The Most Dangerous Slots (Online Slot Machines)

I decided to make a list of the most dangerous slots, which are the most covered up, so let's go. 1st place - Space Wars (NetEnt) space wars The danger of this slot is in two things. The first is high stakes, up to 400 bucks per spin. The second is an extremely low multiplication, the maximum possible, or rather those that I saw are x300-x400 from the stake, which are EXTREMELY rare. Basically, multiplications are from x10 to x40. But! the whole trick is in high stakes, so it’s simply unrealistic to stop, you think now, now there will be a repeat, and the bet is already 400 and money for 3 spins… 2nd place - 300 shields (NextGen Gaming) 300-shields This is just a fucking slot, you can spin it for half a day and not catch anything, or you can catch 5 bonuses in an hour of play and earn a ton of money. It’s good that almost everywhere the maximum bet is 10 bucks, or even less! If the bet was high, this slot would undoubtedly take 1st place! 3rd place - Immortal Romance (Microgaming) I think everyone understands perfectly well what the trick of this slot is, you are constantly waiting for drops and preferably at least 3-4 pieces. You’ve been spinning for 2 hours already, and not a single drop, and all the time you think, well, now they’ll fall and I’ll quit! It's good that in most casinos the maximum bet on this slot is 6 bucks, but in the same Joy or X - you can spin 150 bucks per spin and now this is real adrenaline! 4th place - Book of RA Deluxe (Novomatic) Book-Of-Ra-Deluxe The most dangerous slot from Novomatic, it eats up money like a vacuum cleaner, the bets are almost unlimited, and the books fall very rarely (I'm afraid to even count how much money has been irretrievably lost in it). You sit and wait until there are sounds of 3 or more books falling out ... well, and then a guy in the bonus and off we go! 5th place - Gladiator (Playtech) Gladiator The slot is really dangerous, I don't know why, but usually when you play for the first time it pays out very big, and then each time less and less. Whether it pays out big or not is already clear at the stage of planning the bonus, whether you go to the very top or not. /TTRсasino.ru/

There are no dangerous slots. There is a character of the slot machine, and even on the same platform, the mathematics are different. When you play for a long time, you begin to feel how this or that slot machine behaves and what to expect from it. I have seen many crazy people who bring a lot of money into the hall and like to play on maxbets. Their single wins are impressive, but in the end this is a definite minus in the global period. I have seen many cautious players who can jerk off the slot for hours on $ 10 at cent rates. But the meaning of this activity is not clear ... The fundamental point is the game bank. If a lot of money was thrown into the slot machine (play only where there is movement), you need to make sure that it is in a benevolent mood (not in the piggy bank mode) and beautifully bring it to a large return. Basic pool strategies will do: 100pravda.com/igra-plus

I really like the opinion about RTP ))))

It has been said a hundred times that RTP is the return to the player from each spin. If the RTP is 96%, then the margin from each spin is 4%. You deposited $100, played 2,500 spins and that's it - your hundred is completely eaten up and the slot does not owe anything to anyone. If you lose before 2,500 spins, then the remainder that the margin did not eat goes to the slot bank; if you played 2,500 spins and there is money left on the balance - these are funds lost by other players.

//////////////////////////////// Everum Casino representative about RTP[/b] ////////////////////////////

The slot's RTP does not depend on the bet - the value always corresponds to the declared one. To be honest, I had the impression that some slots from some manufacturers have some algorithm that does not allow you to get particularly large wins at higher stakes. An example would be DOA and many screenshots with multipliers of x2000+ at small stakes, while at more serious stakes there are only a few screenshots. Please note that I am not saying that the slot's RPT does not match the declared one, but that there may be an algorithm that reduces the probability of getting large wins at higher stakes. At the same time, the overall return of the slot remains unchanged due to the fact that there are more small wins and large ones at small stakes. After we launched tournaments, I lost these thoughts because about 1000 people participate in freerolls every day and the games in them are no different from those you play for money. 1000 people with a balance of 2000 and most play at maximum stakes. Every day, we have dozens of five-figure wins in various slots, including DOA, and six-figure ones happen. That is, doubts about the fact that at different betting levels, different RTPs arise solely because there are MUCH fewer players playing at high stakes. In tournaments, the turnover is sufficient to draw some conclusions and the RPT as a result is exactly what is declared by the manufacturers, plus / minus small fluctuations.

/////////////////////////////// do not forget that 1) there are much fewer big-time players than those who spin small ones 2) big-time players do not really hang out on forums 3) when you yourself switch to LARGE bets for yourself, then the distance you yourself rewind is much shorter than in normal mode.... that's why you see much fewer bonuses and decent odds, hence the opinion like

at different denominations, the return is still different, and now the description just indicates the average value? Personally, I often noticed that at the same bet but with different denominations, the slot behaves differently (I only tested NetEnt)? That lowering or raising the bet, even slightly, greatly changes the behavior of the slot? For example, I play for $2 - bet level 10 with a denomination of 0.1 - the slot just eats it up. I bet level 2 and denomination of 0.5 (it turns out to be the same $2) - the slot starts playing differently

Dimok pushes his opinion