Glossary of terms for casino players (gambler slang)

"Statics, Dynamics, Trend" - Comparative Analysis in LongRun
win money, analysis and testing of gaming strategies Let's clarify the following question: "Is there a difference for a pure rng in the fundamental basis of a player's betting scheme?"

For the study, we will take three main tactical approaches: statics, dynamics and trend play. In all three cases, we will place only one of the sixlines on the field. But we will do this for a long time.

The progression of the sixline will be calculated for each branch autonomously, in symbolic steps - 1*3 sp., 2*3 sp., 3*3 sp., 4*3 sp. etc. ad infinitum. In case of winning, we start the progression from the very beginning.

1. Static - every spin we set the sixline 16/21 (KulibiKh's favorite position) and watch the credit movement in this case. The choice of the central sixline is also supported by additional reasoning. If the RNG has the goal of generating random numbers in the range of 0-36, then if there is even the slightest share of the "bell of normality" in it, it is the central part of the scale that will appear a little more often than the edges.

2. Dynamics - each spin we place a RANDOM sixline on the roulette field and watch the movement of the credit.

3. Trend - we bet only on the sixline, all numbers of which fell out during the session at least once. If there are several suitable sixlines, then the most "fresh" one is included in the forecast. In this version of the game, the entry point is floating, i.e. it depends on the fulfillment of the specified conditions.

The length of each session will be 200 spins. The final credit value of the previous session becomes the initial credit of the new session. The current betting level when crossing the session boundary is ZEROED. Accounting is carried out independently for each of the accepted betting options.

We display the end-to-end data flow on the graph, thus clearly seeing whether there is a difference in the tactical basis of the game.

avatar06/02/15 InquisitorEA wrote:

The conditions of the experiment are not clean. Create such conditions for the trend that the bet was every spin, as in the first two options. Otherwise, the generator's MO will act on the credit of the game on the trend less than on the first two options, and this credit will be significantly larger on the long run.

avatar06/02/15 Shpilevoy wrote:

the first 2 options will rewind 1000 spins, and the trend one will only rewind 500, because of this its credit may seem better, but it's only a matter of distance :punish:

The comment is accepted.

Let's make a common entry point to the session - the moment when the numbers of at least one sixline are played. In this case, all three tested options are placed synchronously and the number of played spins will be the same for everyone.

06/02

Conclusion when playing with progressions. We have long periods of play (around 1000 spins), when we do not see a fundamental difference. All three betting options move the credit in horizontal corridors. When the moment of forming strong vertical movements comes, the credit chart for random betting always(?) drops more than others (catches the longest stages of progression). That is, betting "from the lantern" is the worst choice of a progressive player. We do not know at what point we connect to the casino spins flow, so in any case, it is preferable to play statically or according to the trend.

07/02

The next stage of the test is to remove the progressions. Bet -1 chip in sixline. Win +6 chips. Let's look at the dynamics.

As we can see on 8000 spins, the situation has not changed. That is, random remains the surest worst option.

avatar 02/08/15 iliya wrote:

It's funny that according to the test results, statics is the most effective. But we understand that statics is the best bet for adaptive.



avatar

02/08/15 InquisitorEA wrote:

There is no adaptive here. We are investigating the RNG. And no, the statics in this case are as bad as the trend. They were on the same line in 800-900 games. Scroll a couple hundred more games and the statics and trend will probably be on the same line.
It is too early to draw any conclusions. Everything is clear with these two tests. More interconnected tests are needed.

09/02

As we can see, the dynamics of the previous settings do not change much. Due to the absence of progressions, the slope line (loan loss) is flatter, but just as unprofitable.

1370 games played with 200 spins (Oh, Satan, InquisitorEA - the prediction came true).

02/09/15 InquisitorEA wrote:

"That's what I was talking about. And don't think that the dynamics are much worse. Although it is always at the bottom, it is not that far from the statics and trend. 274,000 spins, and the difference is only 2,000 chips. I would say that all 3 approaches are equally bad."

New stage of the test. We leave the flat, but we lay out the sixline bet specifically for the numbers that make it up. That is, the bet is now -6 chips for a full sixline, the win is +36 chips (the chip in the number plays). Why are we doing this? Let's make a small amendment to the forecast model - we exclude from the bet field the numbers that have NOT dropped out in the last 50 spins.

Another innovation will be the display in the comments to each game of the MAXIMUM step of the progression for each branch. Since we do not have the progression itself, but it is interesting to know the length of the largest loss chain that occurred in the current 200 spins. The only thing to remember is that the full sixline is not always closed. There may be situations when the bet is skipped altogether - this is when all 6 numbers fall into the "50" exception.

Our session will have 250 spins, of which the first 50 are not active, used only to collect statistics of exceptions.

Let's look at the results.

We rolled 50,000 spins (250*200 sp.), the statics of the central six failed (?), unlike the dynamic and trend tactics. We see a clear absence of a sloping corridor, which in all previous experiments pulled the credit into the minus. Can this be considered a nihilated -MO? Let's see how the situation develops. In the meantime, saving bets on numbers frozen in the last 50 spins gives a fluctuation around the zero mark. No growth, but no loss either.

New stage of testing.

We exclude Frozen-40, in calculating the maximum loss chains we take into account empty spins (when there are no bets) and, finally, we exclude from the bets spins where the forecast gave only 1 number.

Let's set up a smooth progression (with zeroing between games) and see the result.

avatar 10/02/15 Coin_8 wrote:

Forget about deterministic progressions with a floating betting field width! Only a self-regulating bet, which in case of a win ensures a breakthrough of the current MAX. We know the maximum point of the $ micro-cycle. We know how many numbers need to be forced. Then everything is simple - how many chips need to be put in each number to jump above the current max from the current credit bar, taking into account the bet? Moreover, now no one talks about table limits...





The result speaks for itself.

Rare line collapses are places where the progression did not fit into the allotted 200 spins of the game session. Here we fix the loss in fact and start a new game from the first step of the SELF-REGULATING progression.

Let's look further.



avatar

10/02/15 InquisitorEA wrote:

I don't understand why this test is needed?
"bet in 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / for 803 chips"
Here the progression is simply immortal. In practice, this is not applicable. 60 steps in this example. Leave it a limit of 5 steps and you will see where the graph lines go.

...Recall that we are just looking at Long Run for now to see if there is a fundamental advantage in the player's choice of tactics. In the given example, if you play with chips of $0.01, then 5 numbers at $8 is a completely tolerable bet. Another question is whether it was worth increasing it by 60 steps?

Kulibih wrote:

My grandfather used to say, "The hen pecks grain by grain, and by evening the whole yard is covered in shit."
I'm not chasing after a bigger and better deal now, I'm moving towards a gradual increase in stakes.
Now I have deposited 1000 and am playing with 0.01 chips on my account, 4024 and 1800 on withdrawal.
But soon there will be 10k and you can take the 0.1 chip and try to make 30k...
at least that's what I'm striving for.

...saw that in principle there is almost no difference what scheme I play and where I bet. In almost all games, sooner or later, a cold wave gives way to a wave of losses. And the main thing is the distance at which you intend to get a certain result. The shorter the distance, the riskier the game. The longer, the less profitable. And all this chatter about MO -2.7 is needed only to force players to play BIG (take a deposit and sink it in 10-20 moves in the hope that they will get lucky).

Chaos Theory and the Mathematics of Casino Games
chaotic dynamic systems that are described in mathematical terms of game theory

We continue to reveal the secrets of professional play. Understanding the deep nature of random processes and realizing their scale - provide the key to stable victories in games with negative mathematical expectation.

