Questions on the lesson "Collisions of Spins"

16-11*-29-27*-27*-11*-12*-24*-24*-32 16 . 11 . 29 . while there is confusion on the field and on the track\ 27 we bet of course the 26/30 coner with a credit of $990, it’s not a sin $10-$20 27+ (+100) rebet 11 miss (-20) total +80 there is WE DON’T BET ON THE TRACK YET because 11-x-27-27-11 this piece is already poured 12 I don't know asks for 11, but it hasn't cooled down yet (very close) we easily put a complete 12 on 10-20 chips 24 past rebet 24 past we load 24 around the field and track at 50-100 although it is obvious that 24 is the third time well no way 32 bastard!!!! mirror from 23 (we remember the dirty trick) /////////////////////////////////////////// 14-24*-32-6-17-26-26-36-25-32 rebet 14 through the sides on the track because There is nothing better yet (24-32-14) rebet 24+++ repeat but weaker arrangement what if there is a collision 32 miss further poor 24 no point where to? 14-24-32 I don't know a couple of numbers for luck 6 miss 17 miss (we'll remember two Orpheus) 26 I would have guessed 26 repeat of the pin ++ (two pins hurray) 36 miss 25 miss (shifts a little, 6-17-25) 14-29-20*-6-11*-4-4-23*-16-6 14 29 20 6 11 4 4 23 16 6 here the credit would have sagged 6-11-4-4 I would have guessed 4-4 the first edge, the second normally and I would have scrolled the rest on different weak bets, because the distances are wide the credit sags = the bets become more aggressive these are not the same 5 chips at the beginning 2-34*-12*-8*-10*-23*-10*-23*-25-8* 2 past 34 past (oh again it shifts a little along the track) 12 past 8 past 10++ vice on the field / rebet 8-10 we connect the track 23++ bitch the field didn't play IT SHIFT A LITTLE from 10 and 8 = rebet + track 10 +++ rebet (I don't know if I would lower it, because the sagging credit at this point suggests that there hasn't been a "right wave" for this style for a long time) 23+++ here again from the credit 8-10-23-10-23 this is already super /// ... and I clearly put in 1-2 numbers without backups, etc. a couple of clues and everything is fine. /////////////// this is a kind of change of strategy ////////////////////////////////// I described my behavior when playing "in repetitions" but you also need to have a strategy for sweeping shifting throws..... YIN-YANG if you work with one thing, then when the game flows into the opposite it will kill you you need to look at what is more in this style and play when I can't understand at all I play Geometer different patterns on the track

11 past (-20) total +80 there is WE DON'T BET ON THE TRACK YET because 11-x-27-27-11 this piece has already been poured 12 I don't know asks for 11, but it hasn't cooled down yet (very close)

of course these are emanations of reason I recently received in different casinos*!) crazy collisions on the first 10 spins as soon as I entered, this is what prevented me from starting "STRONGLY IMMEDIATELY" if they had come in half an hour or an hour I would have fucked them up with dignity but as it is... I fucked up

I just caught myself thinking that I wrote you one thread, but the head works multi-threaded + bunnies + mirrors + collisions on the board + all sorts of templates, accordingly, the bets are more voluminous and losses in one are compensated by wins in something else, when wins become more frequent, the patterns narrow and the bets are concentrated, it is dangerous to greatly inflate the bets, therefore, from all the multi-threaded, the head chooses 1-2 branches per game, but can change them to others (the rest look virtual) /////////////////////////// wow, all these processes are going on in a teapot ))))))))))))

Got it a little, need to read it more than once to rethink and draw conclusions. Thank you. And let's say how to act in such a situation - this is an example of a squeezed out collision from the lesson of the respected Coin: Fell 11-32-25 - and again 11. Question: How to raise x10 or more on the next spins? Or wait for a lesson on this topic?

"it's dangerous to inflate the stakes too much" Meaning don't fill half the field. I agree.

Jupiter wrote: I understood a little, I need to read it more than once to rethink and draw conclusions. Thank you. And let's say how to act in such a situation - this is an example of a squeezed out collision from the lesson of the respected Coin:

Fell 11-32-25 - and again 11. Question: How to raise x10 or more on the next spins? Or wait for a lesson on this topic?

When the game is squeezed out in a collision, you really need to feel how strong and long it is. In this case, a wonderful example is presented It is necessary to understand the global channel of the developing collision and how exactly it is implemented within this channel. Spread across many numbers or concentrated lay backs. If the super-collision is a priority of expectation, of course the player will believe in it and powerfully continue to bet without spreading the rates, at least up to 2L. 11 32 25 11 ++ 11 ++ 32+ 11+++ 26+ 23+ 23++ It is the reality of such situations that will be felt by experience and distances. Any covers on the field will not help - it is better to put this money in the selected number and not regret when the insurance would have played. After all, in such constrictions there really are rapid rises of credit to the level of x10 and x50. In this situation, it would be appropriate to insure the acceleration of a small series and throw additional chips in the MS. With this approach, we perceive it as an autonomous part of the bet, which also suits a direct repeat. If we put a couple of chips in number 10, then with a repeat of 11 it would already be perceived as a loss, i.e. we stole part of the winnings from 11. * * * Examples Here it is appropriate to throw Orpheus on top, since it is his collision shell, and the fact that the loss has narrowed so much is a gift of fate. We bet exactly in the repeats + the series on top is sealed. In case of a shift from the number, the series at least returns the bets. Here everything goes within the framework of zero-spire. We bet exactly in the repeats + the series on top. * * * It is in such situations that tilt occurs, when such a development of events seems quite real to a person and he throws almost 50% of the credit into the attack. Three-way zone with a rapid increase in bets. In case of successful synchronization, the win is specific. If you delay the repetitions, then half of the profit will be lost. This is one of the main problems of players like Shpilevoy. He catches the situation, is not afraid, squeezes it out to the maximum, but the belief in a super long and unrealistic continuation ruins most of the growth. Perhaps this is such a manifestation of excitement, when a rebet is choked at a run and it seems that the faster you bet, the longer the collision will last Most likely, this is why he now plays 4 W and exit the cycle, and not stupidly up to 2L