Maxim's thoughts

the simplest thing is to really scroll through any combinations in MEGA COMBO, you can watch it with your neighbors at the same time, but IPM won't be enough for this pleasure

Looks like me two years ago) I was also looking for numbers that are friends)

You can first check your combinations on MEGA-COMBO.. The calculator was developed for this. He still has a lot to read about (and, of course, analyze). And I like his desire to find something of his own in the game.

Here is my opinion. Maxim's brain simply notices specific combinations and point-blank ignores others (hides them from attention). Take any of his patterns and come up with any other. Go to the scoreboard and watch - you will see that they fall equally often. It seems like someone has already suggested looking for such pairs. I don't see any prospects in this idea. As Max himself notes, the adaptive will turn on, understand which numbers you force after which ones and will stop showing them (this is if you ALWAYS catch these patterns - and this is exactly what you are suggesting to us). It will look like a stupid game of repetitions, only not numbers, but pairs. For the adaptive, this is bread and butter. My advice to you is to study the adaptive reaction (we have lessons on the site, start with them). It is he who tilts the classical probability of numbers falling out, thereby providing his additional (not counting -2.7 at a distance from payments) advantage over the player. That's the whole point, that the player himself can use this additional advantage, but in his favor, covering -2.7 and going into profit in the long run.

InquisitorEA writes

the adaptive will turn on, it will understand which numbers you force after which ones and will stop showing them

...but it's worth switching to another strategy and not deviating from it - it will pour in these held-back connections, as if from a cornucopia.

We have no other strategy. Maxim suggests simply placing numbers in these rows. There is no advantage in this. The very assumption that some numbers appear more often than others in a long period after certain numbers suggests that these numbers simply appear more often than others. This is how Max's idea sounds, without any complications. Look at this series of patterns - the first and last numbers. They do not repeat. Among the first, there are none that are in the last. This means that Max says that the last numbers simply appear more often than the first on a long run. If a number from the last ones appears, then any number can be the next one, and if the first one appears, then the last one will appear with increased frequency. But this is nonsense. We all know that over long distances, the appearance of any number is equal to the appearance of another, both on the RNG and with the adaptive one.