Almost all advanced players are fixated on searching for patterns in the operation of the RNG (hereinafter, the term RNG also includes live roulettes, online games with a live dealer). To do this, tons of statistics are taken, many hours of work are carried out on its comprehensive analysis and identification of "magic formulas" of the pattern of events. Moreover, the more complex the strategy and the larger the volume of history taken for analysis, the harder it is to find hidden patterns...

As exercises for the mind in combinatorics and logic, we welcome these studies. But as practice and experience show, all the solutions found are only temporary and absolutely unsuitable for meeting new games.

You must accept the obvious - real randomness implies a COMPLETE ABSENCE of patterns. Hoping that you will find a physical vulnerability of the RNG is at least stupid. In our time, there are no roulette wheels dried out from the heat of the fireplace and one-sidedly working microcircuits. Any flaws in the RNG operation are immediately detected and eliminated. Therefore, prepare yourself that we are always dealing with His Majesty Chance.

Once we are determined to enter the realm of Chance, we must understand the nature of this phenomenon and learn to use it.

Let's start with the theory.

Please read the summary carefully to gain a general understanding of the phenomenon being studied.

Chaos Theory.
The concept of Chaos refers to the so-called theory of dynamic systems. A dynamic system consists of two parts: the concept of states and dynamics (the evolution of the system over time). Development can be observed in the state space (phase space) - an abstract space in which the coordinates are the components of the state. In this case, the coordinates are selected depending on the context. In the case of a mechanical system, these can be position and speed, in the case of an ecological model - populations of various biological species.

A dynamical system can evolve either in continuous time or in discrete time. The former is called a flow, the latter a mapping (sometimes a cascade). A pendulum moves continuously from one position to another and is therefore described by a dynamical system with continuous time, i.e. a flow. The number of insects born each year in a given habitat, or the time interval between drops from a leaking faucet, is more naturally described by a system with discrete time, i.e. a mapping.

Initial measurements of all external and internal causes influencing the development of the system can never be fully determined. Chaos ensures that these current uncertainties will quickly take the system beyond its predictability.

Some large-scale phenomena are predictable, while others are not. For example, the trajectory of a soccer ball is in principle predictable, and every player intuitively takes advantage of this whenever he plays soccer. In contrast, the trajectory of a hot air balloon when the air escapes from it is unpredictable: it tilts and spins erratically, and its flight cannot be foreseen.
This dual behavior is also produced by fluid flow. Under some circumstances, it is laminar—even, stable, and easily predictable. Under other circumstances, the flow becomes turbulent—uneven, unstable, irregular—and difficult to predict.
How can we explain the significant difference between laminar and turbulent flow?
In a turbulent flow, many different independent oscillations (vortices) occur. Although each individual oscillation may be simple, their complex combination results in motion that is impossible to predict.
French mathematician Henri Poincaré noted that unpredictable phenomena that arise "by chance" are more likely to be characteristic of systems where small changes in the present lead to noticeable changes in the future. Let's imagine a stone on top of a hill. By pushing it slightly in one direction or another, we make it roll down completely different paths. Chaotic systems are sensitive to external influences at every point of their movement.

Phase space provides a powerful tool for studying chaotic systems because it allows us to represent their behavior in geometric form. Thus, in the example of a pendulum with friction that eventually comes to rest, its trajectory in phase space comes to a certain point. This is a fixed point. Since it attracts nearby orbits, it is called an attractive fixed point, or attractor. If you give the pendulum a small push, its orbit will return to the fixed point. Any system that eventually comes to rest has a fixed point in phase space. This phenomenon is very general: energy losses due to friction or, for example, viscosity lead to orbits being attracted to a small set of phase space that has a lower dimension. Any such set is called an attractor. Roughly speaking, an attractor corresponds to the steady-state behavior of the system - the one to which it tends.

Some systems do not stop after a long period of time, but cyclically go through a certain sequence of states.
No matter how the pendulum is set in motion, it will eventually end up in the same cycle. Such attractors are called limit cycles.

To find out how a chaotic system evolves from a given initial state, we need to move along an orbit. With this method, the amount of computational work is proportional to the time we want to move along the orbit.

Chaos Theory attractors are fractals: geometric objects that exhibit increasing amounts of detail as they grow larger.
Fractals can have different sizes and orientations in space, but the same geometric shape.
Chaos naturally produces fractals. In order for motion to remain in a finite region, nearby trajectories, although diverging, must eventually curve and pass close to each other. This repeats over and over, producing folds within folds, and so on ad infinitum. As a result, chaotic attractors have a very beautiful microscopic structure.

Two trajectories with close initial conditions diverge exponentially during evolution, so that they pass close to each other only for a very short time. In the case of non-chaotic attractors, the qualitative picture is completely different. For them, close trajectories remain close, small errors remain limited, and the behavior is predictable.

The key to understanding chaotic behavior is provided by a simple stretching and folding procedure in phase space. Exponential divergence is a local phenomenon: since the attractor is finite in size, two orbits on a chaotic attractor cannot diverge exponentially forever. This means that such an attractor must fold within itself. Even though the orbits diverge and follow completely different paths, they must eventually pass close to each other again. As a result, the orbits on the chaotic attractor are shuffled, much like cards in a deck of cards being shuffled. The randomness of chaotic orbits is a result of this shuffling process. The stretching and folding happens over and over again, creating folds within folds, and so on ad infinitum. In other words, a chaotic attractor is a fractal—an object that reveals more and more detail as it gets larger.

The riverbed and the joker in Chaos theory.
Stable attractors look like blocks of ice. The development and change of the attractor usually occurs from the periphery (melting of the edges). The main channel of the attractor is destroyed last.
Due to fluctuations, quantitative changes constantly accumulate in the system, which sooner or later will manifest themselves in a transition to a qualitatively new (often negating previous forms and properties) state. Such a transition usually occurs by a jump at a point in phase space, which is called a joker.

Chaos mixes orbits in phase space in the same way a baker kneads bread dough. To visualize what happens to nearby trajectories on a chaotic attractor, try this experiment. Add a drop of blue food coloring to the dough. Kneading the dough is a combination of two actions: rolling it out (in which case the colored spot expands) and folding it. At first, the spot simply gets longer, then folds form, and this is repeated over and over again. Upon closer inspection, it turns out that the dough consists of many layers of alternating white and blue. After just 20 steps, the original spot has stretched more than 20 million times its original length, and its thickness has shrunk to molecular dimensions. The blue color has completely mixed with the dough. Chaos acts in exactly the same way, only instead of mixing dough, it mixes phase space.

The stretching and folding of a chaotic attractor systematically eliminates the initial information and replaces it with new information: stretching increases small-scale uncertainties, folding brings widely separated trajectories closer together and erases large-scale information. Thus, chaotic attractors act as a kind of pump, “pumping” microscopic fluctuations into a macroscopic manifestation. It is clear from this that there can be no exact solution, no shortcut to predicting the future. Very little time passes, and the uncertainty that arose in the initial measurement covers the entire attractor, depriving us of the possibility of making any predictions: there is no longer any causal connection between the past and the future.

Chaotic systems generate randomness by themselves and do not require external random influences. The random behavior of such systems is not simply due to the amplification of errors and the loss of foresight; it is due to the complex trajectories that are formed by stretching and folding.

The evolution of any individual component of the system is determined by the other components with which it interacts. Thus, information about such components is implicitly contained in the "history" of the individual component. To recreate the "equivalent" phase space, we simply take one component and treat the measured values at fixed delays (e.g., a second ago, two seconds ago, etc.) as if they were new dimensions.
These "delayed" values can be thought of as new coordinates defining a point in a multidimensional phase space. Repeating the procedure with other delay intervals, we obtain many such points. Then, using other techniques, we can check whether these points lie on the chaotic attractor or not. Although this representation is arbitrary in many respects, it turns out that it preserves many important properties of the attractor, which turn out to be independent of the details of the reconstruction.

