Replays of finals and their adjacent ones.

Yesterday I had a marathon of watching how the bot plays and the response of the BV adaptive. About 10-15 orders were played, some short, some for many spins. It is interesting that the amount with which the bot started to play was basically the same as the one with which it left, but that is not the point. Very often the bot with its bets put the adaptive into such a state that it gave out such spins in a row: f,f or f,f+3 or f,f-3. For example: 6,16,36,36 or like this 1,7,11,14 or 6,9,19,29 That is, an example in numbers: if for example 5 came up, then we bet three chips in 5,15,25,35, 2,12,22,32, 8,18,28. In total, the sum of the bets will be: 12 numbers * 3 = 36 chips In case of winning: 3*35 + 3 = 108 chips. Total: 108-36 = 72 chips profit. In terms of winning: I personally observed that with this system there were 4-5 consecutive wins, for example: 2-22-2-12-15 That is, playing with this strategy: 72 * 4 = 218 chips in plus. In terms of losing: one win compensates for three losses, but of course on any scoreboard there are much more losses than three in a row. I thought about it and realized - so this is actually one to one, what to bet on dozens? Either way - a third of the field is closed, either way - zero has not been canceled. It turns out that the point of such a system is only to catch at least two repetitions and pour a little on the third for testing? Of course, a more interesting question is by what logic does the bot "force" the adaptive to show such miracles on the scoreboard.

the field is being pressed and the adaptive selects numbers from the remaining ones, they gradually begin to hurt the eye to play clearly on dozens or on 12 with some kind of pattern of numbers scattered across the field NEITHER THE SAME although for understanding adaptive reactions the game in dozens is FASTER and MORE VISIBLE