How we are being smeared in the game

I have already written many times - why I try not to play on no deposits, not to take any free spins, etc., usually I take it only if I want to record a ludovod anyway or deposit somewhere to play. Now I read Feruell's well and he VERY clearly outlined this situation, it turns out this trick is called the Cialdini sequence. So, for those who have not read it - in order, if anyone is not in the know - Feruell is a guy who is cool at poker and seems to be no fool himself, sometimes of course he writes complete nonsense, but often really smart thoughts. So, he plays poker on Stars and he gets this thing: To say thank you for being a loyal PokerStars customer and to coincide with the start of the Football/Soccer season we have given you an exclusive free sports bet worth 200. This bet is in your account right now and can be used on any sport, it will expire on Tuesday. Like, they gave me $200 for free to place a bet! And then the letter: Welcome to PokerStars sports betting! We hope you're enjoying betting on our wide range of sports at PokerStars, and don't forget: you can still get up to $/£/€100 in free bets! This exclusive offer is for players who make their first four real money bets at odds of 1.5(1/2) or higher. For each bet you make, you'll receive free bets worth up to $/£/€100 in total (conditions apply). And then there's that post: A full analysis of their actions is something like this. First, they give me $200 for free, on the condition that I place a bet. This offer is too good to refuse. $200 in 5 minutes and a couple of clicks. Then they give me a worse gift. You need to make four bets with real money, there are some conditions on the odds of the bets, apparently on the amounts to be wagered too, and the bonus is only for a hundred. The amount of work is much greater. This is where the so-called "consistency trick" comes into play, which in the original by Cialdini was called much more successfully - consistency bias. A person remembers that last time he accepted a betting promo from PokerStars, therefore, why not accept it again? Although if he had initially been offered conditions with 4 bets and 100 dollars, the chances that he would have started to sort it all out were lower. When making decisions, people rely on past experience, PokerStars artificially created the experience of accepting a promo on bets. But this is not the end of the story, of course. When you bet on a sporting event and then watch the broadcast, you produce adrenaline. You "root" for the outcome and the money you bet greatly contributes to an increase in the adrenaline produced. Repeat this process 5 times and the body will get used to receiving doses of adrenaline. If you stop betting, then adrenaline withdrawal will occur. Not such that a person climbs the wall, but such that he can semi-consciously open the betting tab and bet 50 bucks to "look more fun at the match." And then again and again, right up to the point of losing his pants. But that's not all. By forcing a person to bet real money with odds of at least 1.5 for the sake of a bonus, they create a decent probability that the person will end up in the red as a result of promo bets. And then the loss aversion mechanism will work, the same mechanism due to which regs play an extra 5 hours to bring a poker session into the plus. There is no point in this, it is a mental bug, but people are so designed that they do not like to end in the minus. And evil people can exploit this. In general, those who lose on promo bets will often bet more to get out of the minus. And then more and more. Naturally, the insidious plan of PokerStars can be resisted. At each stage there is a chance that the client will get off the hook for one reason or another. But with a large volume of clients, they will make a cashier. That's how it is, guys, I remember several times I lost a lot of money when I took advantage of an offer like deposit 100 bucks and get 20 free spins, which at best give 5-10 bucks, and then putty and you lose all the money you have... /TTRсasinо.ru/

I proceed from the simple rule "the player and the casino are on opposite sides of the barricade" therefore the casino will NEVER offer something that is not beneficial to them this is basically impossible and if so, I send their BONUSES, PROMOTIONS and PROMOTIONS to the firebox from the start //////////////////////////// the same applies to banking services when the manager calls and offers to draw up an addendum to the deposit agreement and transfer it from dollars to Swiss francs, tells how stable and cool they are, this is my security and blah-blah-blah I immediately KNOW that this is beneficial to the BANK and not to the client, accordingly, I do not do stupid things