For Chaos Theory, long-term forecasting is impossible in principle, since due to bifurcation processes, the final state of the system has an infinite number of variants. This must be taken into account when assessing the merits of theories and strategies. Thus, testing a theory becomes a much more subtle procedure, relying more on statistical and geometric properties than on detailed predictions "here and now".
In the case of chaotic dynamic systems, we come to the concept of "forecast horizons", i.e. a certain distance of advancement along the orbit that allows a high probability of confirmation of the forecast.

Chaos is often viewed in terms of the limitations it imposes, such as the lack of predictability. However, nature can use chaos constructively. By amplifying small fluctuations, it may be opening up natural systems to novelty. Perhaps the bird that escaped a predator to avoid capture took advantage of the chaotic regulation of its flight as an element of surprise. Biological evolution requires genetic variation, and chaos produces random changes in structure, thus opening up the possibility of bringing variation under evolutionary control.

Even the process of intellectual progress depends on the emergence of new ideas and the discovery of new ways to connect old ideas. Innate creativity may conceal a chaotic process that selectively amplifies small fluctuations and transforms them into macroscopic coherent states of mind that we experience as thoughts. Sometimes these may be decisions or what is recognized as an exercise of will. In this view, Chaos provides us with a mechanism for the exercise of free will in a world governed by deterministic laws.


"Chaos Theory" short summary CMP, 2014

Prerequisites for the application of Chaos Theory to the game of roulette.
Coin_8Coin recommends applying Chaos Theory to casino games with caution.

It is necessary to clearly understand the phases of the game - when we are dealing with a pure RNG (pRNG), and when our opponent is adaptive algorithms.

Next we will talk about truly random events on roulette.

Some cyclicity and regularity of events is confirmed by personal observations of most experienced players. This is manifested in the "vision" of certain patterns of throws and turns of the game situation. At the same time, players have both purely personal combinations and links, as well as patterns common among players.

On the one hand, this is explained by selective emotional fixation of personal game situations. Thus, some bright events are imprinted in the player's memory. Then their expectation is partially confirmed during subsequent games. They are even more fixed in the consciousness and remembered. Considering that many players think trivially (and the game field is only 37 numbers), the combinations remembered are the same: "36 after 0", "5-10-23", "if 8 and 11 are closed, it will fall in 30", "three pins in a row" and so on. Nonsense.

On the other hand, there is a clear trend that these patterns work in some casinos and do not work in others.

More precisely, each casino, if you dig deeper, will find its own game features. It is this circumstance that gives grounds to believe that patterns are not just mind games under the influence of adrenaline, but real cyclical manifestations in the work of the RNG.

Casinos where patterns are found and "work" stably become favorites for the player, and casinos where nothing works are perceived as "goaty". I know many players who have been playing for many years in a narrow list of places, because according to them, in other places they are totally unlucky - they can't win, although the strategies are the same.

Usually, the vision of spin combinations is formed over several years. That is, the attractors of numbers falling out on the roulette are either extremely complex or greatly stretched out in time. Although a persistent player will collect and drive into his subconscious the repetition of game situations. Of course, these are only small fragments of real random processes, but they will work from time to time.

The larger the player's collection of templates and the more complex they are, the more "cool" the player considers himself. In fact, we are always interested not in quantity, but in quality. Most "cool" players do not bother with ACTUAL CHECKING the effectiveness of their developments. How unprofitable or profitable is each idea? Specifically and in numbers.

I continue to insist that it is better for a player to get rid of his old emotional patterns. In 99% of cases, they close the game. A person inadequately perceives the situation through the prism of a spontaneous and strong desire to perform this or that combination that he once remembered. As a result, he will lose in about 4 out of 5 cases. However, that single 1 out of 5 times (when his favorite combination played) is enough for the brain to continue to keep it on the list of "I know this game".

How to get real fractals that really work and give the player the opportunity to beat the casino in the long run?

Let's figure it out.

Chaos Theory in the Game (BetVoyager Practice)

Explanation of the video lesson.

To understand the connection between Chaos Theory and practical roulette play, let's start by using simple associations with familiar geometric shapes.

Imagine a tree.
Each tree is a vivid example of a chaotic construction with unique geometry - they vary infinitely in height, contour, mutual arrangement of branches and leaves. Find the nearest tree with your gaze and try to understand in 3D space the location and orientation of each leaf on all its branches. For a person, this is almost unrealistic, even for a static position of all elements. And what if we add dynamics - a slight breeze that rocks and sways the crown? Accurately recreating the phase space of such a composition will require enormous computing resources.

Fractals and frames.
Despite all the complexity of the "construction" of the tree, we perceive it easily, without overloading the brain with small details. Otherwise, if a person entered the forest, he would immediately go crazy...
How do we perceive trees? Our consciousness transmits a picture of a tree of the "landscape" type. In such a photo, only large elements are visible - general outlines, trunk, in some places the main branches are visible, there is a greater or lesser density of foliage. By these attributes, we recognize a specific tree species. If necessary, we "zoom in on the picture" (frame) and perceive smaller details. At maximum zoom, we see every crack in the bark and every vein on the leaf.

Thus, the tree is a clear example of chaotic construction and demonstration of the natural perception of fractal structures.

Let's engage our imaginative thinking...

Each game is a unique tree. Let the height of the tree be the maximum possible win in a given game session. The branches of the tree are the game scenarios, and the foliage is the random spins of the roulette wheel.

Let's consider several "wooden" associations:

1. During the game, you are somewhere in a tree, surrounded on all sides by dense foliage (current spin history). Perhaps you are even hanging upside down

2. Many ape-men sit in the thickets of a tree and carefully study the fluttering leaves (backs) surrounding them in order to understand which way the trunk (the road to the top) is. Having examined everything carefully, they persistently crawl in the chosen direction. Usually it is too late for them to understand that instead of the trunk they have dangerously come close to the thin edge of a branch and that the next careless movement will inevitably cause a fall.

3. Playing roulette on impulse is like jumping blindfolded from side to side, hoping your hands will be able to grab the next lifting branch. The wider the betting field, the more hands you have... The harder the attack, the higher you jump, but also the more weight you have...
a) You can jump in a circle around the trunk for a long time until you hit several very thin branches in a row.
b) Jumps often occur that end with empty hands and a painful fall from a height (it’s good if it doesn’t fall straight to the ground).
c) Having jumped blindfolded to the top, you do not stop, because you do not know that this is the limit. All further attempts to rise even higher end in a fall (loss of money and sadness in the eyes).

4. Trees can be very different, but in principle, three-kilometer-high trees only exist in fairy tales.

5. If you don't have a general tree frame and clear data about your location on it, you won't be able to understand exactly which way to move to reach the winning summit. Woodpeckers and caterpillars won't help you...

So, your imaginative thinking is already stretched to the limit it's time to move on to the practice of the game, especially since you always get the general frame of the game only after the fact.



Hello,
Avax!
IPM: 1918.075
You have entered a closed section of the site.
Chaos Theory at the service of a professional roulette player might look like this.

1. The spins of the wheel of each game session grow into a chaotic structure similar to a tree.

2. Game "trees" can be of the most bizarre shape and the most varied height (profitability).

3. Let's assume (and this is not logical) that any limited-length roulette session has a trunk leading to the very top. If the player "climbs" precisely along the trunk, he gets the maximum profit. If the player deviates and climbs along any side branch, carried away by the rustling of leaves, he will certainly fall down - into loss.

