How I ruined the reputation of AVRO casino)

and this is the very same piece from the book that I am writing now)))) he blew up the AVRO casino and those slackers' asses.... this is VERY GOOD /our cause is just = we will win/

..... I read it again, and my mood even improved :silly:

although Nema carefully deleted everything on the global network, the cache managed to pull out our cornerstone "nothing is deleted forever" ))))) ///////////////////////// Nema decided to show off..... to tell that I don't understand a damn thing about offline slots transferred to online etc. etc. I just answered her questions = ok, Everum would be offended (although this is just a tacked-on comment, since the topic is "ticks in casinos")..... but why did Avro decide to slam the doors?????

That statement about the "giving" script, I will call excessively bold... slots as "artillery" of any casino are set up for serious "firing lines" - large players playing on maxbets for "slaughter". I watched the recent stream of beard carefully specifically, they poured in 7K not rubles easily, without even trying to somehow transform the strategy..., clearly showed who "gives" how much and for what, i.e. takes away at all... Licensed software has the main and undeniable advantage that will always remain the main and undeniable, namely, casino employees do not know the internal workings of the software and will never find out... They are only aware of the end result... What does this mean for a pro? - the most important thing is to stay within the framework of "random" luck after a big win, and it does not matter how many such wins there will be during the period. It is important to follow the casino rule: CashWin < 3 x VolBet.

As an outsider, I'll tell you what I see based on the dialogue and deleted screenshots. There's a very fine line between indirect and direct evidence of a "crime". The participants in the dialogue simply don't feel it. In simple terms, as an example: direct evidence is when a witness saw (filmed) the process of committing a crime; indirect evidence is when he only heard a threat to commit it, nothing more. Avro hid their true reason for leaving, but indirectly blamed Shpilevoy for it, supposedly the words of a respected person on the forum threaten their reputation. But in fact, this is a far-fetched, even indirect, accusation: they saw the words: forged... manage mathematics... etc. and for some reason decided that viewers (readers) would directly connect them with Avro. The alternative reason: "they looked at the return and made a decision PROFITABLE/NOT PROFITABLE, when there is no traffic and normal depositors = there is no point in them wasting time and money", which Shpilevoy suggested, was not accepted by the admin and moderators. And the team perceived the person who has only an indirect relation to their departure (and maybe has nothing at all) as the direct culprit and arranged a trial in the style of the Middle Ages.

Looks like Avro is really a pain in the ass