The Matrix by Kim Lee - development from Edwerk

Eduard offers his new take on the Kim Lee matrix.

Why is Zero (37) not taken into account? In the algorithm, it exists as sector 37 (mathematically). The fact that Zero's activity is five times less than that of the most active number does not mean that it should be excluded from the matrix. The idea is interesting, it is not clear by what criterion the sectors were assigned numbers, if 5 or 7 by the dominant criterion, perhaps? I will note an interesting point: in my practice, there were spins that completely coincided with the diagonals. There were also so-called 7s - 19,17,36,36,24,9,35 ... For pure mathematics - "there is nothing military here" ()Shpilevoy), but the matrix is working, where there is no adaptive. Therefore, there are idle waiting periods as compensation for the combat activity of the adaptive.

...Kimo Lee's pentagram

This is not a pentagram, but an exigram (a pentagram is a figure obtained by connecting the vertices of a regular pentagon through one, pente is five in Greek, gram is a line, and here you can clearly see a hexagon ) ... but it does not matter Most likely, the adaptors of many casinos already know this table of distribution of numbers according to the Kimo Lee matrix, because they play according to this strategy (classic), and it is discussed on the Internet. Moreover, everything is in sight: the number of entry point expectations, and the depth of the progression, etc., then it will not be particularly difficult to calculate what numbers the player expects, how much he is ready to pump into the depth, and that zero is also a weak point. (not the first, then the Nth time) Here you can play a little in the classic track coordinate system, and then run a random, and completely different numbers will be in these six "stars" and sectors. But here again, the weak number will be the one that takes the place of zero) (Randomizing the coordinate system is not my idea, it's Koina's) You can come up with something else you will get such an anti-adaptive set of roulettes. For example, why exactly a regular hexagon? In geometry, both regular and irregular figures have the right to exist. Let one side be a little longer and include zero (7 numbers) Zero should also enter the game from time to time. Why exactly a hexagon? You can draw an epigram (a heptagon), both regular and irregular) and deal with five sets of numbers. You can draw any polygon at your discretion. Each player is his own creator)

A small clarification to the previous post In Greek, six sounds like exi, seven - like epta. Official figures take their name from ancient Greek. A figure with six angles is a hexagram, with seven - a heptagram. And if you come up with your own figure, then the name for it will be unique, as the creator himself wishes)

It's not that simple! Just today I caught the 19-29 combination not by mathematics, but by the adaptive response in a certain rhythm of the game when numbers periodically fall out that are different from each other by 10 plus or minus... and this does not fit into the table since 31-21 is a completely different story, but I was guided in choosing the bet by this frequency... but the center began with 25-19, the activity of the combination is 6, just as if you make 19 the center, then 19-29, the activity of the combination is 5, but in the triple 25-19-29 - for 5016 spins it plays for the first time. And this is a pure adaptive response! The opposition reached its maximum in this spin, so I played the fun mode, but 29 filled the maximum bet - 21600 collected ... obvious distortions: 25,21,31,5,19,15,21,26,15,27,4,13,22,22,35,35,1,37,32,37,5,13,25,19,29 ... 37 - ZERO. In reality, such a cycle is not suitable for playing in plus !!!, this is an exception that only confirms the rule. At the moment, I only observe the responses, there is not enough information to make forecasts explainable from the point of view of the algorithm.

I was thinking about the idea suggested by Alatissa. What if we build a figure based on conceptual connections? Let them be geometrically free, but the checksums can coincide at the points of involvement and project a certain route? It might work, I'm not a mathematician, so I can only suggest an idea. It's hard for me to find a formula that analyzes 5-s of Pythagorean finals, I've been trying to somehow collect them into groups for a week now...