4. We reject the principles of blind guessing and old experience, because chaotic structures have an infinite number of implementations. Attempts to transfer your past experience to new games are not effective in the long life of a gardener

5. How to play?

The strategy is based on the implementation of hypothesis p.3

"Trees"
ANY sequence of 20-50 spins of ANY roulette.

"Trunk"
Post factum, it is always obvious that ANY limited story had a not very wide STATIC combination of numbers “sewn into it” that would easily bring the player into the black on rebets.

"Forecast"
We cannot guess IN ADVANCE that magic group of numbers that must be closed specifically in this game for a confident victory.
But our goal is to STEP-BY-STEP, in real time, recreate a set very close to ideal, and if the game attractor does not fall apart, then we will squeeze out a decent profit on rebets.

"Attractor"
Imagine again a densely branched tree. Imagine a silver ribbon that wraps around the trunk and goes up to the very crown.
All spins of the winning set are on this tape. Some numbers appear here once and disappear forever, others are repeated with different frequency.
In fact, this imaginary tape is our spin statistics for the entire current game. It's a pity that before the game we definitely don't see a single number...

An alternative to guessing is to slowly build our betting field based on what appears on the roulette wheel.
We will, with a slight delay, recreate that magical set of numbers that is always obvious after the fact of the game.

First spin - number 20 came up.
Once it has come out - it is already an ACCOMPLISHED FACT! It means that this number has ALREADY BEEN INTEGRATED by chaos into a winning combination, which we could see at the end of the game.
Apart from this real EVENT we know nothing else for sure. Forget your past gaming experience.
Since it definitely fell out, then if we knew it in advance, of course it would pay for itself in the next 36 moves. And if it appears several times on the silver ribbon, then this is already within 20-50 spins of the game a sure rise (a small advance to the top).

We are putting up number 20. And we will continue to put it up on rebets.
We also discuss all subsequent numbers, and gradually expand our rebet field with newly dropped numbers.
Ah, if only I knew you all in advance... a tear rolled down my unshaven cheek

- Ugh, so this is a game on repeats??? A hopeless cause!!! - many of you exclaimed.
This is not entirely true.

Once you have understood the framework of the idea, let's add some "suckers".

Chaos plays with geometry. Orbits have points of close passage and divergence.
Since number 20 has come up, we admit (and this does not contradict logic) that a moment MAY come when the next trajectory of the spin orbit will pass somewhere near this already actually accomplished point.
Therefore, we do not simply put 20 in the first step, but put it boldly in 20 and slightly grab some neighboring numbers. I used 2 splits, because I think this is optimal. The only thing is that these can be not horizontal, but vertical splits or even coner. Everything depends on the mood, as long as it is beautiful
We add these suction cups to each betting center.

I'm not a fan of covering most of the board with chips, so according to the "Trinity's a blessing" principle, I get three static bombs on the board, with their tendrils-detonators spread out.
Another useful proverb is "Movement is life!" Three points of support are enough to use the fourth free limb to search for a lifting branch.
While chance is chasing the ball between mined islands with payouts, we try to catch it in a small area jumping around the field.
Since we are on the "wooden theme", imagine that you are leaning on something with your feet and one hand, and blindly waving your free hand upwards to FIND the next branch and pull yourself up.
If you just raise your hand and wait for the branch to fall into your palm by itself, then this is only possible in a strong storm wind... Such a wind that you will be blown off the tree in a couple of minutes anyway... and we play in calm, clear weather...
Think about how you would wave your hand over your head in dense foliage, and how you would catch a ball on a field.

You need to run after the ball until the winnings enter your static zone and the credit starts to grow rapidly.
You stick in place with your 4th center and then even rebets...
Perhaps this is 60-80% the best static combination for the current game that we have selected.

"Practice"
Practice is needed to feel the dispersion and waves of credit movement.
Don't forget about variations and experiments within the global concept.

"Couplings and reinforcements"
When your centers are built in close proximity to each other, it is not a sin to plug the empty narrow strip between them with stakes. It may well turn out that both centers will equally attract the next trajectory of the spin orbit and it will lie right in the middle in neutral waters.

"Progressions"
Add a small progression if the credit sags. Remember that the branch you are sitting on is bending and returning to the previous level (if you do not slide down) is possible only by a jerk, no conveyors or escalators.
There are periods of credit drawdown, but you shouldn't be afraid of them! 5 minutes of frequent wins return the lost money and bring it to the plus.
The narrower and more powerful your bets, the greater the dispersion of the game (the range of minus and plus credit) is.
If the statics don’t work for a long time, don’t be afraid to cut the current game at the root and start all over again, from scratch, with a new spin.

"Vertex"
If you really picked a betting field that is very close to ideal for this game, then you don't have to worry about it at all! Just rebets!
A stable attractor and your successful replication of the ideal betting field will pump up the credit and will definitely raise it up.
I don't feel the urge to fly into space on the rebet... In reality, there are no three-kilometer trees!
After each noticeable increase in credit, I move on to the next tree. At the same time, I immediately forget how exactly I earned the last +$200.




Go to the contents of the Book of Coin...
This all works well until the moment when a hungry ADAPTIV starts howling hoarsely under the tree you are sitting on!
But that's another story, to which Chaos Theory has nothing to do

Hi all,
Coin

Super Cold (S&D) - static vs. dynamic?
Roulette game analysis, choosing the best casino game strategy As part of studying the theory of natural adaptivity of the RNG (global alignment of game situations), we will consider in detail the game in the cold sectors of the wheel.

The basic strategy will be very simple - based on the last 10-20 spins, we select the sector of the wheel of 9 numbers in which the least number of spins occurred.

Next we use two combinations:

SCS (super cold static) - we statically set the found cold sector, use a smooth progression until the first win. After that, a new forecast will mark a new area for bets.

SCD (super cold dynamic) - differs from the previous version in that each spin we analyze statistics, look for a new cold sector and place bets in it. This combination also uses a smooth progression through to the first win.

If the bets of both combinations intersect, the sum of the bets on the numbers is summed up.

In Spin Analysis we will clearly see and compare the effectiveness of each approach separately. In the strategy checker there will be a general result when they are applied simultaneously in the game.

Among other things, you will receive a clear answer to the question: "Is it possible to build your strategy on playing something that hasn't fallen for a long time?"

Super Hot (S&D) - static vs. dynamic?
Roulette game analysis, choosing the best casino game strategy As part of studying the theory of natural adaptivity of the RNG (global alignment of game situations), we will consider in detail the game in the hot sectors of the wheel.

The basic strategy will be very simple - based on the last 10-20 spins, we select the sector of the wheel of 9 numbers in which the largest number of spins fell.

Next we use two combinations:

SHS (super hot static) - we statically set the found hot sector, use a smooth progression until the first win. After that, a new forecast will mark a new area for bets.

SHD (super hot dynamic) - differs from the previous version in that each spin we analyze statistics, look for a hot sector and place bets in it. This combination also uses a smooth progression through to the first win.

If the bets of both combinations intersect, the sum of the bets on the numbers is summed up.

In Spin Analysis we will clearly see and compare the effectiveness of each approach separately. In the strategy checker there will be a general result when they are applied simultaneously in the game.

Among other things, you will receive a clear answer to the question: "Is it possible to build your strategy on playing replays?"

Shpilevoy, 17.06.2017 03:44
Shpilevoy
13-31 are reversals, but many also call them mirrors
12-21
23-32

ABCBA mirrors
ABBA
Avax, 15.01.2017 14:55
Avax
"Hot numbers are numbers that haven't appeared for a long time."

