Roulette has only 9 numbers (Pythagorean finals)

This arrangement is called Pythagorean finals! Pure practice, I started building the matrix with it 4 years ago.
If you create a scenario with special losses of 4 numbers, then in the end you can raise good results up to x100 in three finals, although I can’t repeat this in real life yet due to financial fears)))

))) I got it. There are some ideas that I'm testing lying on the beach with 369, the results are not bad. According to the tests, so far I've gone from 1000 to 10000 for about 100 spins. But this is on paper, so far there are bets on 9, 2 and 1. I'm still working on the rest, when there are all 9, I think 100 is not far off)))

As a result, the field is divided into 4 squares 3x3 - 9 numbers and the strategy is built on 4 finals that do not have a bet plus Zero at will. The bet is kept for 5 rebets and then changes, I recommend keeping no more than three finals in the void so that the adaptor does not have other attack options. I have 4 finals mixosval in a strategy with 4 dozens: 3 standard and 4 dozen prime numbers - 1,2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23,29,31 ...

I'm still working on the bets - 3 pif finals and attack 5 spins, 0 always covers. I'm trying to think of something to play without progressions, progressions = loss long run

the essence of the game in the steering wheel = TO TELL NUMBERS
the higher the guessing percentage, the better and more profitable

when numbers are not guessed ))) the player increases his bets and sacrifices profitability
% increases, but earnings decrease

to increase earnings, the player connects progressions
but it is dangerous in the long run, because the Mariana Trench, which there is not enough money to progress, will kill the credit

////////////////////////
from this moment the MANEUVERS begin )))))
a balance of width and depth is needed so that the SESSION goes smoothly and increases the initial money

each strategy has its own optimal bank
to achieve your goals in 8 out of 10 sessions

if this does not happen, then the strategy is based on the wrong foundation = there is not enough %, frequency of guesses, betting pressure...

////////////////////////////
as for "Pythagorean finals" = this is NOT an OBVIOUS grouping of numbers, no better or worse than ANY cone or other block of 4 numbers (even 1-2-3-4)

but what to do with it and how to play it....all the same as with a hot coner
so don't get hung up on "THE MAGIC OF PYTHAGORIAN FINALS" but take any 4 numbers and think about it
a) how to choose them better ACCORDING TO THE TREND
b) what to do with them in terms of BRM and insurance
c) how to take into account the logic of adaptive responses

I agree with Shpilev completely, his recommendations made my work more interesting and even despite the fact that in 2018-2019 I spent 4k+ real American bucks on Crystal, I created a matrix that allows:
1. Check the Honesty of the CC at any casino.
2. Predict the appearance of specific numbers in a specific spin, having a certain mathematical priority
Loss, Forward or Win.