Reading casino roulette number generation

Let me start by saying that I have been interested in this question for a long time, but there is no information on it anywhere, except for fragments of Boris’s phrases in his videos.

The topic touches upon
- Live broadcasts Evoltion...and company
- Drawings with and without KCH Profit...etc

Some players claim that the generation itself is subject to logic, mathematics, bit depth and all other abstruse terms, but I am interested in the very principle of the correct perception of this entire digital sequence - reading the generation.
The second statement says - on a multi-table you can't be rolled out because there are from 100 to 3000 people playing at the 1st table and that you and your pennies were rolled out - this is all a myth, you are simply either a gambling addict or don't know how to play....the truth is buried somewhere here but it's not certain

Background.
The RNG itself (for starters) is a mechanism that creates generations of numbers while being in an absolute vacuum for which there is no roulette, no track, no ball, no wheel - only numbers, that is, in an airless space that is not influenced by anything from the outside, hence the conclusion - the generation itself is subject to a certain reading, decoding... guessing of numbers, if you like...

BUT! as soon as the mathematical vacuum of the RNG meets the real world, physics, gravity, adaptivity and Pedal Vasya, as a result on our screens we can notice that the number we are waiting for comes:
- in the room (the stars are on your side, buddy)
- from the obvious over the side (not this time, buddy)
- through 2 sides from complete
- previous bold
- with a boost from 2L to 4L (for those who have enough money/patience)
- and so on

Several questions arise:
1. Why over the side? - Could it be that the physical world (or maybe it's not about physics and gravity?) introduced its own error and the ball fell a little to the side?
2. Where did the concept of “finishing off the pressure on the center” come from? Moreover, for this event “finishing off” I want to hear a logical explanation or proof of your correctness and analysis.
3. Previous bold is not really previous and is it just our error in reading the generation? Here I would like to clarify that this issue is very subtle and I have found myself in situations where
a) I had to press my fat number that came through the spin
b) the number comes immediately

Conclusion and thoughts
For someone who can read the generation correctly, there is no table of the field track - only numbers, and this person plays and places bets based on the correct logical mathematical explanation of the RNG sequence flow itself, and I am not saying that you need to play only like this, not at all - but this is the basis, the core, so to speak, which gives you a very big head start.

Let's figure out how to read generation correctly and competently.

Example number 1
In this example I have abandoned all physical trends of the field and track.
The picture shows everything in detail and even schematically shows the growth and decline of the bit depth.

Game entry point 22-11-4
My calculation after 6 → 26 neighbor, 0 came up

Thinking out loud
19-19-22 f9 by three 11-4 f1 by 2, 6-0-36 f6 by three, one of them broadside as well as 19-19-22

Let's gooooooo...

Why should such players read generation?



They don't care what's falling, the wave of the dispa is smooth, it swings slightly up and down, the credit is slowly melting. You can often withdraw +10%, but also often lose the entire credit like in a swamp.

OVER THE BOARD

Let's remember that b/w is a normal phenomenon.

If I put 4 different numbers on the track, then b/w for them it is 8 numbers.
21% of all throws will be over the side! This is one situation when the ball normally falls a little to the side.

And the other is when you keep a narrow sector, and the steering wheel shows you black and white very often.
Well, let's say we're holding 27-6-34, this sector has 2 numbers b/w. The norm is 5.4% of such throws. And on one scoreboard they show you 13...17....13.......25.....13 and what's more, when it's a live ball, it either falls to you but is pushed out, or comes off who knows where but rolls to the end and b/w gets stuck. These are definitely adaptive throws.


WAITING FOR THE END

It was in Boris's books. When 27-27-27-27 in a row on the screen, it's super, but it's rare. Much more often you can catch a situation of diluted repetitions. Note xx-27-x-27-xxxx-27-27-xxx-27
It turns out that we are catching the same event, but in a smeared state there will be more situations in our favor4.
How much more pressing should I do?
It depends on what and how costly or effective it is.

