Who does the BEB open cases against?
Officially, government officials familiar with the investigation materials are not disclosing the names of the companies and banks that used the described tax evasion schemes.
Three Forbes sources, including government officials familiar with the investigation materials and bankers, named
Parimatch, Ukraine's largest gambling company, as one of the defendants in the case.
Top 5 Largest Companies
in the Ukrainian gambling market:
Parimatch
Favbet
Cosmolot
Vbet
PinUP
These are all legal companies with licenses.
Unlicensed players also generate hidden turnover, says lawyer Artem Kuzmenko.
"They have no other choice but to use miscoding," he says.
Despite legalization, the Ukrainian Gambling Council, a specialized association, estimates the ratio of white to black markets at 30% to 70%.
As a result, the gambling business's profits are transferred to foreign accounts in cryptocurrency or cash.
"We will assess additional tax liabilities on these funds at the appropriate rates," said a member of parliament, speaking on condition of anonymity among the participants of the temporary administrative commission in the Rada.
Banks and gambling
The BEB case file names nine financial institutions, MP Zheleznyak wrote. The deputy doesn't directly name them, but his report suggests the state-owned Ukrgasbank and private Ibox Bank.
Also, according to two sources, the matter concerns
Sense Bank,
Concord Bank, and a number of smaller institutions:
Oxy Bank, Cominbank, and others. All of them deny collusion with the gambling industry, let alone miscoding.
According to three officials familiar with the case materials and market participants, state-owned Ukrgasbank was the leader in terms of gambling transaction volume. "It accounted for 50-70% of transactions," says a banker who spoke on condition of anonymity. He did not provide any confirmation for this statement.
After the investigation was reviewed by the Verkhovna Rada's Temporary Investigative Committee, Andrey Kravets left his position as CEO of Ukrgasbank (his name disappeared from the list of top management on the bank's website).
It is not easy to prove the deliberate participation of banks in gambling schemes
Even proven instances of miscoding don't necessarily mean a violation on the part of the institution: it can happen to anyone providing acquiring services, says Olena Korobkova, head of the board of the Independent Association of Ukrainian Banks. "If a bank doesn't want to know about it, it won't," adds one NBU official interviewed on condition of anonymity. "But even if it does, there are ways to deceive it."
Miscoding occurs at the merchant level, using acquiring services. Under normal circumstances, the regulator, as well as the bank's internal services, can only detect miscoding through test purchases, according to two bankers. "Without inspections and, in some cases, without going through the customer's journey, it's unlikely to be detected," notes an NBU official.
Systematic manipulation is another matter. "Such disguise cannot remain unnoticed for long," Korobkova believes. One MP, speaking on condition of anonymity, also asserts that the institution's leadership could not have been unaware of the miscoding operations, given their scale.
Banks could profit handsomely from their partnerships with the gambling industry. "Legal fees for acquiring are around 1%, while miscoding fees are 5-6%," says one lawyer, speaking on condition of anonymity.
All banks providing e-commerce acquiring services are currently undergoing unscheduled inspections by the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU), according to a source at one such institution. Ukrainian law doesn't stipulate specific penalties for miscoding, but the NBU can impose sanctions ranging from a written warning to temporary suspension or revocation of licenses, Korobkova says. According to two NBU sources, the regulator is preparing a response. "It will be tough," one of them promises.
Also, at the end of last year, international payment systems significantly tightened controls over payment codes related to gambling, the banker adds. "That's why, since December, most players have stopped using video game payments," he says. Fines for potential abuses start at tens of thousands of dollars, the source adds.
However, even after the searches and roulettes taken by payment systems and the NBU, at least one privately owned bank continued to provide the service, according to MP Zheleznyak. "Based on the information we have, that's 250-300 million hryvnias per day," he wrote.
Under-legalized UA gambling business
Two companies from the top 5 in the gambling market,
Parimatch and Favbet, noted in a comment to Forbes that they support the adoption of new tax legislation – bill 2713-d.
The legislative changes discussed by gambling industry representatives should resolve the current market stalemate. What is the underlying issue? The key problem is that
the government, although it legalized the gambling industry in 2020, has failed to update tax legislation.
Companies are required to pay taxes under a 2012 law. Almost three years after the industry was legalized, parliamentarians have rejected changes to the tax system. The main changes that need to be introduced are the concept of "online casinos" (not included in the old law), the introduction of a tax on winnings and the establishment of a minimum amount, and the establishment of a uniform GGR tax of 10% for all types of activity.
“Giving away 18% of GGR is not economically justified and motivates market players to move into the gray zone,” said a top manager at a bookmaker.[/quote]
So gambling isn't interested in revealing its full turnover. "Then you'll be operating at a loss," confirms one industry representative.
Temporary solution
In April 2022, another imbalance emerged. The Verkhovna Rada granted the industry a simplified tax system—2% of revenue. Eight companies took advantage of this simplification, including Parimatch, Cosmolot, and 1XBET, which has already had its license revoked.
Before the transition, these companies paid an average of 200,000 hryvnias in taxes per day; afterward, the figure dropped to 23,000 hryvnias. In January 2023, the Verkhovna Rada abolished the simplified tax system for the gambling business.
What to expect in the gambling business in 2023?
Unofficial agreement:Until bill No. 2713-d is passed, businesses may operate “under the table” due to miscoding, says a top manager of a gambling company.
Until changes to the tax law are adopted,
gambling businesses must pay triple the amount for a license.
"According to the tax rules, we can't change the law mid-year," says Boris Baum, former head of the advisory board at KRAIL. "So this was our insurance policy—they pay us taxes in advance until we implement them." After the tax law is passed, parliament is expected to reduce the license fee by a third.
In July 2021, bill No. 2713-d was adopted in its first reading.
It was supposed to be submitted for a second reading in December 2022, but this did not happen.
In August 2022, the Cabinet of Ministers transferred responsibility for the gambling industry to the Ministry of Digital Transformation, which had previously been under the Ministry of Economy. The Ministry of Digital Transformation is preparing other legislative amendments and proposes liquidating the KRAIL.
The Ministry of Digital Transformation's goal is to automate the licensing and tax payment processes, eliminating the human factor and, therefore, corruption. The goal is to encourage foreign companies to incorporate in Ukraine and pay taxes, Minister Mykhailo Fedorov previously told Forbes.
Foreigners are showing interest in the Ukrainian gambling market. About eight European online casinos (mostly British) are ready to enter Ukraine even during the war, says Anton Kuchukhidze, head of the All-Ukrainian Gambling Council. "The condition is the adoption of Law No. 2713-d." Without the law, large operators will not operate in Ukraine, Baum believes.
“Only our fish can swim in muddy water,”, says KRAIL.