And here, on the contrary, the hot ones are the overclocked numbers, which have become more frequent with dropouts.
Avax, 15.01.2017 14:53
Avax
"Cold numbers are numbers that have been drawn frequently recently."

Mistake, cold ones are those that, on the contrary, have been falling out very weakly lately.
Avax, 15.01.2017 14:29
Avax
A professional player is a player who does not play without a "chance".
"Chance" ("Shansik") - in slang means that the player has a way to give an advantage over the casino or another player.
/Vitaly Queenstar/
Mira, 21.10.2016 16:12
Mira
Adaptive algorithm is a practice that software manufacturers and online casinos deny. This term refers to interference in the operation of gaming software in order to make the game non-random. An adaptive algorithm can take into account certain conditions and produces adjusted results so that the player gradually loses. At the same time, users get the impression of a random and fair game. The casino can adjust the algorithm based on the amount of money the player has, the size of the bets, the limits, the strategies used. But there is protection against such fraudulent practices in the form of the MD5 system, as well as SHA256. With their help, players receive encrypted results even before the draws begin. Then the results are decrypted and compared with the real ones.

The roulette wheel is a round structure built into the roulette table. The wheel has evenly distributed sectors into which the ball lands.

Hot numbers – numbers that have not been drawn for a long time. Dozens – this type of bet involves covering twelve numbers at the same time. There are only three dozens, which include consecutive numbers: 1-12, 13-24 and 25-36.

Zero is one of the numbers in roulette, marked with zero (0). Many players think that this number gives the casino an advantage, but they have no concrete evidence other than its green color
In fact, the house edge of zero only comes when the bet is made on equal chances. Then the casino will always win when zero comes up. The casino has an advantage in any case. But in other situations, it is provided by the lowered payout coefficients compared to the probability.

Game progression – changing the size of the bet. Following the progression, the player either increases the bet or decreases it until he achieves a win. There are many such methods, the most famous of which is the Martingale system.

History of numbers dropped out (statistics board) – in a separate table, the online casino shows the latest numbers dropped out during the last roulette draws. Usually, the results of 10-15 spins are offered, and sometimes the records are stored from the beginning of the game session.

The history of the origin of roulette is an ambiguous issue. Researchers cannot choose one inventor, so the versions of the history of roulette are different. Moreover, there are two probable inventors who lived in different countries. One of them was a genius in mathematics named Blaise Pascal, and the other was just lucky. Still, many are inclined to believe that Pascal was the author of this creation. Although there are ardent opponents of such statements. Pascal studied cycloids related to probability theory for a long time. He wrote two works, the titles of which include the word "roulette". But his works are not about gambling. Pascal lived in France. There is also an Italian version of the origin. It is indicated in one of the encyclopedias, which began to be published in the middle of the 19th century. The encyclopedia describes a game called "Italian roulette", which had a drum with a standard set of numbers.

Columns – a type of bet that covers 12 numbers. There are three columns in total, in the form of three vertical rows. The numbers are not in order: from 1 to 34, 2-35, 3-36.

Corner (coner) – a corner bet that covers 4 numbers at the same time. The bet should be placed in the center of the intersection of four numbers that form a square. The total number of corners is 22.

Table limits – maximum/minimum bet amounts.

Maximum bet – the bet size that cannot be exceeded for a specific type of bet.

Minimum bet – bets below this specified value are not accepted.

One number (in number, unplen) - a type of bet, in which a bet is made on a clean number. The number can be any, at the discretion of the player. It is believed that it should fall out in 100 spins. Casino Mining Pool checked this statement, on average, numbers close in cycles of 120 spins. However, there are deviations, when the number can freeze even on 1500 spins.


Flat bets are fixed bet amounts. Flat betting strategies are not common. Progressions are usually preferred.

Prison Rule – present in the French Roulette rules. It gives a second chance to even-money bets if they lose because zero lands.

Counter-scheme generation is a method of cheating a casino. It involves tracking the system a player is playing on and then rigging the results so that the player loses using their system.

Even odds is the name of a roulette bet that gives the player approximately equal chances of winning and losing. In reality, the odds are not equal, but slightly tilted in favor of the house, since zero is always on the casino's side with equal chances. In double zero roulettes, this type of bet becomes even more disadvantageous for players.

Roulette wheel - a wheel where the dealer drops the ball. The wheel disc spins, causing the ball to move around the wheel until it lands in a sector.

Game statistics – shows the results of the analysis of past spins. For example, the percentage of a certain color/number/column, etc.

Sixline – covering six numbers in one bet. The player bets on two adjacent rows. The winnings are paid at odds of 5:1.

Spin – rotation of the wheel, represents one draw. Comes from the English “spin”, which means “to rotate”.

Split is the second most risky bet. Only two numbers overlap, so it is difficult for the player to win.

Player bet – the money the player pays to participate in the game. Depending on the numbers the player chooses, there are twelve types of bets.

Street – the player covers one row of three numbers with this bet.

Betting table – a roulette table where bets are accepted. It has a special wheel and a betting table.

Oral bets – free the player from the need to move the chips. You can simply say your bet out loud. Often this practice involves playing on credit. Cold numbers – numbers that have come up frequently recently.

A blank spin is a spin without any bets from the player.

Series (zero-spire, big, orfolines, small) and neighbors of numbers - oral bets that imply the arrangement of numbers in a combination on the wheel track and not on the table.

FoxDuhovny, 21.10.2016 14:31
FoxSpiritual
It's cool... the credit ran out... and it ran out... but there are those who have a lot of change and they load it into the steering wheel for 5 hours and then remove the exclamation, please...
Mira, 21.10.2016 14:17
Mira
In casino jargon, a "nerd" means a player who plays long and hard at low stakes without any visible results. "He jerks off, jerks off, but can't cum." Not to be confused with gambling addiction!
FoxDuhovny, 24.04.2016 14:26
FoxSpiritual
Enticing the client! - when numbers different from the final and the bet as a whole fall out, the adaptive immediately in a series of its numbers leading away throws out an unrelated plot or even a series of several plots in order to disrupt the game strategy.
The plot is an unmarked (as if random) special throw of correct numbers in a row from (2 to 5 numbers) (mirror (6,9,12,21,31,13,16,19,26,29 etc.), repeat (2,12,2,12), doubling (2,17,34), double (11,22), multiplication (3,5,15,30) in half (36,18,9,32,16, inverted (18,25...25,18) Rook (1,34,3,36) Bishop (3,7,15...) opposite (0,10,5,32,24,26...)
sincere neighbors (4,7,2,28,19,29,21). As soon as you set the bet oriented towards the continuation of the correct numbers, the adaptive plays sectors with numbers on the wheel located from each other like the rays on the Mercedes sign.
FoxDuhovny, 22.04.2016 23:31
FoxSpiritual
I agree! I'm trying to get through to everyone from the stage. It's not about mirrors or beautiful combinations, my trend is nothing and nowhere and never lasted more than two months, I already wanted to leave but I saw that as soon as you introduce a new or well-forgotten bet(s), the trend changes, and then I began to work on how to make it change according to the condition and then came the alternation of different endings hidden inside the bet with the same bet without endings with open 2-6 numbers in floating mode, a constant plus on the balance of several dollars during long sessions more than 11-23 spins and the trend changed! and then everything repeated as below in the form of deja vu as if time was rewound back or the rhythm played its part on the BIS!
Coin_8, 22.04.2016 23:18
Coin_8
Since we're talking about algorithms...

You can't consider 12-21 as the only correct combination, and everything else as an adaptive action
How is 12-5 worse?