PREV.BOLD

The player forces the casino to do something in response with his bets. You put a complete 23 and press it 1-2-3-4-5 spins, and the ball is in a big series. As soon as you move the bets, bam, your 23 plays! And here according to the principle "since it's not a f@ck", but when you have this all evening? No matter how little you hold, no matter how long, it's worth moving and the previous fat one is right there.

MULTITABLES

Recently this was discussed. Hundreds of people play, half of them are martin red/black, another half are 2 dozen or 2 columns. 25% of advanced people remain. 80% of them are static favorite sectors and numbers.
Of the remaining 20%, 80% is hot or cold, but dynamic.
It turns out that you synchronize with someone, anyway. But you don't know in what capacity your group is now - donors or winners, how much you bet or how little. What decision does the casino make for the current period of the game to your group.
Shpilevoy has spoken many times about playing by the trend. You need to choose for the game not WANT but SEE. If the key strategy is chosen correctly, the credit will grow. When the game is not going well, you need to change tactics and, accordingly, switch to another team. It seems to me that there are periods when the casino cheats everyone, then there is a meat grinder. If you stick to any single-type strategy, then you need one that always puts in the minority. Go against the crowd at the table.

This is always the best option! Play as no one else does. But in multi-tables you need to watch what the roulette is throwing. So it is clear where the static high rollers are sitting and you shouldn't go there. It is better to play more actively on the borders of such areas. They are easily visible on the scoreboard, these are adaptive b/w for impact betting zones.

Cosmic wrote:
The second statement says - on a multi-table you can't be rolled out because there are from 100 to 3000 people playing at the 1st table and that you and your pennies were rolled out - this is all a myth, you are simply either a gambling addict or don't know how to play....the truth is buried somewhere here but it's not certain

Let's gooooo...

I suggest thinking about it from a different angle -
"When Adam plowed and Eve spun, who was the nobleman?"

Live tables appeared relatively recently, when it became technically possible to do broadcasts and clients had affordable mobile devices.
For example, Evolution created a studio and launched the first multi-tables. There were few players, almost like in a regular earthly casino. The software creators did everything exactly like on earth to control the game. Making the game interesting, luring and killing in a common inclined corridor is their strategy. Moreover, there is strict control and accounting of each person individually. This is not an impersonal table, where handfuls of chips fall from the sky. A multi-table is 2000 individual games collected in one bunch under computer control.

Over time, the number of players increased, now it reaches 2000 at one table during rush hour. Everyone thinks that they are not noticeable against the general background. But the creators of the adaptive do not think so. Over the years, they have adapted their algorithms to the mass, but nevertheless, they have an individual scenario for each person. The system weighs the overall best result for the casino, but simultaneously leads everyone. Roughly speaking, your evening is planned as a chain of 30 events. Sometimes there will be a gap between the links for several unforeseen steps, but in the end you will be brought to the planned finale.

How to win consistently?
You need to weave - cut off negative scenarios, use general and personal enticements (provocations to raise the stakes), evade the close attention of the system, stretch out the gaps (when it is clearly more profitable for the system to deal with someone else) and take advantage of these moments.

Cosmic wrote:
Let's figure out how to read generation correctly and competently.

Example number 1
In this example I have abandoned all physical trends of the field and track.
The picture shows everything and even schematically shows the growth and decline of the bit depth.

Bit depths, orders, sums, derivatives, finals - all this is MAGIC OF NUMBERS and an illusion itself. Reading generation is somehow calculating the next number?

As it was on the old CMP. We'll stick slightly different labels on the wheel and field




The board showed banana-blueberry-orange-strawberry. What are you going to bet?

I will note that the distances will be only for real roulette. In all the others, the sequence is made by the computer and things like combinations, templates, hot, cold, frequency of occurrence, statistical analysis are suitable according to logic.

Cosmic creates its own game map - a numerical one. For example, for drawn roulettes it is no worse than bets on the track. It is the wheel that is drawn for the player, but in reality there is no "physics" of the falling ball in it and the cartoon is pulled to the number chosen by the computer. In the drawings we use bets on the track exclusively as another coordinate system so that our attacks acquire volume and variability.

In this case, banana-banana is not an option. There is a number series and MAGIC OF NUMBERS. Finals, symmetries, shifts.