Honest online casinos - guarantees and honesty control (HC) for the player

In my opinion, current online casinos are far from ideal, not only is the actual percentage of winnings low, but also the withdrawal of money is very slow (sometimes 10K rubles are withdrawn from the casino in about 4 days).

The Russian segment is a disaster in general, constant bans from Roskomnadzor + a lot of left-wing shitty casinos that do not give normal winnings at all.

In such a situation, any player is looking for honest and reliable casinos. First of all, the honesty of the game itself is of interest.

MD5/SHA256 honesty control mechanism. A few years ago, it was the only (used) algorithm that guaranteed the immutability of the event result. And now nothing has changed.



In guarantee of impartiality, that the RNG does not adjust to each player's action - yes, I believe, here the result is sent to the player before he makes a bet, so to speak, everything is super. The algorithm gives one guarantee that the result of the event did not change after (did not change depending on) your actions.

The only thing I can't believe in yet in the case of using electronic signatures is the guarantee of pure randomness of the generation itself. This algorithm, it seems to me, cannot guarantee the randomness of distribution.

The engine's insides can only be checked if the code is tested. For this reason, the RB now requires IA manufacturers to open the code, which leaves everyone completely stupefied.

Only a "shift" on the player's side can break the casino's counter-scheme generation. This is an absolutely necessary element of a high-quality CC mechanism. Without it, fairness control is considered incomplete. All casinos that offer CC without the ability to knock down/shift the result on the player's side are scammers exploiting players' desire to find a fair game.

Konstantin

So far, bookmakers have: all sorts of tsupis and interactive bets. That is, the basis for legalizing online casinos is supposedly being created. Problems of all bookmakers: illegality, arbitrariness, lack of control, fraud.

I've seen a lot of things over the past few years.
I wouldn't want to distract the reader with a list of horrors, but suddenly people are completely unaware.

For example, regarding unexpected identification-verification options upon payment.
How do you like the requirement to deliver a notarized copy of your passport translated into Spanish by courier to an office in the Philippines?

Did you know about video conferences with a passport in front of your face? That such photos are posted not only on gaming forums, but also on porn and gay sites?

There have also been cases of confiscation of player money for using the "professional Martingale method of playing" (!)
These are extreme manifestations of the aforementioned “arbitrariness” and “lack of control”.

The point "deception" is no less important. And now contact with ANY online establishment begins with deception!
Let's compare it to a land-based casino. Please follow my train of thought.

Nowadays, "on the ground" passport control is carried out AT THE ENTRANCE. In particular, this excludes possible future claims and lawsuits from ruined parents of underage players and from self-banned gambling addicts. As well as other incapacitated persons.
Now, attention: in almost all, even "solid Western" online casinos and bookmakers - minors have the opportunity to successfully replenish the deposit, play and cause considerable damage to the family budget. Moreover, there are always many ways to deposit money, twice as many as for withdrawal.

Having convinced ourselves of the undoubted presence of this “innocent” deceit, we can consistently make some conclusions and assumptions:
1.What now looks rather dubious are the statements of online establishments about their absolute law-abidingness. Which is how they usually explain all the obstacles, strictness and repressions towards clients. And also the honesty of the games.
2. That they are not so afraid of sanctions from all sorts of mythical bodies, fines, license revocation. Are they restrained by moral considerations? Obviously not...
...
The thoughts can be continued and go far.

It would seem that everything is in order with access to the game at Russian online bookmakers - identification of a person in the TSUPIS system is carried out upon personal appearance at the PPS. Apparently, this process will not begin without court decisions - the process of consciously choosing the path towards common sense and respect for players.

For example, it was not possible to leave the following in the new rules of the Betting League:

The bookmaker has the right to request the Client to provide a Personal Certificate of the Web Money Transfer payment system. In the absence of such a certificate, the bookmaker reserves the right to limit the Client's ability to receive winnings using this Payment System.

- I remember the old gambling dens, where the entrance is one ruble, and the exit is two. Something like this is impossible in a land-based casino or PPS. "Request" - you need to do it when replenishing. And it is better not to request at all. Otherwise it will be like on the roads, where they put up crossing signs and traffic lights depending on the number of grandmothers hit.

Konstantin

If there were fundamentally and consistently honest online game organizers, they would be concerned with easy and problem-free payouts of winnings first of all. For example, through their own terminal system.

And also the actual provision of clients with convenient and proven legal methods for resolving problems and conflicts.

The ability to play online while sitting on the couch in your underwear, drinking beer, scratching your lower belly - this is already a familiar, but rather dubious lure from "affiliate partners". Well, yes, you can do a lot of things in front of the monitor.

I remember the revelations of one hero from a book about casinos, a successful player according to the plot. He prepared for a meeting with roulette as with a woman: he shaved, washed, put on perfume, drank in moderation and put on his best.

JulianaL: Online casinos are much more convenient than real ones. Yes, the sensations may be a little different, but at least it's warm and comfortable, you can go in as much as you want. And the best thing is their crazy bonuses.

Many players consider these bonuses as an ambush, as an extra way to enslave the deposit and suspect the client of breaking the rules.

There are online casinos that, on principle, don't give any sticky bonuses (bonuses are automatically calculated on a separate account and do not link deposits) - this looks solid.

But for the most part, thanks to the existence of the bonus system, any client can easily be accused of the horrors of "bonus hunting and multi-accounting", then have their account blocked "for investigation" with subsequent confiscation of all funds.

The casino can always rob a large win, if necessary - the wording is simple "you have been detected with a multi-account, and this is prohibited by the Rules of our casino."

Konstantin

Everything that is written about poker, casinos and bookmakers on the Internet is a SCAM! More precisely, this is the marketing promotion of establishments and their competitive struggle for traffic of new players.

All these forums, sites, blogs and groups are created for the purpose of advertising of various kinds, sometimes very intricate.

It is based on referral links of affiliate programs for transitions to casino and bookmaker websites.

Direct links to "third-party gaming resources" also exist, and such advertising (essentially) sites are often created by the owners of the resources themselves.

But there are even supposedly "independent forums of noble robbers" who engage in anti-PR, releasing only for a fee another victim from the extensive "Black List", after which the forum members suddenly begin to intensively praise this casino, rather than scold it.