The algorithm works in a cloud of variations and for roulette it is ANTI-SYMMETRY and ANTI-ORDER. Chaos, my dear, however...
The cloud is manifested in the fact that, for example, today

12-21 (up to 2L as it has become fashionable) goes - - - + + + - + - + + - - - - - + + + - +
or
1-0-36 + + - - - + + - - - + - + - - + + + + - - + + + + - - - + + - +

and tomorrow these combinations play out in approximately the same way.
But the day after tomorrow everything changes dramatically

12-21 - - - - - + + - - - - - -
1-0-36 - - - + - - - + - - - -
and this drawing on the same table lasts for hundreds (if not thousands) of spins

I have provided real data, you can observe similar things yourself.

***
Therefore, at the beginning, it is necessary to understand, without provocations of the adaptive, what are the trends today. And only then choose a game line within the framework of the ALGORITHM.
Adaptive will wake up automatically when the loan breaks through the permitted upper limit.
And how to make him continue to throw money at you is the key question of understanding ADAPTIV.


FoxDuhovny, 22.04.2016 18:02
FoxSpiritual
Hypothesis!!! If we can calculate the depth of Adaptive with an accuracy of "N" up to three neighbors from a simple row! then we will be able to win finals with an accuracy of ">" 3 out of 5!!!
FoxDuhovny, 22.04.2016 17:56
FoxSpiritual
In the Crystal Casino the terms Algorithm and Adaptive look like this:
Algorithm - rhythmic operation of software in game mode when before the start of a series a checksum of three numbers falls out where the last number is the sum of the two previous ones in a positional and significant version, for example: "12" (3) "13" (4) "25" (7) then a series of falling numbers has an initial and final entry number + the series itself, for example, chess, repeating the fallen number through one, for example, 22,26,19,26,22 .. or a mirror with numbers in a row or strictly through one, for example, 13,31 or 26,16,29, or before the numbers there is a pair of numbers also in a familiar form, doubling 17,12,21,34, etc. This is the rhythm of the algorithm without adaptivity.
When Adaptive is turned on, the rhythm is broken, the checksums do not match according to one of the criteria, and the desired numbers (on which the bet is the final) fall out after 2 + N (where N is a series of prime numbers 2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23,27,29).
Shpilevoy, 21.04.2016 12:02
Shpilevoy
to_Ole
"Tell me - what do the symbols I, 7/N++, (R) (MAX) and others mean that are displayed in the Credit field: when are strategies tested?
Example:
-1, -18, +72 - that's clear, that's the number of chips in the spin, minus - lost, plus - won
Credit: ( +/- ) -1 -1 -1 -1 I -1 -18 +72 ( 7 / N++ ) ( MAX ) I -18 +72 ( 8 / N++ ) ( R ) ( MAX ) I"

///////////////////////////
( +/- ) the previous minimum of the loan has been broken
(MAX) new maximum credit
I combination activated
R I don't know
I once came across N++, it seems this is a new number, not in the last 7... but there in the last 8


FoxDuhovny, 21.04.2016 09:58
FoxSpiritual
In fact, the list is virtual, I assume its existence is due to a change in the game algorithm.
FoxDuhovny, 21.04.2016 09:57
FoxSpiritual
Friends, I'm talking about using accounts, I'm not interested in bonuses in principle, I use them to check everyone's loyalty to me...
FoxDuhovny, 21.04.2016 09:20
FoxSpiritual
I did not violate anything! Both passports are in the casino, both phones are with the Security Service, they know that we are spouses and by law have the right to full access to each of the accounts, when I manage my spouse's account, I communicate with the administrator on her behalf as an authorized employee by law, I wrote to them that if necessary we can issue a notarized power of attorney with all powers by law.
Shpilevoy, 21.04.2016 08:45
Shpilevoy
linked accounts is a creepy topic
the casino may dig into its rules and refuse to pay out

//////////////
Secret materials are basically clear instructions on how to solve a topic
It's stupid to make them publicly available

the result is red, because long run can break the brightest hopes
green OVERALL is looking forward to a couple thousand people
if you estimate who is waiting without registration, then probably even 10 thousand will be collected

"full compensation of losses and half of winnings"
what else can you dream of?
FoxDuhovny, 20.04.2016 22:37
FoxSpiritual
And even despite the fact that 1000 credits were made on the spouse's account with a deposit amount of 55 credits and a bet amount of 38 credits (2+2+2) in three numbers W 72, (10) W 360 in one number (20+2) W 720 in two numbers, both accounts were included in the Potentially dangerous list, since I withdrew winnings from my account and the game strategy was the same!
FoxDuhovny, 20.04.2016 22:26
FoxSpiritual
The term Secret!!! Sometimes I go into the topic... I read... bam - secret! And this happens several times! The description says that the miner's status is supposedly insufficient to view the information hidden behind the term secret!
Friends! The term SECRET! within any content in the discussion of the topic reminds me of a game from the distant past, when we measured our height by the height of the sandbox in the yard, and then found various candy wrappers, hid them under bottle shards and buried them in the sand, and got a Secret!
And now about the main thing... What is hidden behind the term secret? Some information, which in the author's opinion represents data on some object, condition, strategy, etc. And this information cannot be provided in the public domain. Well, let's assume that I don't know how to use the Bot yet, but I see the results of those who are trying to use the Bot for promotion, but the red numbers look scary! I came here just to repaint them, say, in green! The real secret is a program inside the software with the depth of the client's bet memory, but not for everyone, but only for those who for some reason ended up on the list of Potentially dangerous! for the casino. This is my version! When I withdrew amounts from Crystal that did not exceed the weekly limits, no one was interested in me. but as soon as I got 1000 credits on my balance, something interesting started and although there was only 500 to withdraw, they called us, congratulated us, a copy of the passport from 2 accounts in the financial service and the security service and a small poster with the amount of 1000 and the word winner! A3 size. I would have withdrawn this amount too, but I decided to play on, in 5-7 spins I made another 200 credits within 2-3 minutes and after that it started... That's how I ended up on this site among friends! Hence the conclusion! As in any business, in a casino there are acceptable losses for each account, they are spelled out in the rules in the offer and in the withdrawal limits depending on the player's status.
For the Crystal Casino there are two terms that I have verified
The term Acceptable Losses is a pre-planned expense (winnings) that the casino agrees to pay to the player as a reward!
The term Potentially dangerous player is a client of the resource who does not comply with the rule: The amount of bets must exceed the amount of the deposit three times!
Ole, 08.05.2015 20:23
Ole
Tell me - what do the symbols I, 7/N++, (R) (MAX) and others mean that are displayed in the Credit field: when are strategies tested?

Example:

-1, -18, +72 - that's clear, that's the number of chips in the spin, minus - lost, plus - won

Credit: ( +/- ) -1 -1 -1 -1 I -1 -18 +72 ( 7 / N++ ) ( MAX ) I -18 +72 ( 8 / N++ ) ( R ) ( MAX ) I
Shpilevoy, 07.04.2015 11:37
Shpilevoy
collisions can be crystallized and diluted, long and short
in any case, a guessed and passed collision is a lot of money
for example "Christmas tree"
It's rare to meet one that's 15-20 spins long
but if you start actively betting it on the 4th-5th spin, then it’s easy to calculate how much money you’ll have after the 10th spin or the 15th spin

It is important to have experienced self-control and to slow down in time
after all, it's better to underearn than to lose
intuition (experience) in this case is intertwined with greed and the memory that three years ago I saw a super-tree somewhere, and what if this is the same or even longer........ )))

you need to base your game choices on the AVERAGE and not on the extremes of situations
but you need to bet confidently, only then will a successful situation unfold to the proper extent and take the loan to the ceiling
a neat game pushes money with low dispersion and eventually sooner or later we will still end up with a losing combination for any strategy
therefore, on flat sections you need to accelerate normally and brake in time when going into a dive
It's better to underearn than to lose
Valery, 04.03.2015 21:53
Valery
Thank you
Coin_8, 04.03.2015 21:37
Coin_8
"Adjacent sixlines" - two sixlines that share one edge.
***
For example: 4/9 and 7/12. In this case, 7-8-9 (edge) applies to both.
Sumiala, 19.01.2015 08:54
Sumiala
... 34, 32, 15, 31, 26, 29, 29, 34, 3, 34, 34, 3, 19 SecureWord=M3Xq6iivDIxOYZOKBNPTsqmrpPnn17nU
Imagine a track, here is a classic collision from the Profit casino.
Not only does half the wheel not play at all, but the remaining part only has 8 numbers running.
Avax, 19.01.2015 05:59
Avax
The probability of meeting a Christmas tree on the entire board is quite low and it certainly exists. But when these Christmas trees appear at any time of the betting start and clearly against your strategy, this is already abnormal.
It hurts the eyes and the mind.
The same thing when you suddenly start betting the N-th dozen and it miraculously disappears right now for 20 spins (until the money runs out).
Or you catch a cold, and the casino accelerates narrow repetitions to a degree of >50%.
Or, on the contrary, you started catching hot numbers, and they don’t even think about repeating themselves.

A lot of collisions make the player think, "This just can't be happening."
iliya, 18.01.2015 09:52
iliya
I understand that:
Discreteness is the same as discontinuity.
Dispersion - Wikipedia says that this is a spread of values, different from the mathematical expectation, but in our case it is a collision. What to do?
InquisitorEA, 01/18/2015 06:41
InquisitorEA
Collision is how the spins should not fall out without outside influence. 50/50 is in the long term. In the short term, there must be deviations from this 50/50. The shorter the period in question, the greater the deviations must be. This is a property of randomness.
iliya, 18.01.2015 06:10
iliya
If a collision is a skew in the spins falling out, then why is the Christmas tree a skew? After all, the colors fall out with a probability of 50/50.
Coin_8, 13.01.2015 18:01
Coin_8
As West wrote (he plays on simple chances - picking up the color according to Martin [1,2,4,8,16,...]) "... I sit and look at the statistics, a normal game here and there, as soon as I enter the game, after 10 minutes the whole scoreboard lines up like a herringbone."

***
What do we see?
1) The only way to kill such a player is to not let the color repeat. Constantly changing colors on the scoreboard is an eyesore (herringbone).
2) The entry point into the game (the start of betting) is always arbitrary, but the Christmas tree appears IMMEDIATELY.

Conclusions:
1) A Christmas tree several screens long on the statistics board is a rough, tough collision.
2) The adaptive is tailored specifically for the Westa game.
3) Counter-circuit generation is switched on immediately, without any build-up.
etc.

***
But this is a special case. A simple one.
Poole studies both pure RNG and adaptive casino reactions. It is at the junction of these two areas of knowledge that the "grail" is located - a universal algorithm that beats any roulette in the LONG PERIOD.
Shpilevoy, 13.01.2015 13:50
Shpilevoy
the group of numbers 24,5,10,23,8,30,11,13,27 is the ideal cluster for this section of the game
if you find clusters that are close to ideal and play them correctly
then the roulette becomes a cornucopia
Shpilevoy, 13.01.2015 13:42
Shpilevoy
here is a fresh game with a bot at Click
2015-01-12
Spins:
0 - 27 - 12 - 16 - 28 - 1 - 34 - 29 - 10 - 7 - 19 - 30 - 21 - 25 - 14 - 2 - 0 - 35 - 10 - 35 - 20 - 22 - 31 - 34 - 36 - 0 - 8 - 12 - 33 - 32 - 15 - 18 - 7 - 27 - 10 - 30 - 17 - 8 - 30 - 13 - 13 - 23 - 5 - 30 - 24 - 11 - 7 - 9 - 14 - 1 - 28 - 33 - 2 - 2 - 23 - 13 - 10 - 1 - 5 - 32 - 11 - 36 - 30 - 4 - 14 - 35 - 4 - 12 - 2 - 10 - 7 - 27 - 18 - 33 - 29 - 13 - 33 - 17 - 10 - 0 - 17 - 16 - 15 - 11 - 6 - 28 - 13 - 18 -
Start 500 Max 715 Min 187 Finish 313
>> Bot mining: order 2525 > European roulette > Profit

you can see the piece right away
27 - 10 - 30 - 17 - 8 - 30 - 13 - 13 - 23 - 5 - 30 - 24 - 11
the only way out of the small series is 17 and the rest is a collision 12 spins the small series is coming
i.e. 2/3 of the track fell asleep
a smart player will pick up the bias (trend) and make x10 or even x20 in 10 minutes )))

and if you also lay it out correctly, since the series also doesn't play evenly, then you can squeeze out all x50 on the hot section 24.5,10,23,8,30,11,13,27 out of 9 numbers
Sumiala, 13.01.2015 12:43
Sumiala
A collision is a distortion in the distribution of spins.
Poole considers them as an integral part of any rng sequence. The nature of roulette spins is far from the normal distribution accepted in classical probability theory.
Quite the contrary, roulette is an example of chaotic abnormality.

If you force any dozen, it seems that on average almost 1/3 of the winnings should fall out.
In the ve-e-e-ery long term, perhaps it will be so.
But within 100 or even 500 spins we see clear deviations from average normality.
In everything!

Collisions can be very hard, or they can be smooth.
Collisions can be very short, or long/stable/.

But bright, powerful collisions that are clearly directed against the player’s strategy always surprise.
Here we come to the concept of adaptive/counter-scheme generations/ and cheating on the part of the casino.




Avax, 13.01.2015 11:30
Avax
For complete beginners, you need to start

casino-mining.com ...
Shpilevoy, 13.01.2015 06:04
Shpilevoy
everything is correct

flat - even bets without progression.
For example, we decided to play 2 chips per number, and that’s how we play, at least we force 2 numbers per move, at least 22.

progression - every time we lose we increase, every time we win we decrease.
You decide for yourself how much to increase or decrease.
there are classic (generally accepted) progressions, but they are not a panacea, you can come up with your own rules of movement. In this case, you need to focus on the current credit, the width of the field of the numbers being filled in, etc.

the pool now uses step progressions, when the bet increases every 3 lost moves + the progression is contained in the order ladder itself, when you play games priced at 0.01 - 0.03 - 0.05, etc.

///////////
bet on the number (an plen) - this is a TYPE of bet when the chips are placed exactly on the number (not a split, not a coner, not a sixline, etc.)

/////////////
It is also very important to understand the rates on the track in the neighbors and in the series (spire, big, orpheus, small)
neighbors can be classic (two numbers from the central one) and extended (4 numbers from the central one)
iliya, 12.01.2015 23:57
iliya
Flat is a bet that does not change, unlike progression.

An capt - same as straight up, a bet on 1 number.

Dead End: The Struggle of the Irreconcilable or a Place for Debates Where Truth Perishes! - There can be no accuracy in predicting a case and there is only the most and least probable. Adherents of the exact sciences do not like such forecasts, and therefore they stand on "dogmas", since no one offers an exact formula anyway. In fact, these are two different worldviews, the world of dogmatists and romantics - but how many broken copies! A clear example is Roulette Internet forums, where some card counters, as "big brothers", insert themselves into discussions, trying to set roulette players on the right path. The former, as adherents of accuracy, are sure of everything and put pressure on this, the latter, as adherents of chance, are not sure of anything, but, remembering the discrepancies between theory and practice, stand their ground. This is the whole point, the whole thrill, that the dispute turns out to be endless, since there are no universal solutions, and never will be. Practitioners realize this and adapt to these circumstances. Gentlemen theoreticians are looking for a universal equation and are pissing themselves when they don't find it. That's why there is so much bile in the criticism of roulette players. Some want to understand how the Roulette Player's brain works, while others stubbornly argue for the sake of arguing. With such approaches, the truth is still somewhere nearby!

In contrast to roulette, there are a lot of games in which everything is transparent and clear to any mathematician, hence the obvious "Fie" towards any attempt to object that roulette can be beaten. Let's leave the rhetoric about MO and the topic of disputes with their consequences alone, let's focus on the psychological justifications of systems, aspects closely intertwined with the game...

Details, means, methods, all the ways to win are nothing if you do not realize the strengths of our Self, which can become our weakness! - Long ago, having abandoned all attempts to rely on my own intuition in the game, I took as a basic rule, in building systems to exclude the human factor and a maximum of "If". The goal is to remove any manifestation of intuition and submit to a complex system of methods, systemic behavior, designed for a series of games, limiting all decisions only to decisions, the answers to which are determined in advance, long before the start of the game. It is foolish to oppose a simple mechanical process, human ideas about the nature of your own inimitable "instinct". In fact, all "instinct" fits perfectly into simple logical operations. The Cerberus condition obliges, having started, to carry out the program of actions, even if doubts visit during the game, and an "opinion" appears ...

"Opinion" is exactly that very intuition that whispers to you, this or that will happen now! This also includes attempts to predict the dealer's throws, as well as the dealer's own opinion that he can throw something somewhere. Our perception is organized to transform information, where old experience is superimposed on the new and interpreted with the help of imagination. We are tuned to the process of creation, a process that presupposes space, dreams in the future beyond logic, because of which a closed system of 37 numbers seems to us something more significant than a game with chance. So the numbers that have fallen on the roulette wheel tend to repeat themselves, this is the law of "Two Thirds" a property of a closed space, where they simply have nowhere to go, to which we inevitably pay attention and give comments beyond common sense.

"Wishful thinking for reality!" - Regular repetitions of sectors are attributed to the dealer's throws. Remember the already mentioned "uneven distribution in short segments of the game" where series of repetitions are mandatory. The falling out of roulette sectors is not distributed evenly, so the same sector can be repeated in a row, or every other time, and this can happen many times and this is the essence of Chaos, and not someone's intent that is attributed to the dealer's hand.

"Consequences" - In a game of intuition, initially thinking adequately, we inevitably follow the inadequate. Simple information, plus the experience gained begins to be interpreted and varied. The manifestation of "Opinion" becomes a trap, in a situation where nothing but bare logic can exist. You place a bet on intuition, it is confirmed and from that moment on a false sense of your own superiority over chance appears. The "dream" has come true! In the long term, as negative and positive experience accumulates, "Opinion" develops into "Suspiciousness" and shakes the nervous system, each time forcing more and more doubts. You hysterically make attempts to tune in to a successful wave, accelerating in decision-making, or rather in an attempt to calculate more and more outcomes in a short time, which further increases the experience of your victories and mistakes. As a result, you finally overload your brain, ceasing to think adequately, and commit acts against your real capabilities. The remnants of logic are irrevocably switched off, and the naked "Dream", the hope for a better outcome, enters the battle. As soon as this happens, you are already a person who needs long-term rehabilitation, depending on the severity, from a month to many years of excluding gambling...

"Intuition" is a stumbling block for many players, even when playing systematically, they stand by it like a wall until thunder strikes, and it will be too late to do anything. Intuition, and in fact analysis plus imagination, multiplied by persistence is part of the creative process inherent in a person. Thanks to these qualities, we can change life situations around us. As we behave, so the situation will change, we can find ways to improve our own existence, influence our environment, which is what we get caught on when we try to influence a strictly recorded case that has nothing to do with life situations.

A simple game has already been nicknamed "The Devil's Wheel", blaming all of one's own intrigues on the "evil one". That's just the way the human ego works! As always, in order not to get into the details, we'll find someone to blame, and, in essence, we'll shift all the blame from ourselves to the primitive device. And only a small percentage of players will be able to admit this to themselves. The majority will develop their intuition until they're blue in the face, endowing the roulette with personality traits, and, in essence, their own mirror, reflecting only negative qualities, and predicting, predicting, predicting...

Thus, spiritualizing the roulette, the player gradually reaches conversations and disputes with dead iron - "Give! Don't give!" And then - "The wheel gave! The wheel didn't give!"

A casino is a complexly organized system of total control with clear rules of conduct and instructions for the staff. Moreover, the control and requirements for its own employees are stricter than for visitors. Roulette is a simple mechanism, but still the same system. My deep conviction is that if you came to the casino not to have fun, then, following the same logic, you should oppose the system - a system and a systematic approach, subjecting yourself to the same strict rules, ignoring any manifestation of "opinion", as well as trying to watch the spinning wheel and ball less often. Any unplanned bet is a crime and there are only two decisions for the player: When to start the game! When to end the game! Pauses and the place where the bet is made are strictly determined by the system ...

Slow and steady wins the race! - To learn how to drive a car masterfully, you will need more than one day. A car is still the same system, and to master it, you need practice, developing a systematic behavior behind the wheel, and only a frivolous person without this practice will tell you - "Nonsense! Get in and go!" It is necessary to cultivate an equally adequate attitude in relation to the systemic game. For example, if a player who played intuitively wants to play according to the system, following this desire, does not change in the moment, the idea will be discredited from the beginning - too different approaches, in the expectation of the result and methods of the game. The opposite of the methodical "passion", settles in the player for a long time and evaporates over the years. A gambler is famous for his intolerance, and therefore accidents are inevitable. In other words, such a driver is able to drive only to the first pole. There are no instant miracles and in order to change, such a player needs great shocks, usually associated with global losses. Alas, but here too, practice shows that late insight comes when playing becomes completely contraindicated, whether intuitively or systematically, the fatal outcome is already predetermined. It's time to put on a straitjacket and rest not for months, but for years. It is from such an attitude to the game that the wave of doubts and mistrust of systems draws its strength. In essence, the search for the scapegoat, hatred of one's own mistakes, is transferred to a systemic approach, where a verdict is given to all systems - the system is "crap" and thoughtless "pinning" continues, strengthening the ranks of losers.

Tolerance - if a system is chosen for the game, then in order to feel what and most importantly, how much $ to expect from it, multiple games are necessary in theory, then in a real game it will be possible to adequately react to the developing situation. So even before the start of the game session, tracking the statistics of the dropped numbers, you can understand whether it is worth starting the game, or it is reasonable to wait for a favorable moment. If you calm down "Appetite", as a result of the training you will learn to leave the gaming table in time. In fact, regular training is part of the system and the key to your common sense during the game itself.

First of all, you have to understand that systematic behavior is a different attitude to the game! There is nothing easy and familiar about it, your whole being will rebel against what is happening, where you will have to completely rebuild your own perception. Moreover, get used to it for years. Moreover, the longer you played intuitively, the longer it will take to rebuild. The game is a tedious process, and when you start playing systematically and adequately, you immediately notice it. The main thing that is difficult to understand is - "Don't twitch when you lose and don't be too happy when you win!" - each individual bet is only a link in the chain of events and the result will be determined by the sum of the game days and a single day is not an indicator.

Start discussion Loiri