Adaptives in different casinos - reviews.

I play short series of CC in BV (for 15-20 spins) until the first major solution and then I interrupt and see what happens next if series with strong collisions begin they usually go several in a row //////////////////////////////// as for the hints after the abortion I noticed that the very next number can become the beginning of a new series but I didn't track how often this happens

From time to time I try to cause collisions in BV on the demo games. I take a series of 10 spins - and in these spins I throw 5 small chips per spin in different positions, and if 11 comes up, I don't bet on 22 and 33 - since I used to bet on these numbers before. As I understand it, I do the so-called "randomization" of spins in order to confuse the adaptive. Since I always used to bet on 22 and 33 after 11 before, and here I don't, I think that the adaptive should be a little puzzled by this fact. And then - I hope - in the next series it will throw out this combination again to test me. But this adaptive gave me the maximum in the following series: - small 7 spins in a row - one collision like ABCBA, a couple of collisions A-B-B-A. There are no obvious spin imbalances, there is no such thing on the board as: 23-23-32-23-x-32-23. It seems to me that it is hardly possible to get such generation in BV. But collisions by series or by track sectors it gives Yes, as I try to squeeze out collisions: 1. As Coin taught in the book - three markers, and then I expand the field, and then, after the end of the spin series - rebet all the following series. 2 Or 5-6 chips on streets and cones - and rebet them two series in a row. Maybe I'm doing something wrong? Maybe collisions do not come immediately and after 4-5 series? After all, BV's adaptive is much stricter than Profit's.

Standard BV generations are short accelerations of sectors and their rotation. It goes along the field and track in parallel: Moreover, the situation of direct repetitions in a short period must be justified - either the player held them for too long before that, or there are few "free" sectors left, so overlaps automatically occur.

Standard collision squeezing should lead to such generations I haven't noted 16-16-16 yet.

The adaptive scenario here is simple - to accelerate two sectors of the wheel with further transfer of the game to other areas. For these 20 spins 2/3 of the track is dead. Also, you should pay attention to the interwoven sector 36-17-4-21-34-25. The scenario may be different. My favorite is "tango", when there are returns after 2-3 spins. And you need to take into account the trend of returning to neighbors or previously shown numbers.

Coin wrote: Standard collision squeezing should lead to such generations

I haven't noted 16-16-16 yet.

That's certainly true...31-16-10 - 8 - 2 - 31- 6-10, 8-3-32-3-32-11-3 How to get that? What to squeeze with? However....