Why do we lose when there are many advisers?

yesterday I played in the hall -200 -400 +600 +1200 +2200 for 600 invested +2k norms, I was thinking of leaving and changing the hall but a good friend came up (he either lost or looked in without any money at all) and wanted to be present, to watch (a lot of people already like to watch my game) ...... and I lost everything I must say that this is not the first time when thanks to him I pour out big WINNINGS ... but it's one thing when we play in parallel on the same roulette = I bet concentrated centers, and he sprinkles the entire field with pennies = it is clear that the adaptive starts throwing him meager winnings, and shaving off my bets but now!?!? he was just sitting nearby and naming numbers and options in batches (although no one asked him) more and more often I heard "well why didn't you bet, I told you so!", "would you mind throwing a couple of chips at my numbers" etc. ////////////////////////////// the loss made me sad.... when I got home I thought IS HE REALLY THAT UNLUCKY??? this is MYSTICISM, and this does not suit me as an explanation...... I analyzed the situation and UNDERSTOOD when an ADVISER is sitting next to you, you can treat him differently 1) he is your friend-partner and you are playing a game together 2) "negative" = you want to wipe his nose and show what a fucking master you are with him I have an old psychological option #2 and what happens? looking at the game the guy, like a machine gun, names several options and thereby BLOCKS your bets there, because if it comes true, then it is HE who GUESSED and not you, and often instead of adequately OBJECTIVELY reorganizing into the necessary sectors/numbers, you continue to rest in the old zones = drain...drain.....drain.... and more and more often "Well, I told you so....Damn, I knew the number!!!" ////////////////////////////////// SHOULD WE SEND THE ASSHOLE TO HELL? after all, such stubbornness is too expensive..... NO! there is a more beautiful solution ))))) with a large loan, when your friend sits down and starts to advise you UNDER THE HAND STOP PLAYING YOUR GAME and offer him another one since you are so smart, let's name 1 number each move, I will put 1 minimum chip in it and I will play 1 number on my own and also 1 minimum chip = 2 numbers are closed per spin and we will keep SCORE for each of us guessed +1 missed -1 we play 100 spins and see who guesses more accurately === total 1) a lot of money is not lost, there will be guesses, so even a small plus is very likely 2) your friend will be happy, because he is "in the game" 3) you can listen to what is in his head, how he chooses numbers 4) THE CREDIT WILL BE WHOLE, because there will be no mistake in cutting off his advice and gushing past

Wow! It turns out you're more delicate than other players... When I played the steering wheel in the earthly version, I "blew off" all advisers regardless of who they were to me according to the following scenario: - ok, since you sincerely want to help, let's do it as a partner, you name the number, we go all-in, the bet wins, the money is split in half, the bet misses, you return half. If we agreed, I infect exactly the amount of money that allows me to close one number to the maximum, taking into account double splits, and you, turning to the smart guy, put half of the bet on top of the monitor field... Only a few agreed, but they fell silent and left after the first loss... I love advisers, there was one guy with whom we fought until 4 in the morning, he stood behind me for a short time until three wins, and then sat down next to me... he offered me 100 bucks for three numbers that he would name, in the event that at least one number does not play, I keep the hundred, if all three win then I will return the hundred and half the winnings, as you understand I kept the agreement, we left the table with 35K rubles per nose, I saw him off to the train to St. Petersburg, it was in the capital a long time ago... now I remembered about advisers...

I agree with Andrey, it is rare to show such delicacy. Shpilevoy writes:

I thought IS HE REALLY SO UNLUCKY??? This is MYSTICISM

As soon as I saw this highlighted phrase, I immediately remembered the film INTAKTO (winner of the Fantashportu festival in the nomination "Best Screenplay") If anyone hasn't seen it, I won't copy the summary, but in my own words, what's so special about it. The basis is the law of normal distribution (Gauss's bell) All phenomena of animate and inanimate nature are distributed according to this law (except for the numbers falling out in modern roulettes, of course). The idea was that the head of the secret organization believes that people are also distributed according to this law according to the degree of their endowment with luck, namely 3-5 percent are the super-lucky ones, 3-5 percent are the extreme losers, and the rest of the people are distributed evenly between these opposites, forming the concept of the average. And the goal is to calculate the super-lucky ones (all over the world) - to gather them together so that they can participate in underground games among themselves for the title of absolute lucky one. The winner will have the right to play with the God of Luck himself, with the one who never loses. The idea itself is interesting, but the scriptwriters added mysticism and drama, it turned out to be either a thriller or a detective story... But I am personally interested in the moment when a person goes from one extreme to another. Even now, when I was writing, I remembered Koin:

I also want to note that even super-pros have moments of complete failure. But they get through them correctly - they immediately minimize losses and wait out the bad streak. In your interpretation, this means that the player does not move consistently according to the bell, but chaotically appears between two extremes: "I am God" - "I am a loser". It is necessary to evaluate near which pole he is more often, and this perfectly demonstrates the financial result of a long period.

Shpilevoy writes:

... more and more often they said "well, why didn't you put it, I told you so!....well, I knew the number!!!"

And this is a controversial point. It's one thing when there was no bet on a number, and another when there is a bet with a claim to a big win. It is impossible to say for sure whether his named number would have come up in this case. This was not a game in Profit, where the CC and all the numbers in the series are fixed in advance. Each player is an individual, but it is better to preserve your own)

once we talked with DLK (Avax) he and his friend went to roulette, on small wide bets he made x2 x3 and the friend then poured the same credit in a few hits and so on in a circle.... and DLK looked at the arrangement and after SPIN called the sectors where it would most likely fall and GUESSED )))) as you guessed, he called something completely different from where the crying one bet ///////////////////////////////////// I told him on my fingers that after the adaptive showed x2 he thinks that everything is fair and now he can kill... accordingly, the bets became more concentrated, the claim for payment is tougher = the rollout began = it goes without saying that the area of the wheel OUTSIDE THE BETS accelerates and when the "adviser" calls ANY LOSSING numbers, their frequency of occurrence increases by an order of magnitude and it is clear that he begins fabulously guess even by naming several numbers, not to mention series and neighbors when DLK himself played a dozen times after doubling, he saw how even wide bets roll out, when 2/3 of the field is caught with insurance ))))) and eventually agreed that if someone nearby called unmarked numbers, he would be Vanga ))))

kill after X2... honestly... well, of course, we tried different ways, the best thing was that the bet cancellation worked on the pneumatic steering wheel! (though not everywhere) - a few seconds before the bets are closed, the bet is canceled and... 1 credit in zero and so on exactly until zero falls out..., as a rule, zero fell out with a 180 degree bias and after the fall, a bet was made exactly after the "ball was shot" killing the four opposite Zero - 5,10,16,24 all-in - though exactly the maximum bet on 4 numbers was put into the bank head-on... the winnings were immediately withdrawn and everything was repeated again... after the 4th withdrawal, the ball began to "fever" like in that video that Shpilevoy once showed... and we left the casino for a couple of days, then returned and everything was repeated... The steering wheel "froze" only by the weekend when people were pouring in in full...

Yes, I tried it and understood why advice in the unset area works so often :evil: