several hundred tests could show all this only. 4) 20,000 is the maximum for this slot to break through, when I broke through 16,000 I was even upset about this, that I just wasted an extra probability, since it only gave out 20,000 for a win... dum-dum, motherfucker... ((( p.s. the maximum I got for the whole game was 4,000 only on the lines.

.......and it puzzled me, it turns out that for 1-2 place you need to at least go over 100-150 thousand in 2 hours. serious production ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 100/2=+50 per hour = +10t every 10 minutes there are 10t chips, max. placement 1t. It is not realistic to guess every spin, this is clear, it means you need to place it so that it is x4 from the current bet, then we maintain LLW per minute 3 spins if 30% WIN proportion is maintained, then the credit grows according to plan if not, then you need to narrow the bets by as many times as we are behind schedule ...... in short, you need to think /// ... the number will be hot + also for it to play endlessly = nonsense to catch 1 repetition before 2 more repetitions? I don’t know, sometimes it will work, but not in the case of the WEB, on the other hand, those who broke through to 30-40 thousand, they weren’t very smart, like Diavol, who put a complete 2 on the machine and left, and 50,000 poured in there )))))) /////////////////////////////// in addition, he also drowned 50 euros in a regular roulette, psychosis, 2 moves, or 200+ or 0, it turned out to be 0, sad ////////////////////////////////// and this is also /for your information, very sensible/ Why should I call them here? So that they will accuse me of botting and not pay a tidy sum? ////////////////////////