Let's look at practical examples

1. As for the game "according to Shpilevoy": ( 8 )-8-23-23-32-14-32-8 on this piece, Shpilevoy would have already made x3 minimum. Most likely it would have been x5. Therefore, it is pointless to talk further about the bets themselves. 2. Important! The provided video is full of freeze frames and gurgling sound. Many programs that write video DO NOT record to a file when there are broken and incomplete frames in the video stream. This is exactly what we are seeing. In this case, 100% video editing was going on from the casino server. NEVER PLAY LIV IF THERE IS NO SMOOTH VIDEO AND SOUND!!! NEVER PLAY LIV IF THEIR SCREEN TURNS OFF DURING THE SPIN!!! NEVER PLAY LIVE IF THE DEALER DOESN'T TALK TO YOU ON AIR!!! * * * Who doesn't believe that this was a rigged online cartoon? Watch 7:54 - 8:06 there were no technical stops in the recording, but there was a ROUGH CUT! The ball was previously lying on the wheel in number 24, and the spin begins with the dealer CRAWLING UNDER THE TABLE and picking the ball up FROM THE FLOOR!!!

The player must control the game conditions. If something is not to your liking, there is no need to drag it out and check it on your wallet.

As I understand it, this is BetFair, London table. Positioned as one of the best. And they allow themselves to do this? Do they really want to do such a thing to sink a player with $30?

Production is on a conveyor belt. It was not for nothing that I long ago recommended starting a calendar and marking successful and unsuccessful days for each casino. The picture will be clear - everyone has a plan-schedule for collecting money.

For the situation "WAS GROWTH, THE GAME DID NOT WORK, WE RETURNED TO OUR OWN" we need to take the following scenario: 1) Do not hold out until we return to our own completely. If there was growth and then a decline - let a certain % of the profit seen stick to the player (this will be a small compensation for lost time). 2) The decline runs into a certain credit checkpoint, not only do we calmly record the loss of profit (at this point we actually lost only time) - we need to cut off long losses and completely reboot the combination. There should be no shots at 1/4 or 1/2 of the credit. 3) The issue of changing the working strategy for suppressing the casino adaptive should be resolved. 4) If the session is designed for 500 spins and the return to your own occurred far after its middle - there is no need to torment the player and actually try to do the same thing, only 2 times faster Thanks to p.1, you can calmly finish the current session. It is quite possible that the player will prefer to take a break and calmly take the next order. Usual scenario Start - wave growth - descent to the start BR with a small plus - stop Bonus scenario Start - wave growth - compaction of winnings (no deep drawdown) - tangible profit - moved up the stop-loss bars, etc. Super bonus scenario When bonus scenarios are compacted. PS Scaling DURING THE GAME is a dangerous tool. Profit is pumped up faster, but also lost faster.

Let me emphasize once again. If we consider together the initial credit and the profit earned as a TOTAL working leverage that can withstand deeper cold waves, then we inevitably return to the situation when at the moment "with our own" we will bet much more than at the very beginning of the session. Why then do we not do this right at the start?