Casino does not pay winnings (reasons and problems)

Konrad wrote: I'll tell you briefly, I played one number, using the Koin method, I like this method the most.

What is this method, tell me more?

Mira wrote: It ended simply. The winnings were cancelled, the deposit was returned to the card. Playamo Casino.

Fine.
Casinos also require card verification because they are afraid of chargebacks.
the card owner can go to the bank (if the bank is normal, and not Sber with their bureaucracy) and say, like, it wasn’t me who paid and I didn’t buy anything at all.
In the USA and Europe, the money will be returned almost the next day.

Thanks to the licensee, the casino has payment processing.
First of all, you need to file a complaint to the licensee, the form should be on their website. Duplicate it to the contact e-mails.

Latest and Ask are not dispute commissions, but ordinary hyped casino sites.

If you didn't interfere with the program's operation, then the RNG allows any distortions. What do mathematicians say? 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10 is no better or worse than 5-17-0-21-33-9-20-20-3.

I think this adaptive jammed. The subroutine for rewarding the bold number displaced other blocks. The more you put in "2", the more often it poked in the generation.

LUCKY-13 wrote: A long time ago, a message from a person who developed software for BetCruiser flashed on one Western forum. They had a conflict and that person hinted that he had left some security hole in the client-server protocols. In particular, the client could influence the server generation.
At the time, this information was perceived as a public hoax. But who knows? KonradDidn't your father work for BetCruiser?

Perhaps Betvoyager has already encountered some forced generations. The tone of their letter is such that they are 1000% sure that the server could not loop so much and they blame you. It's a pity there are no statistics of those generations, to see how much 2 and its neighbors went beyond 3 sigma.

It would be ideal to take such statistics from Betvoyager for analysis, but for this it is necessary to persuade them to unblock the account and dive into the history. Copy everything.

I wrote only to the Ask and Latest forums. But no matter how hard you try, there is no movement from their side.
As for that game, I really must have accidentally hit a "hole" in the online casino generation! The bias was just crazy...
I didn't have enough brakes and I spent a lot of my deposit...
Who do you think is right in this situation?? After all, on my part, everything was according to the fair rules of the game! If the "screw-up" is on the part of the bastard, then the truth is on their side??

I'll try to contact them by mail, but since the account is blocked, they will most likely ignore me... Is it worth writing to Curacao?? Maybe someone knows if there have been such disputes, and how did they end? Maybe there is a law firm abroad that deals with such disputes?

A long time ago, a message from a person who developed software for BetCruiser flashed on one Western forum. They had a conflict and that person hinted that he had left some security hole in the client-server protocols. In particular, the client could influence the server generation.
At the time, this information was perceived as a public hoax. But who knows? KonradDidn't your father work for BetCruiser?

Perhaps Betvoyager has already encountered some forced generations. The tone of their letter is such that they are 1000% sure that the server could not loop so much and they blame you. It's a pity there are no statistics of those generations, to see how much 2 and its neighbors went beyond 3 sigma.

It would be ideal to take such statistics from Betvoyager for analysis, but for this you need to persuade them to unblock the account and dive into the history. Copy everything.

klick wrote:
I think this adaptive got stuck. The subroutine for rewarding the bold number displaced other blocks. The more you put in "2", the more often it poked in the generation.

+100500

I had this in Betvoyager with number 29 and its neighbors...
for 3 days you didn't have to worry about anything, put your neighbors on 29 and they played more often than they should
then it was like it was cut off and for a long time
.... from the initial deposit there were about 10 withdrawals, but I don't risk going even up to +500 euros = they've been very slow with withdrawals lately = the smaller the withdrawal, the faster they pay

/////////////////////
Roughly speaking, it is 100 times easier to make and withdraw 10 times +50+100 euros than to receive +1000 euros in one payment

100K Konrad is a serious pain for them )))) but a person who is not afraid to put 100 euros on a number, fully deserves to receive his LEGITIMATE WIN

/////////////////
look for them on social networks
It wouldn't hurt to have a post with a couple of screenshots and the title "Betvoyager - where's my winnings?!?!?!?"